Member when this was released?
>youtube.com
>"ethnic and racial differences are forced to live together
Where were you when the openly told you that you are being corralled into hive cities? Also, post your memory holes niggers.
THEY DONT WANT YOU TO BE SELF SUFFICIENT.
THEY WANT YOU OFF THE LAND AND COMPLETELY
DEPENDENT.
Other urls found in this thread:
cfr.org
youtube.com
brookings.edu
ecfr.eu
daphne.foundation
youtube.com
cnn.com
gothinkblog.com
advancingjustice-la.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
I'm way past giving a fuck. They have all the power. All we can do is wait for their power to collapse from their own exploitation.
Checked
When right before pandemic hoax all samsung devices wordlwide in the nighttime got their locaLization services remotely switched on
Should be around 2019/early 2020
Yes a similar thing happened with Windows and iOS at a point
That was the beginning of Klaus wolrd
Reminder that Leana Wen is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and a Rhodes Scholar. She also is a World Economic Forum Young Global Leader, and is senior fellow at the Brookings Institute. She also just by chance happened to be an "emergency room physician" at Massachusetts General Hospital treating patients the day of the Boston bombing. What a crazy coincidence, right?
"Beatrice W. Welters
Leana S. Wen
Allan Wendt"
"Dr. Leana Wen is an emergency physician, professor of health policy and management at George Washington University, and a nonresident senior fellow at Brookings Metro and Economic Studies Program. Dr. Wen is also a contributing columnist for The Washington Post, a CNN medical analyst, and author of the critically-acclaimed book on patient advocacy, When Doctors Don’t Listen: How to Avoid Misdiagnoses and Unnecessary Tests (St. Martin’s Press, 2013) and a forthcoming memoir, Lifelines: A Doctor’s Journey in Public Health (Metropolitan Books, 2021).
Previously, Dr. Wen served as Baltimore's Health Commissioner, where she led the nation’s oldest continuously operating health department in the U.S. to fight the opioid epidemic, treat violence and racism as public health issues, and improve maternal and child health.
Dr. Wen obtained her medical degree from Washington University School of Medicine and studied health policy at the University of Oxford, where she was a Rhodes Scholar. Dr. Wen completed her residency training at Brigham & Women's Hospital & Massachusetts General Hospital, where she was a clinical fellow at Harvard Medical School.
A member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Dr. Wen has received recognition as one of Governing's Public Officials of the Year, Modern Healthcare's Top 50 Physician-Executives, World Economic Forum’s Young Global Leaders, and TIME magazine's 100 Most Influential People."
Do you guys remember that Maltese journalist named Daphne Caruana Galizia who was investigating and writing stories about the Panama Papers scandal before she died in a car bombing? I've seen people mention her repeatedly on memoryhole threads.
Well, I just found something interesting, guys. So, I was doing some research going through the membership roster of the European Council on Foreign Relations. For those not aware, the European Council on Foreign Relations is the shadow government Round Table Group of the European Union; think of it like the Council on Foreign Relations in America or Chatham House in the UK. George Soros actually helped fund and co-found the European Council on Foreign Relations and is a member along with his son.
Anyway, I'm going through their roster, and it turns out one of her sons named Matthew Caruana Galizia is on their membership list. He's also the co-founder of the Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation in his mother's memory. What the fuck is going on?
Malta
Matthew Caruana Galizia – Co-founder, Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation
Montenegro
Srđan Darmanović – Professor at the Faculty of Political Science, University of Montenegro; former Minister of Foreign Affairs
Ivan Vuković – Mayor of Podgorica
"COUNCIL OF ADMINISTRATION
The members of the Foundation's administrative council are the founders: Daphne's husband and sons Peter, Matthew, Andrew and Paul Caruana Galizia. Peter Caruana Galizia is the first chairman of the council.
Peter is a law partner at BCGL Advocates in Valletta, Malta, Matthew is the Director of the Foundation, Andrew is a Global Leadership Fellow at the World Economic Forum in Geneva and Paul is an editor at Tortoise in London.
Our deed of foundation requires that the council is made up of at least three people, who are unpaid."
Lou Dobbs reported on and warned the American People about the coming North American Union and the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America on CNN. He warned about how this regional integration would threaten American national sovereignty. Within that same month, somebody did a drive by shooting at Lou Dobbs' house.
Lou Dobbs: North American Union Exposed
youtube.com
"(CNN) -- A gunshot struck the home of CNN anchor Lou Dobbs this month, and police in New Jersey are trying to determine whether the bullet was fired intentionally or was a stray.
State Police Sgt. Steve Jones said Thursday that his department received a call from Dobbs' wife, who heard a shot and said a bullet hit her house. Jones said she had been outside her house with "an employee who worked with Dobbs" at 10:25 a.m. October 5.
There were no injuries in the incident, which occurred in a small community in northern New Jersey.
Dobbs, who has been a vocal critic of illegal immigration, is the anchor and managing editor of CNN's "Lou Dobbs Tonight." He mentioned the incident on his radio show Monday, saying it comes amid an "atmosphere" of hostility from groups toward his stance on illegal immigration."
RED DEER
TWO MORE WEEKS
Remember that one? One of the many embarrassments that the antivax virgins of Any Forums are trying to memory hole.
Creating a North American Community. Chairmen’s Statement. Independent Task Force on the Future of North America. Sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations in association with the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales and the Canadian Council of Chief Executives.
gothinkblog.com
Chairs: John P. Manley, Pedro Aspe, and William F. Weld
Vice Chairs: Thomas P. d’Aquino, Andrés Rozental, and Robert A. Pastor
Trinational collaboration is essential to ensure regional prosperity and security. Although there are some issues where bilateral cooperation has historically been much more intense—such as U.S.-Canadian military-to-military cooperation—there are many more issues for which a trinational approach would be beneficial. Shared concerns range from regional economic competitiveness to law enforcement, from energy security to regulatory policy, from dispute resolution to continental defense.
North America, moreover, is quite different from other regions of the world and must find its own cooperative route forward. A new North American community will not be modeled on the European Union or the European Commission, nor will it aim at the creation of any sort of vast supranational bureaucracy. Our vision of North America is one of three sovereign states whose formal collaboration must reflect their mutual interdependence while respecting their differences.
We focus our recommendations on the creation of a single economic space that expands the economic opportunities for all people in the region, and the establishment of a security zone that protects the region from external threats while facilitating the legitimate passage of goods, people, and capital.
We make six key recommendations:
1. Create the institutions necessary to sustain a North American community. We propose that the trinational summit become a regular event. Annual summit meetings among the three countries of North America will demonstrate the strategic importance of the North American community. We propose further the establishment of a North American Advisory Council to prepare and monitor action to implement the decisions made at these summits.
2. Immediately create a unified North American Border Action Plan. The threat of international terrorism originates, for the most part, outside of North America. Our external borders are a critical line of defense against this threat. Any weakness in controlling access to North America from abroad reduces the security of the continent as a whole and exacerbates the pressure to intensify controls over intracontinental movement and traffic, which increases the transaction costs associated with trade and travel within North America. The governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States should articulate as their long-range goal a common security perimeter for North America. In particular, the three governments should strive toward a situation in which a terrorist trying to penetrate our borders will have an equally hard time doing so no matter which country he elects to enter first. Like free trade a decade ago, a common security perimeter for North America is an ambitious but achievable goal that will require specific policy, statutory, and procedural changes in all three nations, including: • Harmonization of visa and asylum regulations, including convergence of the list of “visa waiver” countries;
• Harmonization of entry screening and tracking procedures for people, goods, and vessels (including integration of name-based and biometric watch lists);
• Harmonization of exit and export-tracking procedures;
• Full sharing of data about the exit and entry of foreign nationals; 10
• Joint inspection by the three countries of container traffic entering North American ports, building on the Container Security Initiative between the United States and Canada; and
• A commitment to a common approach to international negotiations related to global movement of people, cargo, and vessels.
Enhance law enforcement cooperation. The security cooperation of the three countries should also extend to cooperation on counterterrorism and law enforcement and could include the establishment of a trinational threat-intelligence center, the development of trinational ballistics and explosives registration, and joint training for law enforcement officials from the three countries, among other measures. Rapid progress in trilateral law enforcement cooperation will be possible only insofar as the respective governments protect the integrity of their public institutions and root out any systemic corruption that may exist.
Expand defense cooperation. In addition to strengthening cooperation among counterterrorism and law enforcement agencies in all three countries, it is essential to build on the strong foundation of the continent’s existing military agreements. The most important step is to expand the binational North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) to make it a multiservice Canadian-U.S. command with a mandate to protect the maritime as well as air approaches to North America. In addition, Canada and the United States should invite Mexico to consider more extensive information-sharing and collaborative planning involving military organizations to build mutual trust and perhaps pave the way for more cooperation in the future.
3. Adopt a common external tariff. We recommend that the three governments begin by harmonizing external tariffs on a sector-by-sector basis to the lowest prevailing rate consistent with multilateral obligations. They should begin with goods on which current tariffs are closest, then proceed to close larger gaps, with the goal over time of adopting a common external tariff, thus eliminating the need for complex and costly rules of origin. We recommend that the three countries enter into negotiations in an effort to find a joint approach to unfair trade practices and anti-competitive behavior, 11 including dumping. We call for creating a permanent roster of panelists for the NAFTA ad hoc dispute-resolution panels to improve consistency, predictability, and efficiency.
The three countries should accelerate and expand implementation of existing “smart border” action plans to facilitate intra–North American travel and commerce. The three countries should develop a secure North American Border Pass with biometric identifiers. This document would allow its bearers expedited passage through customs, immigration, and airport security throughout the region. Over the longer term, it should be possible to rethink fundamentally the systems for national control of intracontinental travel and trade. This will be particularly true if the three countries make genuine progress toward establishing a common security perimeter. North America is different from Europe, of course, but it is instructive that the members of the European Union have managed largely to eliminate physical border controls. The governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of traffic, travel, and trade within North America.
4. Stimulate economic growth in Mexico. To realize the full benefits of economic integration, and to ensure that these benefits are distributed broadly, Mexico must increase and sustain a rate of growth commensurate with its development goals. Mexico must devise a set of policies that commands broad public support and decide on the steps it will take to attract investment and stimulate growth. In conjunction, the United States and Canada should support Mexico by establishing a North American Investment Fund to create infrastructure to link the poorer parts of the country to the markets in the north, and to support education and technical training for Mexican states and municipalities committed to transparency and new development. The fund should be seen as a productive investment by all three countries in the future competitiveness of North America’s economic zone. 12
5. Develop a North American energy and natural-resource security strategy. A reliable supply of key natural resources is essential to the region’s long-term security and prosperity, while respecting each country’s individual policies and priorities. To that end, the three governments should develop a comprehensive joint plan to expand and protect energy infrastructure, fully develop continental reserves, conserve fossil fuels, and reduce emissions. Ultimately, regional collaboration on conservation and emissions could form the basis for a North American alternative to the Kyoto Protocol.
Checked
Also remember when those 2 YouTube glowfags closed the port of Charleston and nothing happened to them
decent thread
bump
thats a pretty stupid clip, i stopped watching 2 mins in when the dude said:
>resources not available due to climate change
yes yes yes and covid will kill us all.
Hive Cities are an unavoidable future, and they will work perfectly, as long as there are people of the same sub-species living inside it.
Thats all there is to it, case closed.
bump 2
One time I was on youtube, and I saw an advertisement from an Asian advocacy group called "Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Los Angeles". It was an animated cartoon, and I decided to watch the entire thing because I was curious. The commercial showed Asian Americans being harassed by clear translucent persons. They never specifically called them "white", but I think they made that artistic choice for a specific reason. They were advocating filming these people committing hate incidents and doxing them online.
So, I decided to do some more research into this group. I went to their website and looked their annual reports to see who was funding this organization. Guess what I found?
The organization is funded by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, and the Open Society Foundations. The same NWO tax-exempt foundations that have been and continue to fund all the BLM adjacent organizations.
"2018 Donors & Supporters*
$1,000,000 +
New Americans Campaign (funded by Carnegie Corporation of New York, Democracy Fund, Evelyn & Walter Haas, Jr. Fund, Grove Foundation, Houston Endowment, JPB Foundation, Open Society Foundations, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Sapelo Foundation, and Wallace H. Coulter Foundation) (in collaboration with Immigrant Legal Resource Center) (’17-’19)"
advancingjustice-la.org
Link to the cartoon advertisement:
youtube.com
So, I go their youtube channel to see if I can find any more content about them, and I click on a random video. There's this Asian woman named Connie Chung Joe who is talking about what "allies" can do for the Asian American community. However, she quickly emphasized that she didn't want people to advocating for increased law enforcement patrols because that will lead to overcriminalization of other communities of color particularly the black community. Instead, she wants to the focus to be on uniting with other minority groups so that they can collectively fight against their shared enemy of white supremacy. I'm not making this up. I'll post the link below.
Almost every single one of these racial advocacy groups and NGOs are funded by the same NWO tax-exempt foundations and think tanks. If you do any kind of hard research into their donors and partners, you will find the following names appear again and again: the Ford Foundation, the Open Society Foundations, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Tides Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and many more.
The point is that these racial social movements are not organic creations spawned from genuine popular uprisings and outrage. They are created, funded and directed by the shadow government think tank/tax-exempt foundation network that runs this world. The Ford Foundation, for example, funds the Latino racial advocacy groups through UnidosUS, formerly National Council of La Raza. None of this nonsense just happened organically. It was all contrived very carefully for the purpose of creating social and civil unrest.