Why isn't kiev captured already

why isn't kiev captured already

Attached: 218.jpg (976x850, 61.9K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=9WWs5AxGRVY
youtu.be/OTwl5b9BrIw
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

What's the moral of the Hare and the Tortoise story?

why are you retarded?

youtube.com/watch?v=9WWs5AxGRVY

I don't think you understand what "capturing" a modern metropolis entails.

TRUST THE PLAN

just capture it bro

>*eats anti-tank rocket*

recent officials from the kremlin have cited "lag" the past few days with a source close to Putin's administration quoting "these servers fucking suck"

It's called Kiyvfefe

It's keev you chud.

>why isn't kiev captured already

ukrainians fought back

Attached: 1646181733469.jpg (820x823, 105.06K)

Russian efficiency and essentially a reliance on WW2 tactics and logistics. I thought they advanced like the west did but clearly that didn't happen.

Apparently neither did Putin since he thought multiple cities would be captured in day 1.

I think you'll find its pronounced Keith

Our plan is just to charge along this well defined path and get shot up like a bunch of idiots! It worked in ww2 my guys!

They spent all the fuel on keeping warm and now they have to refuel 1200 vehicles in a line while keeping the refueling trucks going too. Meanwhile spending more fuel to keep warm, this is such a strategic fuck up that it makes me question the brains behind the operation.

Google Battle of Grozny (1999–2000).

It has 3 million people in it and most of them are not happy to be "liberated".
Also the Russians are trying to not appear like absolute subhumans because the whole world is watching so they're not shelling it like they like to do.

Cutting up their logistics and communications, which is way easier nowadays than yesteryear because now supply systems are on-demand, which means you could perfectly leave the population without them in one week.

Putin doesn't want Kiev. He wants a deal keeping NATO nukes out of his backyard. If Biden can agree to that, he will leave Ukraine.

very symbolic city, you just can't take it as a random village
you want to keep the cheery on top of the cake for the last moment
captcha: YAYVH = YHWH

>why isn't kiev captured already
because it's a fiery but mostly peaceful war
>why isn't Russia sending in artillery to pound the cities into dust
because that's not their objective, retard

Two weeks user.

It's Kyiv pronounced Queef

They are surrounding it and taking it slowly, their intention isn’t to kill civilians or even the ukranian military they just want to capture it. If they wanted they could completely destroy ukraine but they are just CAPTURING it.

OI
KEEF
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

Because Rusbro shit gets shot down
youtu.be/OTwl5b9BrIw

Attached: 1646137655198.png (600x663, 459.38K)

Show me when that worked in war and how the Russians are being steady. They're flailing around like a jackass.

Attached: 1646357868341.jpg (1024x1024, 375.85K)

Because Russian generals are completely dumb. Even when I was 11 I managed the logistics of my army better in Advance Wars, and didn't fall into obvious traps like that column that is now stalled because they didn't account for bridges being blow up behind them and before them.

By next week, once they're all starved, we should hear about reports of cannibalism among their troops.

Attached: laugh.png (912x905, 1.23M)

Why didn't Russia just nuke Kyiv a month ago while the city was still full of civilians?

Attached: BLM.jpg (1074x1074, 227.4K)

I captured a chicken and garlic Kiev in my tummy for din dins and will soon deposit the dead civilians at sea.

nuke is a psyop

>their intention isn’t to kill civilians or even the ukranian military they just want to capture it
Yes the leveled city centers clearly back this up. I know when you want to protect civilians you drop cluster bombs on markets, hit apartment buildings with missiles and bring in chechens and thermobaric weapons. I mean being nice means you use weapons that cause the most casualties.

2 more weeks

le amerigo cope