How would the world be different if females ruled it

How would the world be different if females ruled it

Attached: iuiui.png (867x189, 36.7K)

Well women are smarter, so a lot better.

Fpbp

>listening to an old money faggot about anything

If females ruled the world we would still be living in dugout caves in the ground.

Attached: female_led_civilization.jpg (2560x797, 337.46K)

you know how retards around here want to accelerate?
women would actually do it by genociding non-chads and the simps who put them in power
then the chads would usurp them and reinstate patriarchy, slap them around and put them in their place, and they would be happy

Yes but men would be conscripted to engineer the grass huts and dug out caves while women would take the credit.

pretty sure Nancy Pelosi and Kamala Harris both have kids. try again.

We alreadyknow the answer to that.

There were TONs of female lead, matriarchal groups.

Literally none of them got out of hunter gatherer. Matriarchal philosophy is incompatible with civilization.

Total hell. Women act on emotions. The world would already be destroyed by nukes.

mothers, but the feminists and faggots aren´t mothers, they are just fuckholes

Europe used to be run by women, and all the men were forced to sleep in longhouses. It is a period of time of which no culture remains, at all. Everything of value in Europe was made by men.

No different, because they do

>> oy vey

Objectively false

Attached: history.jpg (1307x815, 438.73K)

Men would just take it over again.

they would wage wars over inane shit like "this other world leader wore the same dress"

We'd be somewhere closer to WWV right about now

I do not obey women. Women obey me.

Attached: 1646185259454.jpg (540x720, 27.05K)

Now show the pic of him as a child with his mom.
Or the one with him and the child doll.

Attached: 1641581937145.webm (640x424, 1.1M)

How much did the VPN cost?

Don’t forget funny too

>How would the world be different if females ruled it
it would be the same.

You can't post using a VPN.

Attached: Screenshot_20220304-105931.png (1080x1247, 1.02M)

This works, in theory. But then you have to account the third world baboon invaders that see feminized countries as a rape opportunity.

Gee I wonder how Israeli shills get the Mutt flag

Go find a female ruler that didnt start a war I DARE YOU

> moms rule the world
> 7 layers of clothing become mandatory because it's cold outside

It's true, by nature women do not like taking risks. A requirement to advance civilization.

moms ruled the world during the "pandemic" and they locked up entire countries so they wouldn't get a cold.

Attached: mrswatson.jpg (950x1344, 265.53K)

>What world? There would be no world.

>genocide non chad
Closeted Any Forumsacks like this seriously believe 1/5 of men could kill the other 4
You are a loser and have clearly never been in nor seen a real fight. Three average men could beat the living shit out of almost any individual outside of your action movies and that’s before we factor in tech, which betas create more often than chads

Something like this

Attached: 1528025874510.jpg (740x497, 408.32K)

>How would the world be different if females ruled it
Honnest answer, we would still be in caves. Nothing would get done. Every decision would require the queen bee and followers to agree in lock step, dissenting females would need to be ostracised from the group through passive agressive exclusion tactics, then when the queen bee got her period, she would make an irrational emotional decision that would jeopardize the future of the group and and the other high clique females would plot to step in to take over her position.
It would play out like a high school movie, they would even all share a single Chad and exclude all the other men.

We wouldn't even have nukes

Women would start wars with each other over petty bullshit.
>woman president sees Vice documentary showing a crying Pakistani gay couple lamenting that they can't get married
>immediately declares war on Pakistan
>Pakistan deploys entire nuclear arsenal on DC right as troop (male) drop into Islamabad
>US goes full Samsom Option
>entire world cloaked in radiation
>woman president becomes sex-slave for whatever warlord takes over the DC area

so is he dead?

Shut up women are funny. Get over it.

We would absolutely still be sleeping in huts and fighting over rotting meat.

Women have no concept of the equilibrium of terror. They love to LARP as peace lovers, but a world led by women would be constantly at war. They are emotional, hold grudges for unholy amounts of time, and have zero concept of diplomacy. Imagine the hellhole

>doesn't specify what "different" means
kek, he's based

If women leaders develop a maternal relationship with their subjects they probably get quite vicious towards those who they think threaten or insult them.

They've ruined it much faster

It would be a lot different, not better, but definitely different.

This.
You people are saying that giving women the power of governace will lead us to gay peace or something, while you forget how once per month, every woman loses their shit and becomes murderous and violent.
And we have nukes now.

Attached: 1635841929217.gif (200x200, 3.89M)

Humans would’ve died out long ago.