What does this even mean?

They mean low-yield.

Tactical nukes.

isnt this a satire account

TACTICAL NUKE!!! INCOMING!!!

Btw this is a literal joke account

Google it. You can make nukes with out high levels of Radiation. they leave the radiation in so it can spread and hurt as many people as possible.

gand fategi abb aur kya benchod

are they like uranium bullets that the US use?

they got a killstreak of 30

Fake but low-yield is probably the term the totally legit honestly analyst was reaching for.

it means free bacon, baked yet need no oven

True if big

>what mean
Pocket nuke. Less than a kiloton each

small load big boom

Putin got a fucking 25 killstreak, its over for Ukraine
How could team reddit let this happen I thought they were good at wars and always winnin??

It means get comfy:

youtube.com/watch?v=sBuItN46zjE

Most people don't understand just how varied nuclear payloads are. Fat man and little boy were 20 and 15 kilotons respectively. You can make fission bombs as low as 1 kiloton or smaller. By contrast, ICBMs are typically loaded with multiple thermonuclear warheads that each have a yield in the hundreds of kilotons, and that's just because it distributes the damage better than the ten megaton range explosion that you can easily get out of a thermonuke.

Shitty word-smithing by idiot journos, nothing more.

Attached: headshake.gif (226x226, 386.55K)

They can be useful for cleaning big cities. This is the reason nazis dont want civilians to leave

GET REKT
bitchute.com/video/p55ZmvAcyjOt/

Attached: TaylorTopHat.jpg (1088x1500, 202.11K)

It means their turning Ukrainian Military Bases to dust. That's what tactical Nukes are for after all. Could snowball into something bigger thought and that's what I'm hoping for.

It’s satire, memeflaggot

Röntgen or it won't happen!

Attached: 1604243719807.jpg (514x623, 117.3K)

I dont want to set the world on fire....

Do any of you faggots have a link to prove or disprove this?

Google, duckduckgo, and even yahoo search bring up nothing related

You are all dumb. It's a nuclear weapon with a low explosive yield that is deployed to change a tactical short term situation rather than a strategic one. Strategic is all out nuclear war, tactical is to win a specific battle or engagement. Tactical nuclear weapons have never been deployed ever.

It means run and never look back

its real in my mind

They can do that with artillery.

Fast missile tac nukes might be poppes on those huge convoy streams of weapons NATO is sending, would be kino AF

every explosion/fire is a nuclear reaction.

Attached: 0414B6-1024x538.jpg (1024x538, 99.13K)

it was revealed to me in a dream

>What does this even mean?
Mininukes.
And btw you fucking newfag retards are stinking up this fucking board just leave already.

Attached: i-just-nuked-this-thread.jpg (1200x837, 136.99K)

False flag provocation most probably incoming. Russia is not in dire need (yet) for such escalation.
>Russia has announced
Source pls.

14 Röntgen

Attached: 1646354335790.jpg (1881x1671, 1.31M)

If OP is not fake and gay then I'd say that those tactical nukes are going to be artillery exclusive

This. Look up what a Davy Crockett is.

Attached: DavyCrockettBomb.jpg (800x640, 253.59K)

>tactical
For use in destroying enemy military forces engaged in or near actual fighting, as opposed to strategic uses like destroying cities.

>low grade
Of a relatively small explosive power. Strategic nukes are usually ~100 kilotons to a few megatons. This is probably referring to something in the low kiloton or even sub-kiloton range, like the Davey Crockett. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_(nuclear_device) It could possibly refer to a neutron warhead, which sacrifices explosive power for enhanced neutron radiation, which makes it more effective against armored vehicles.

fake and gay

Attached: 36489346586.gif (127x139, 474.33K)

Anyways as soon as their is conscription I'm going to fight for Israel.

I’m scareded anons

Attached: 6BFA64B3-BF10-4BBE-A119-9C5E6A203147.jpg (793x786, 61.69K)

>SpecialNewsDesk
Is this your account?

>that pic
litloling

> Russia has announced it will use tactical low grade genocide on Ukraine.

"Hey guy, I will just use a tiny little nuke okay?"
"Ok maybe this time I use slightly larger, but still tiny nuke yeah?"
"Maybe just a bit larger this time, just to wipe out this small village."
. . .
"Maybe I just nuke Kiev real quick?"

Its probably gonna get a little warmer.

It means Jewish agitprop, you dunce. Kikes will string tons of words together in their sentences (this is a cornerstone od their faggy Oral Law) so you stop paying attention halfway through and quietly mentally concede to them to get them to go the fuck away.

Nope. Thermobarics do the same without the fallout. If they "really" need tac nukes its to put them on missiles and nuke any place anywhere.

Not some joke ass UA base lol, these guys might not even have an army anymore

>links
just take a nap

Man can a nigga get a verified source instead of some screen from "NEWS". notevenbait.jpg

>We
A fucking leaf, what you shithole can do about that? Thrown dildos on Russian embassy?

Tweet source twitter.com/SpecialNewsDesk/status/1500190527194607618

Though not sure if real though.

b-but we banned him from twitter

Big boom, less radiation.

russia shuts off you

Only a few kilotons. Not great. Not terrible.

Attached: 1646469355125.png (1093x685, 197.6K)

op if you are the one running the special news desk account it's hysterical and keep up the good work.
t. one of your devout followers

But I thought Liechtenstein was gonna save us all?
What happened to your army?

Don't worry lil' fren. Here's all you need to know.
youtube.com/watch?v=m6U9T3R3EQg

Friendly reminder that tactical nukes were first authorized to use by US senate in 2003, then used against Afghanistan, Irak, Syria, Lebanon, even Yemen through Saudi-niggers.
This is documented, tactical nukes leave low radiation on the point of explosion, the US have been using them, i dont see why Russia shouldn’t use them against the Ukraine zio-nazis.
aip.org/fyi/2004/senate-authorizes-nuclear-weapons-research-initiatives

Davy Crockett is a 20 ton, no kilo, nuke that's fired from an infantry carried recoilless rifle.

Oh wait, it's just fake news. Nothing to see here...

More like the special needs news desk LMAO

I love him too

I bet Russia is gonna nuke the moon tomorrow

Cruise missiles with low yield nuclear heads. Most likely with airborne mid-altitude detonations to prevent radioactive dust clouds. Still, hundreds of thousands will die with such detonations.

Ukrainians are go to blow up their own nuclear power plants and claim all th eradiation is from a Russian mini-nuke.

They're not going to nuke territory they intend to occupy. This isn't the 1940s, we know how radiation works now. Russia themselves even sacrificed an entire division testing it.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totskoye_nuclear_exercise

Like say, a neutron bomb.

Finally a nigger who can into nukes.
Soviet and then Russian military doctrine says nukes are just another weapon to use. Just don't use it against NATA members, their doctrine is to nuke back.

It means your gay twitter screencap propaganda has gotten even more retarded.

Low yield = less than 10kt bomb. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were 13kt and 19kt respectively

It's 2022. We make it up as we go.

The lowest yield nuke ever was 1kt

Russians capped the plants. This is where being the "good guy" might hurt Russia because they are still running the plants instead of shutting them off, so if Ukrainians manage to asplode something it wont be good

They are scalating force because they know they are losing

What reason is that? Are they scared of your tranny chair force sending low grade Chinese weapons in their general direction only to fall pathetically into the sea? DEATH TO AMERICA

If true, big. Wow

POST A FUCKING LINKF YOU DICKLESS FUCKING COCKSUCKER

it means the nuke is smaller than other nukes of conventional grade. it's smaller bomb. Still bad bomb.

youtube.com/watch?v=M_A5yec7nB4

pls be true

Attached: 16464916191961.jpg (480x480, 51.8K)

>wkikshit

Nuke fallout is overrated by green retards so nobody thinks of "just" nuking up all the top 500 most polluting cities on the llanet for example.

After a year you can walk 100m around the crater without a gas mask

Thank you user

As soon as there's conscription, they can fucking try and find me.

Attached: gun.jpg (900x900, 154.17K)

How small can you make a nuke?

End of the word if true. So yeah. Its pretty fucking big if true.

HAPPENING

Attached: file.png (768x287, 33.55K)

Suitcase nukes are a thing

>It’s not kiev or Kyiv, it’s simply Russia.

God damn I haven’t laughed that hard in ages

Attached: 747C97C2-70FB-4403-BB82-127B792251E0.jpg (1170x717, 277.78K)

It's fake

Attached: nope~2.png (1080x972, 397.95K)

>If OP is not fake and gay then I'd say that those tactical nukes are going to be artillery exclusive
That fits with how the war in the Ukraine is a demonstration of Russia's new battle doctrine, where they move around in well defended convoys of tanks, artillery, AA and logistics while they degrade the Ukrainian ability to offer any resistance.

What would happen is the US just launched a full out surprise nuke attack on Russia? Is it possible/

The US version would be something like this:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W80_(nuclear_warhead)

>The W80 is a low to intermediate yield two-stage thermonuclear warhead deployed by the U.S. enduring stockpile with a variable yield ("dial-a-yield") of 5 or 150 kilotonnes of TNT (21 or 628 TJ).

This cope is legendary

suitcase is just a name
the thing is as big as a 30L beer barrel and weighs even more

Utter bullshit.

I made it up.

2s4 Tulypan morter with nuclear 240mm rounds. Been in Donbas since day one. They have used in multiple engagements, however not sure if ever fielded with the nuclear round. Sounds fun