Is this true? Do men just need to see a naked woman and just have decent thoughts instead?

Is this true? Do men just need to see a naked woman and just have decent thoughts instead?

Attached: file.png (1253x914, 708.43K)

I personally wouldn't want to have to work in an office with an unsightly skank covered in tattoos in eyeshot all day.

>woman in charge of explaining how men's sexual arousement works

Attached: 1476386537958.png (1490x679, 153.29K)

Women can't even understand why they get horny when a man chokes them.

yes, men shouldn't behave like animals.
but women shouldn't behave like object.
act like fucking grown up humans and not monkeys.

If showing skin is so empowering, how come the guy isn't half naked?

she's not wrong. if you get horny cutting an apple you're a freak

Good question.

>woman in charge of explaining how men's sexual arousement works
>woman in charge of explaining
>>woman in charge
Just no.

Men cover their bodies to prevent lust; women should too. If not they shouldn't be allowed to work. It is unprofessional. Deal with it bitches.

God! I hoped Any Forums bullying would make her off herself but this whore never learn

she would be mad that all the men are pussies then, people like her are never satisfied.

What's the difference between parading around half naked versus making a bunch of moaning sounds while drinking, eating, or talking?
>mmmm, ahhhh, slurp slurp, that sounds so mmmmm good
If you're a man, your penis will move. That's how it works. Women know that by dressing a certain way they can control your brain a bit.

>Have decent thoughts.
Why? It's my fucking head. Run around naked for all I care. I'll still have my opinions on the size and quality of your tits.

Attached: 1525474745278.jpg (850x1261, 267.18K)

Toxic female detected. Avoid like the plague.

if a men is lewd verbally, use speech or body language to suggest overtly sexual themes he is bad

If a woman uses visual communication to be lewd or overtly sexual, using or enhancing their bodies to affect mens visual based sexuality then the man is bad

Attached: 1645363358305.jpg (1080x1351, 311.54K)

> walk around almost naked where there are no niggers, indians, arabs or latinos that can assault you
> don’t cause drama over hard dicks
It’s simple.

Women don't internalize it, they use it to knock out competition, "see she is easy, unlike me, give me attention instead to her".

Someone hang this retarded bitch

She draws herself as being far more pretty than she actually is. She already has a distorted image of herself. Predatory men seek out vain women because their insecurity gives men the advantage. Flowers compete for the attention of bees and the success of the flower is rated by the number of bees it attracts. It's considered the same for women who go to great lengths to appear attractive, however now they are trying to also qualify/restrict the attention they want with unadvertised criteria. Women will reject men who would be suitable partners only because they are not as handsome as they'd like, not tall enough, wealthy enough, slim enough, etc. Women are social climbers too, and discard men when seemingly better opportunities come along.

Men need to fix what's wrong with men. But women need to examine their role in perpetuating the unsatisfying relationships they create and fix what is wrong with them.

Yep

What is the point of wearing revealing clothes if not to turn on men

>What is the point of wearing revealing clothes if not to turn on men
To manipulate men and then pretend to be victim. Same scam women have been doing ever since they got undeserved voting suffrage.

No penis, no opinion.

>>woman (...) explaining
St. Paul is seething

Except she doesn't draw herself. She drew herself. Once. And copy pastes it into every new panel. It's gross.

Yes, tell criminals crime is wrong.
Historically this works like magic, and all crime vanishes

>feminists normalizr porn during the sexual revolution
>now they're surprised men are coomers