Finally someone speaking what need to be said

i ran out of place to shit and i found this place its comfy here

US Jewish oligarchs engineered this crisis with the Jewish oligarchs in Russia and the Jewish oligarchs in the Ukraine

Why did Ukraine want to join NATO? Nobody put a gun to their head to force them. If the Ukrainian people decided that their future was brighter by aligning themselves with the EU instead of bum ass Belarus and the rotting corpse of Russia then why is that so wrong?

Weidel is based.

>This really is a conflict perpetuated by the U.S against two brothers.
And they kept this war in their back pocket since 2014, just waiting for the right time to play it. I believe the plan was for Hillary to win in 2016, then start the war and have it go nuclear to depopulate the earth. Trump fuck all that up, and after all, he cared more about serving his ego than his country OR some cabal plot, so he had to be expelled like a foreign object ASAP while the plan got delayed.

she worked for goldman sachs and is a lesbian.

She is a right wing lesbian living in Switzerland. Also she wants shitskins to be deported. I'm glad you support her agenda.

>and is a lesbian
Hot

>conflict perpetuated by the U.S against two brothers
and fucks euro
it's a win-win-win for them

This whole thing stinks to high heaven, perhaps now that people are expecting Jews to start another war (like they always do), we will actually be looking at the right things, and with a healthy distrust of Jews, finally catch them in the act.

>OH but Ukraine's revolution is legitimate, its not U.S regime change
>relevant links
oscepa.org/en/news-a-media/press-releases/press-2010/international-observers-say-ukrainian-election-was-free-and-fair

Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych was not an admirable character. After his election in 2010, he used patronage and other instruments of state power in a flagrant fashion to the advantage of his political party. That high‐handed behavior and legendary corruption alienated large portions of Ukraine’s population. As the Ukrainian economy languished and fell farther and farther behind those of Poland and other East European neighbors that had implemented significant market‐oriented reforms, public anger at Yanukovych mounted. When he rejected the European Union’s terms for an association agreement in late 2013, in favor of a Russian offer, angry demonstrators filled Kiev’s Independence Square, known as the Maidan, as well as sites in other cities.

Despite his leadership defects and character flaws, Yanukovych had been duly elected in balloting that international observers considered reasonably free and fair—about the best standard one can hope for outside the mature Western democracies. A decent respect for democratic institutions and procedures meant that he ought to be able to serve out his lawful term as president, which would end in 2016.

Neither the domestic opposition nor Washington and its European Union allies behaved in that fashion. Instead, Western leaders made it clear that they supported the efforts of demonstrators to force Yanukovych to reverse course and approve the EU agreement or, if he would not do so, to remove the president before his term expired. McCain dined with opposition leaders, including members of the ultra right‐wing Svoboda Party, and later appeared on stage in Maidan Square during a mass rally. He stood shoulder to shoulder with Svoboda leader Oleg Tyagnibok

>cont
>Relevant Link
bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957

The extent of the Obama administration’s meddling in Ukraine’s politics was breathtaking. Russian intelligence intercepted and leaked to the international media a Nuland telephone call in which she and U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Geoffey Pyatt discussed in detail their preferences for specific personnel in a post‐Yanukovych government. The U.S‑favored candidates included Arseniy Yatsenyuk, the man who became prime minister once Yanukovych was ousted from power. During the telephone call, Nuland stated enthusiastically that “Yats is the guy” who would do the best job.

Nuland and Pyatt were engaged in such planning at a time when Yanukovych was still Ukraine’s lawful president. It was startling to have diplomatic representatives of a foreign country—and a country that routinely touts the need to respect democratic processes and the sovereignty of other nations—to be scheming about removing an elected government and replacing it with officials meriting U.S. approval.

Washington’s conduct not only constituted meddling, it bordered on micromanagement. At one point, Pyatt mentioned the complex dynamic among the three principal opposition leaders, Yatsenyuk, Oleh Tyahnybok, and Vitali Klitschko. Both Pyatt and Nuland wanted to keep Tyahnybok and Klitschko out of an interim government. In the former case, they worried about his extremist ties; in the latter, they seemed to want him to wait and make a bid for office on a longer‐term basis. Nuland stated that “I don’t think Klitsch should go into the government. I don’t think it’s necessary.” She added that what Yatseniuk needed “is Klitsch and Tyanhybok on the outside.”

she is also together with a currycunt and they adopted 2 sons. she is living the globohomo lifestyle.

>cont
>Relevant link
nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/why-ukraine-dying-slow-death-literally-19529

The two diplomats also were prepared to escalate the already extensive U.S. involvement in Ukraine’s political turbulence. Pyatt stated bluntly that “we want to try to get somebody with an international personality to come out here and help to midwife this thing [the political transition].” Nuland clearly had Vice President Joe Biden in mind for that role. Noting that the vice president’s national security adviser was in direct contact with her, Nuland related that she told him “probably tomorrow for an atta‐boy and to get the details to stick. So Biden’s willing.”

Both the Obama administration and most of the American news media portrayed the Euromaidan Revolution as a spontaneous, popular uprising against a corrupt and brutal government.

A February 24, 2014, Washington Post editorial celebrated the Maidan demonstrators and their successful campaign to overthrow Yanukovych. The “moves were democratic,” the Washington Post concluded, and “Kiev is now controlled by pro‐Western parties.”

It was a grotesque distortion to portray the events in Ukraine as a purely indigenous, popular uprising. The Nuland‐Pyatt telephone conversation and other actions confirm that the United States was considerably more than a passive observer to the turbulence. Instead, U.S. officials were blatantly meddling in Ukraine. Such conduct was utterly improper. The United States had no right to try to orchestrate political outcomes in another country—especially one on the border of another great power. It is no wonder that Russia reacted badly to the unconstitutional ouster of an elected, pro‐Russian government—an ouster that occurred not only with Washington’s blessing, but apparently with its assistance.

Ukraine and Russia have a long history of conflict and joining NATO by definition means member states must be willing to fight on Ukraine's behalf during conflicts. It's a very perilous idea.

But the Dutch people decided they want nothing to do with Ukraine. Wat nou?

putin monke not human
he le bad

Attached: 1645710970253.gif (320x240, 2.09M)

>Relevant Links
off-guardian.org/2022/02/24/timeline-euromaidan-the-original-ukraine-crisis/

If the U.S didn't managed and supercharged Euromaidan and then also managed reconstituting the government that came after, I would say it was all legitimate, yet we have clear evidence that what happened in Ukraine in 2014 was a regime change similarly to operation timber sycamore that Obama also tried to do against Assad but unlike in Syria, they were successful in Ukraine

>This really is a conflict perpetuated by the U.S against two brothers.

especially a white woman

Attached: america ww3 woman.jpg (1848x416, 177.44K)

dilate tranny

POOO

IINNN

THEEE

LOOOO