Continuing from last night: popa

Leftists use the word "racist" to instantly shut down inconvenient discussions and destroy reputations. The strength in the word is that its definition can be bent and molded into whatever is convenient at the time. Last night, I proposed a concept for a counter-narrative: popa. Popa is an acronym which stands for "pedophile or pedophile adjacent."

"Pedophile adjacent" is vague and flexible, while still being meaningful enough to evoke a response in the public. Leftists constantly consume media created by pedophiles or those who travel in pedophile circles. They watch shows like Euphoria and Skins, which depict underage people having sex, sometimes with adults. They support progressive social policies such as LGBT sex education for children, which enable and encourage child sexuality. Even if they don't personally support or consume these things, they are awfully quiet about their opposition to them. Calling these people "pedophile adjacent" is not even a lie.

>what is the point?
To start, literally every single elite in Hollywood, DC, and Manhattan is a popa, right off the bat. In Hollywood, they've all either defended Roman Polanski (or someone similar), worked with him, or frequently associate with the aforementioned. Joe Biden is a popa, and so are most political figures. This could put pressure on public figures to sever their social relationships.

>how is it pronounced?
Pope uh

>why not just call them pedos?
They're not pedos, just like most right-wingers aren't racists (though they should be). The goal is to create an umbrella term which will cause the public to gradually associate the "pedophile adjacent" with pedophiles themselves.

>the right has pedos too
This is a good opportunity to do some house cleaning.

>I don't like the acronym
Not married to it. As long as it's short, snappy, memorable, and associates the pedophile adjacent with pedophilia itself, it will be effective.

Attached: image1.gif (278x249, 3.89M)

The term you're looking to create needs to end in a hard consonant, otherwise you sound weak saying it.

You think that's why they use the -ist model? You could be onto something there.

Bump

Attached: popa.png (2250x2250, 1.1M)

Attached: Science.jpg (824x960, 48.9K)

Um racist sexist homophobic much? I literally can't even can't even right now.

bump

Thanks user, bumping again. Last night's thread took some time to get going too.

Yep

Seriously

Listen


There is no one in charge, just a narrative.

The only truth is the story that is told.

Belief in this story is our present reality.

Change the narrative through effective rhetoric, tell a compelling NEW story and you will alter history

Bet

That's the idea, friend. Pedophiles are below racists on the hierarchy of the pariahs, and everyone knows it.

Good idea, but I don't think popa is the right word. If people have to ask how to pronounce it, it sort of defeats the purpose. maybe Choma Child Molester Adjecent since Chomo exists already

People were mentioning chomo last night but I found it to be a bit too regional. There are billions of people who would need to be explained what a chomo is.

My proposed line of attack is with simple, straightforward memes like . I'm currently doing some morning chores, but when I finish, I'm going to make the image more properly centered and make the file size smaller. I'm also going to make variations with various Hollywood figures.

tldr

Attached: thot-patrol-duckface-violation.webm (480x480, 1.6M)

When someone says something is racist, the correct response is to say, "That's irrelevant. What matters is whether it's true. So is it true?" They will keep dodging that issue, but keep pushing it.

That's the primary debate: what matters? Whether something is racist (i.e., immoral), or whether something is true?

I actually like the idea
Those who control the language control the culture

>tl;dr:
"racism" is a word that has no intrinsic meaning or value. it only exists to shame opponents into submission.
you dont need a fucking blog post to explain how the left is anti-individualist. these thing have been known for centuries now.
>anti-individualists who dont believe in human rights rape children for fun
imagine my shock.

Attached: 1646524169920.gif (350x368, 1.99M)

When someone calls you racist, they're not trying to debate you. They're trying to destroy your reputation and end the discussion, because they're afraid of onlookers (usually online discussions like forums and social media) hearing something that could damage their agenda. The time for arguments is over. Trying to debate with people bent on rhetorically destroying you is bringing a plastic straw to a gun fight.

>Those who control the language control the culture
This

I unironically like Roman Polanski, Woody Allen, and Kevin Spacey and am unashamed to say it publicly. I don't this this gayops shit will work because I'm sure there are plenty of people like myself who don't give two shits whether someone is a pedophile.

I'm not whining about the word racist, I'm proposing our own "racist."

I actually understand your sentiment, but not a lot of the people you described would be willing to publicly announce their position, for the same reason most people don't want to be generally perceived as a racist.

Attached: 6AA4A632-22DE-4619-9074-74E739D2F499.jpg (500x1024, 131.07K)

Pedoist?

Popa just sounds weak

They're not pedos, they are "pedo adjacent."

>using kike methods against kikes
is like wrestling with pigs in shit. you will only get dirty and the pigs will love it.
the only way to beat kike methods is to shine a light on their true intentions.

Attached: npc.jpg (441x640, 46.15K)

Whites have higher verbal IQ's than kikes. Kikes fear nothing more than whites using their tactics better than they do. That's why they attack "fascists" and generally ignore libertarians and conservatives by comparison. Adapt or die.

Sounds like you are more than adjacent. Remember pedos and their fans get the rope when this all collapses

Attached: 1598790858120.png (429x535, 121.06K)

>adapt
by using methods that were engineered to destabilize society?
the fact that you think this level of kikery is so intrinsic to society that it is something to be adapted to instead of rooted out and destroyed is evidence that you are demoralized.

Attached: 1644543058425.jpg (800x995, 141.91K)

>by using methods that were engineered to destabilize society?
Yes, destroy and destabilize this society, but not in the way they want to. They want to degrade it and turn it into a workhorse for their global interests, I want to eliminate it entirely so we can build anew. They rely on the society having a degree of stability for their agenda. Turning the entire political discourse into "racist!" "pedo!" "racist!" "pedo!" would create a society that isn't stable enough to support ZOG.

Attached: stopped_talking.png (2434x2110, 1.09M)

Well, hope you enjoy spending time with them in Hell

POPS
Pedophile or Pedophile Skirting

I think adjacent is better than skirting, but that doesn't mean we can't or shouldn't make the acronym more effective.