Is NATO the aggressor?

I don't know
Can you repeat the question?

Define "aggression"
Define it as many ways as you can
See if you can come up with a definition that doesn't fit NATOs policy towards Russia

No. To think so is to have a cold war mindset.

It’s funny that everyone on pol dismissed ukraines security concerns and emphasised russias security concerns, when it turns out that all along ukraine was the one with the legitimate fear.

I lost it

Attached: F790C47A-837C-4A7F-A7D5-CA06DA14C1FA.gif (500x211, 524.61K)

no. Putin's only way to take Ukraine was through force. NATO is actually capable of negotiating. Who the fuck wants to join forces with a shithole country like Russia? Exactly. Putin was scared of Ukraine becoming a member of NATO so he's finally decided to take it by force. Taking Ukraine will only harm Russia.

>the action of attacking without provocation, forcefulness
That was easy

>Be Russia
>Talk mad shit for years about your military
>Armatards sucking your dick
>Time to go to war in Ukraine
>Amass a majority of your army on the border
>Launch only a few cruise missiles at the start because your can’t afford to launch too many
>Army immediately starts to get fucked
>16 year olds conscripts running out of fuel
>Your soldiers run away from their vehicles the moment they get shot at
>Cuck cages aren’t working
>Get stuck in mud
>Take worthless objectives
>The internet is flooded with videos of your hardware getting destroyed
>16 year olds start to get captured
>You can’t effectively use your Air Force because your stuck in the 70s when it comes to guided munitions
>Decide that an overwhelming force isn’t what you want for reasons
>Shut down the growing opposition to the invasion within your own country
>Get fucked with the same cyber attack tactics you’ve used against the west
>Deploy the Muslim hordes while claiming to be a sanctuary for Christendom
>Deploy more amartards to /k/ to defend you
>Cripple your economy for generations while you get laughed at by the rest of the world
>Motivate multiple generations of Ukrainians to fight you
>Still claim your not trying to turn Ukrainians agains you even though you’re literally invading their homeland
>Wonder about the horrible fate your saboteurs are facing as they get captured
>Cope by saying your ready for peace talks two days into your full scale war
>Cope harder by threatening Finland and Sweden
>Cope even harder by threaten the west with Nuclear war
>Come to the realization that initiative is difficult to gain back once it’s been lost
>Realize that history is filled with nations making the same mistake you’re making now
>Get your retarded cousin Belarus to come fight by your side
>Say that any pro-Ukrainian propaganda is cope while you push your shitty propaganda
>Still claim that you want regime change while motivating a future

Thanks for baking

but russia is... uh uh against da jooz!

NATO were the aggressors, up until Russia openly invaded Ukraine.

And against the Gay and infinite churka.

Attached: 1645822674873.png (1902x1376, 233.72K)

NATO is the equivalent of an annoying cunt who keeps getting up in your shit harassing you, no matter how much you try to ignore her, until eventually you're basically forced to put the bitch in her place. Who them promptly acts like she's a victim.

starting with cleaning up EU and then later on ukraine

Attached: 2363264.jpg (1640x1640, 1.16M)

NATO is the attack dog for the aggressor, which is the US

Indirectly, for sure.
They've been slapping down installations along the border range for years. Mostly the US.

Imagine if Russia put bases along the Canadian and Mexican borders with the US and in Cuba, then said the US was wrong for putting their country close to countries with russian forces and that reactions were unwarranted.

>without provocation

kek

Mmmm yes

Attached: patrick-bateman-gif-20.gif (500x208, 292.76K)