Question for the leftists lurking Any Forums, i know you're out there

If class is more important than race then why does every socialist nation fall into ethnic conflicts the second there's any problem into their countries?

Attached: yugo.jpg (1820x1024, 96.4K)

Socialism prevented ethnic conflicts from arising. Its because socialism fell and capitalism was implemented that ethnic tensions arose. That proves that socialism is able to reduce tensions and class unity is a way to bring people together across ethnic lines.

Because they let Jews in. Not only do they let them in, they give them power, media control and decision making authority because they're too tolerant and trustworthy.

why you mutts are so into this bullshit?

On surface, but inside, we hated each other guts socialism or not.

Yugoslavia was not socialist. In fact, anything besides Stalinist USSR and Hoxhaist Albania cant be considerated a socialist society

and the ethnic conflicts were aliviated in both countries

Because capitalism from outside introduced and strengthened ethnic tension by financing nationalists groups in yugoslavia.
t yugo pro

Surely after years of Socialist education people would just inherently understand that class matters more than race, right? Would the evidence to the contrary just prove that socialism has to go out of it's way to pretend race doesn't exist and put a lid on that fact since it's something that is impossible to erase outside of Judeo-bolshevik anti-white sexual fantasies

Of course you did, is that why your country literally invented the idea of South Slavia or Yugoslavia, retard

Yugoslavia was the only pretty functional communism ever. And the moment the charismatic and good leader does,that explodes.
You praise for poverty

*Die

Ethnic tensions are used as a tool by the bourgeoise to turn workers against one another. The socialist project and education takes time to challenge reactionary beliefs and tribalist attitudes, but in a society that achieves full socialist liberation racial conflict would be minimized as material conditions would be sufficient for all workers and there would be less fighting over resources. They would also be more likely to feel invested in the socialist project and nation state if it is able to provide them a good life and follow the ideals it promised. The problem is most socialist states have not managed to achieve this ideal of democratic socialism, usually turning to authoritarianism.

All I know is the person fucking me better be white.
I hate being exploited by the wrong skin tone.

This.

this happens when nationalism rots your brain. only after sucking so much nazi dick and having a huge inferiority complex do you become this delusional. its only you guys who hate serbians for no apparent reason.

Illyrianism was hijacked by new romatnic nationalists and gypsies.

You say most socialist states have not achieved ideal democratic socialism. Which ones have?

None, because they are always targeted with coup d'états before they can fully develop (usually instigated by the US).

The worst geopolitical disaster of the 20th century.

Cope, in your Parlament literally nobody voted for the language to be called Croatian, slavshit

blood is thicker than water

Yes, of course! Your current income far more defines who you are than thousands of years of heritage
Fucking clown retard
The biggest, most unaddressed problem in all political theory is that other people do not define themselves by their asset ownership, and you do. Nothing you want will ever happen because you live in pieces of paper.

If they can’t stand against foreign influence, open or hidden, the system has an obvious, gaping flaw, doesn’t it?
Yet again, this is a function of living on paper arguments instead of in reality.

So your ideas about socialism minimizing ethnic tensions are purely theoretical? Good to know.

Not true. It was the chetniks and ustase leftovers that hated everyone else and acted as agents of foreigners, sabotaging progress. They should have been killed instead of being allowed to breed and be forgiven. There would be no brother wars without imperialism, because people are more likely to benefit from horizontal commerce than vertical exploitation and war

What about the United States currently being subverted? Its not able to withstand this. US only did it because they used stolen wealth from the global south to fund their imperialism.
No, you can see it in practice. It works until socialism is overthrown.

I have no idea of which fakery you talk. The closest thing to that was voting in favour of keeping Latin as the official language to prevent Magyar scum to imposing their Asian language on us