Ukraine has no chance

Why do people unironically believe Ukraine has a fighting chance against Russia? Their military doesn't come close to having a fighting chance. It's pathetic to believe otherwise.

Attached: 1637713608466.png (748x466, 89.88K)

Pretty much, and we keep hearing about "Russias" losses. The only source being Ukraine.
And they claim they have only lost 600 mostly civilians.
Ukraine is dying. And they are pretending they are not.

Russia is the biggest country in earth they cant just use every soldier to invade ine country

Its hilarious to watch though

Obviously they aren't gonna send 100% of their army to Ukraine, but the point is that they don't need to.

They are supported by NATO. Russia is essentially fighting the U.S. and rest of NATO.

They receive equipment from NATO, not soldiers.

They receive equipment, intelligence, reconaissance, cyber and comms capabilities, everything but NATO boots. U.S. is communicating Russia's every move to Ukrainian generals. Do you realize what a huge advantage that is?

The average Ukrainian is a ghost reaper with 60 confirmed kills, Russia is fucked

Because Javelins and NLAWS btfo any jewtin invader.

>wars all about who has the bigger numbers:)

Literal 13 year old take.

So... basically picrel? Equipment and intel doesn't compensate for lack of man power. You need boots on the ground.
It's hilarious to see all the propaganda about Ukraine BTFO'ing Russia, meanwhile the Ukrainian president is literally calling the invasion a genocide.

Attached: 1636337844092.png (500x746, 453.41K)

>reddit spacing
Go back.

Surr pls

Only until the UN assembly votes for the resolution next week.

Remember Viet-nam ?

>no counter argument

I accept your concession.

What was the military budget of the talibans ?

Why do people unironically believe Afghanistan has a fighting chance against USA? Their military doesn't come close to having a fighting chance. It's pathetic to believe otherwise.

>BIG NUMBER ALWAYS WIN IN WAR
It must be a peaceful existence, floating through life so blissfully ignorant.

Now post Vietnam vs US/Canada or Afghanistan vs US/Canada retard

Australia once lost to emus user
Everything is possible

What argument would that be? "literal 13 year old take"?
Fuck off back to r*ddit, faggot

Attached: 1618782195502.jpg (740x724, 81.58K)

You dont compare just numbers of troups. With regards to that Germany would have lost against french army and the britishers already 1940.

There's a high chance Russia is gonna meme Belarus into attacking too so there's that.

That isn't even Reddit spacing retard. Lurk more faggot

Because quality > quantity

Attached: 088A2034-EA6A-401A-A96D-05811FB9180F.jpg (309x400, 31.03K)

>muh ghost of kiev
>muh Dnipro Transgender snipers
>muh zelensky on the front lines
>muh snake island heroes
>muh general sacrificing himself by jumping into a tank while holding a grenade
>muh prince of kiev, riding on horseback into battle with a lance and splint armour
>muh Magneto of kiev, the kid who ambushed soldiers by dropping kitchenware on them (a body count of 25)
>muh shark of kiev singlehandedly with explosives sinking 30 submarines
>muh citizens stealing fuel from tanks and then destroying them the next day
>muh Iron Man of kiev
>muh Samurai of Kiev, a Japanese ambassador who now wears his ancestors armour.
>muh civilians who killed plain clothes russians (they are actually other Ukranian civilians)
THEY HAVE THE HECKIN AVENGERS ON THEIR SIDE, CHUD

Attached: 1629647687815.jpg (608x856, 128.3K)

I understand words are difficult to grasp for a wojak poster so here goes.
>you think winning a war involves who has the biggest number
>because big number makes brain go yes :)
>but no
>much more involved in win

Have a good day user

talibans where absolutely crushed in the invasion. keeping a land friendly towards their invadors is a completely different thing, and Putins army will be absolutely btfo'd in NATO funded insurgencies if he plans to stay in ukraine after capturing the country

Russia has less than 20% of it's forces involved in this operation aswell.

Because they don't need to "win" in any traditional sense of the word they just need to draw this shit out for like a month until Russia is forced to leave in shame. Forget about kills for a second and look at all the damage Russia has incurred so far. Every 15 minutes another economic domino falls and Russia moves one step closer to becoming North Korea 2.0. They haven't even taken Kiev yet (which they would need to hold, it's not like you take a city and then everything is fine) and the entire world is going ape shit on their economy. It's day 4 and Putin is already making desperate nuclear threats while countries that have been neutral for ages (Sweden etc) feel comfortable dumping weapons into Ukraine. They're going to keep this up for a month? Three months? A year? Ten years? No fucking chance, and that's about how long it would take to fully invade and set up a proper puppet government that can survive without constant Russian military babysitting. Nevermind the fact that American and British glowies are for sure doing a lot of the damage on the ground and Russia can't do jack shit about it because Putin has zero credibility and they can just deny it. When the US wrecks the shit out of a Chechen convoy and says "uhh don't know what you mean bro the Ukrainians did that" what can they do about it? Start a nuclear war? Cry to a completely unsympathetic world audience? Everyone is piling on in a way they never anticipated. It's not Russia vs Ukraine it's Russia vs Everyone.

You're right, numbers don't matter, the heckin' avengers of kyiv are gonna destroy the russian army by themselves alone

Attached: 1629328369918.jpg (772x1016, 40.49K)

Why hasn't Russia captured Kiev?

because wars are almost never won by military might alone

putin deciding to cut his losses and retreating to the original contested areas will already be considered a victory for ukraine

China is not even backing what Russia is doing. When most countries around the world don't like what you are doing. Even if you win, you lose.

Neither did the Vietnamese and yet they beat the yanks. The Afghans beat the Russians too.
Don't analyse war on paper user, you should know better than that.

Attached: FB_IMG_1645823400593.jpg (1080x1350, 123.46K)

Because the war started 3 days ago, you dumb fuck. If they took Kiev in 3 days, it would be very fucking hilarious, though.

Attached: 1618525489590.png (920x600, 551.24K)

>no counter arguments
>just buzzwords
>again

Damn! I didn't expect to win TWO arguments againts you but wow looks like I did :)

Dumb r*dditard you still hasn't made a single argument
>muh 13yr take
>muh numbers don't heckin' matter!!
go back to your shithole

Attached: 1617330548718.png (594x582, 52.2K)

They really made use of those 30 tanks. Goddamn.

Ok argument number 3. Reminder: epic buzzwords means instant loss.
>Vietnam

Ok user you got this.

They could have and should have disabled all power and communications infrastructure before any Russian boots were there on the ground.
Russia’s ego is what caused this to be drawn out
>at least the historical architecture may survive this

Attached: 61C31142-2BEC-4667-A1ED-106AF79BC6F4.jpg (960x641, 115.71K)

>Why do people unironically believe Ukraine has a fighting chance against Russia?
Because they are flaming retards who are easily manipulated by propaganda. (being reprogrammed because they are soulless NPCs.) I recommend euthanasia for such "people."

>Why do people unironically believe

they don't retard, it's textbook propaganda, not reality.

oднa кoпeйкa зaчиcлeнa нa вaш бaнкoвcкий cчeт

Attached: ddd7d7a8db3b595a52c352626f3aaf95c301791ffc422024ea3f55c2f9558a48.jpg (300x263, 16.17K)

Russia should have won already

russians are claiming that they haven't loss anyone which is also retarded

Attached: 1645914423441.jpg (570x441, 33.36K)

Poor Afghan tribesmen stopped both the US and Soviet Union, you think Russia can take on a Ukrainian Insurgency fully backed by NATO?