Is it possible to be both anti-globohomo and pro-capitalism, or is it exclusively an anti-capitalist stance?

Is it possible to be both anti-globohomo and pro-capitalism, or is it exclusively an anti-capitalist stance?

Attached: 1599231391740.jpg (640x618, 89.2K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributism
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Maybe it's time for you to acknowledge that the "free market" is a fantasy?

National Socialism is the closest you’ll get to reconciling the two

All of these small countries that are basically completely ethnically cleansed they all act like a hivemind, it's not like USA or UK or whatever

If you are good at capital, don't care significantly about anti-globohomo until an alternative is in place. The mindset is poison on your social life and your efficiency.

>lists off a bunch of dystopian shit
>"the little things we love"
that's an edit, correct?

You can have whatever views you think are right, but you may need to defend them. Otherwise other people will be able to replace your ideas with their own.

No.

You are chattel to the rich. The rich owned communism, it was their mechanism to undue the anarchistic sentiment of western Europe which was inspiring popular revolts against the gentry and their increasingly obscene control over peoples lives. Under modern capitalism they have just shifted the bill for their fuck ups to a kind of socialized wealth net they can never fall though.
Communism of 40 years ago and this excuse for capitalism we have are exactly the same. Giant mechanisms just to move wealth in one direction towards those who are already the wealthiest beings the planet has ever had.

still won't work, the driving force for inventions is mostly your own interest. Volkische approach may work under war economy but in peace time won't substitute it

What the fuck even is capitalism? Everyone has their own definition.

Here's a less retarded rephrasing of your question:
>is it possible to be pro-market while not being pro-business?

>Think individuals have the inherent right to own property and do with it as they see fit
>Be against an agenda that wants you to own nothing
Yes, it's actually incresibly easy.

Free markets yes, (((capitalism))) no. Ford and Lindbergh were good examples of the first.

Yes goy, you must oppose capitalism. We need a system where you own nothing so you can be happy!

Attached: 1645871413699.jpg (686x685, 110.42K)

Depends how you define capitalism. There's nothing wrong with free trade on a local level. It's when it becomes global and we allow monopolies to form that's the problem. The only way to combat this is with protectionism and anti-trust laws. This is pretty much the economic system America had from 1776-1960.

Attached: taxes3.png (594x455, 70.92K)

This.

jesus fucking mary christ you retarded dichotomy faggots will always be what caused the death of this place. Shut the fuck up shut the fuck up shut the fuck up.
Belive what you want nigger as long as it makes sense to you, just because you believe “A” does NOT necessitate you believe “B” even if you are told it does. Just think for your fucking self you fag ffs
>muh i cant be this way if i think this way
You can lad, who is stopping you?

My dicks hard over all the heads I'm gonna get to chop. Inshalla

>Agreeing with an unabashed jew
So this is what Any Forums has come to

Ted was anti-capitalist.

Pretty much this.
Private property has been the successful bedrock of all great countries, and individuals free to pursue their objectives is what made the British Empire and the USA what they are.

Statism is the greatest threat humankind is facing right now.

>Putin says Ukraine is nationalist
>Putin is against nationalist Ukraine
>Putin is against nationalist
>Russia is globohomo
The facts speak for themselves

Attached: nukemap Moscow.png (1405x960, 683.38K)

Show me where.

Attached: 1613184497975.png (400x400, 288.88K)

Capitalism inevitably leads to globohomo. Who really benefits from capitalism? And no I'm not a communist before any of you fucktards call me that. Capitalism and communism are two different paths to the same place.

All evidence auggest that free market
Capitalism is anti-white. A Chinese model that puta white people before profits and engages in imperialism abroad is the way forward

wdym show you where, his biggest gripe was with the entire industrial revolution, if you don't think that's anti-capitalist i don't know what to tell you
a tip though: anti-capitalist does not mean pro-communist, it just means anti-capitalist; it is possible to be against all forms of bad things instead of just settling for the least bad

Yes its called National Capitalism a.k.a distributism. It was the old world order. It was also called "the american dream" it was cancled in the 50s because it was antisemitic.

Attached: national_capitalismG.png (1817x794, 288.11K)

Read his writtings retarded mutt

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributism

>What they are

Zog shitholes?

He was against technological progress beyond a certain point, yes. What I'm asking you is to show me where he was against owning and trading private property, as that's what capitalism means.

Attached: 1614580209833.jpg (655x655, 116.09K)

Yes. Globo in globohomo is commie construct. Local homo is something i wouldn't worry about.

>364891963
I own everything he's published, memeflag.

Attached: 1633547997999.png (625x626, 102.39K)

Capitalism works just fine under national socialism

National capitalism is not strong enough to fight the international globohomo corporation.

>no property taxes
Stopped reading there

Then you'd know he was an anarcho-primitivist, retard

Based