Is it true that pagans always lose to Christians?

Now that Russia is overtly Christian and Europe and America are both pagan is it true that no pagan force has ever defeated a Christian force in war in all of history?

If so this doesn't seem to bode well for NATO/Ukraine. Thoughts?

Attached: Coat_of_Arms_of_the_Russian_Federation.svg.png (1200x1420, 442.99K)

Other urls found in this thread:

heise.de/tp/features/Immer-erdrueckendere-Beweise-zu-Maidan-Scharfschuetzen-Einsatz-im-Februar-2014-3970907.html?seite=all
reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t2934-complete-list-of-rothschild-owned-and-controlled-banks
britannica.com/topic/Rothschild-family
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_&_Co
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Also which side are the Rothschild and Soros on? NATO?

If so why would Any Forums side with anyone but Russia?

>Europe and America are both pagan

wtf are you talking retard>? there are also christian in America and Europe
go out breath some air stop living under rock

All I have on Christianity, the teachings, morals, philosophy, law, history, origin etc.

History
Christianity being in opposition to jewry:
Pagan gods being the angels
Historical Evidence for Jesus
How Christianity transformed the wold
Correcting claims on common misrepresented parts of the history:
Sodom and Gomorrah
Definitions:
"Dinosaurs", Behemoths and Nephilim
Teachings, Doctrines and Guidelines
Law:
Philsophy:
Pauls work
OT and NT belonging together:
The destruction of the Temple
Logical argument for the christian God
Different teachings within Genesis:
Satanism:
Sun as symbol for God
Purpose behind good and evil
Metaphysics:
Afterlife and Judgementday:
Why Jesus is needed:
Role of the chosen people
Ethnicities
Trivia

Attached: Jesus not nice.jpg (1500x2057, 893.44K)

Rothschild control all private banks even Russia and China
George Soros is platform for funding regime and ideology ngo and some corporate

historically it was usually christians sending some missionaries, those were murdered provoking a battle in which the pagans then lost.
as for who does soros support, im pretty sure both, propping both up to provoke a full scale war, that then destroys everything and afterwards wholr nations can be bought cheaply and put under total control. thats whats done in the middle east and afrika without end, yet now they act as if this is a never seen before violation because its not happening on the other side of the earth and so is entirely hypocritical.
in this one instance russia has at least some justification, but their past also showed they arent entirely trustworthy either and it very well turn out he continues westward after ukraine

Europe and America are Christian? They take LGBT as their primary export along with porn. When have they ever exported anything remotely Christian? Their own countries are decadent shitholes who hate their heritage and ancestors and openly invite Muslim hordes. They are as pagan as a country can get. Attacking gay pride is hate speech and literally equated with violence in most of Europe.

let me give some background on the events leading too this

I think to make a proper evaluation we need to go back to 2014.
The Ukrainian government under Janukovic was pro Russia, providing Russia with a buffer zone between NATO and itself. However there happened a revolution all according to the Soros blue print, and at the height of the events there were snipers on the Maidan shooting onto protesters and police forces alike.
There was an open letter from iirc german ex BND members stating how both got shot by the same, which of course seems to have vanished, but there is
heise.de/tp/features/Immer-erdrueckendere-Beweise-zu-Maidan-Scharfschuetzen-Einsatz-im-Februar-2014-3970907.html?seite=all
talking about how the shooters themselves say they shot on both and were there to escalate the situation.

Now we can savely assume that Janukovic didnt give order to shoot his own forces, the police, nor had interest in escalating the demonstrations against him and thus we can assume, like the testimony of the shooters in the article suggest, that western forces were involved. It worked, Janukovic had to flee the country, and they promptly installed Poroshenko as a puppet, a weapons dealer that happened to be pro EU. With this russia was robbed of the buffer zone, but also Crimea contains an important port for the russian Navy is an access point to the mediterranian sea and thus of strategic importance explaining Russias effort to at least take these back.

1/2

Attached: 1645886995252.jpg (495x393, 77.08K)

sure, if you don't look at the whole chechen war thing.

Not orthodox, didn't read

>Russia is overtly Christian

Attached: 1645807793328.webm (1280x720, 1.87M)

Now while I definitely dont support russian imperialism (as they meddle around in the world history just as much as the USA, funding and supporting the opposite side of the burgers allies every time) we see that clearly the west already showed aggression in this conflict 8 years ago, installing a puppet government.

So whom to support? I would say they both should just fight another, and if russia then plans to continue past those boarders, then we can see further. After all there is a very real possibility they just want to drag the world into another war for another big blood sacrifice of white men.

2/2

>rothchilds control all central banks

Lmao, reductionists like you are retarded, too dumb to handle the intricate complexities influence and power. You puny brain also lump all Jews together.

not all christian are corrupted idiot
even orthodox church and catolich church are corrupted

We're more christian than Russia. Russia is 10% islam.

depends. if we send enough little kids to Ukraine maybe the christians will be to busy raping them so NATO can sneak in.

Attached: 076.jpg (1920x1080, 426.93K)

>he continues westward after ukraine


Good. God curse you retarded germs for holding the throne of satan.

hey retard for you
reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t2934-complete-list-of-rothschild-owned-and-controlled-banks

britannica.com/topic/Rothschild-family

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_&_Co

Pagans are the losers of history, they always lose, to everyone.

>Pagan gods being the angels

Attached: EE54A1A0-C39F-4698-9FB6-D0260665B38B.jpg (218x232, 6.94K)

The best part is where I'm just scrolling along and then I see your posts out of no where. May God bless you, krautbro.

nigger, russia is acorrupz hell hole where you cant bribe your way out of anything if you hsve money. the state is so run down that the youth seeks extravagant ways to kill thrmselves, climbing high buildings and antennas. from what i heard the women are whores too and the country is just a zogged as the rest of us, having holocaust denial outlawed, being in aipac and rothschild central bank.
you idiot fall for hegelian dialectic, like an idiot you are drawn into another war that does nothing but serve thr destruction of people and the take over of nations by zog

thanks user, am always happy when someone likes my posts

as Aquinas said
>In this way, therefore, between us and the highest God, it is clear that they posited four orders, namely, that of the secondary gods, that of the separate intellects, that of the heavenly souls, and that of the good or wicked demons

Attached: credit.png (727x532, 406.34K)

cut up a bit of the quote there
>In this way, therefore, between us and the highest God, it is clear that they posited four orders, namely, that of the secondary gods, that of the separate intellects, that of the heavenly souls, and that of the good or wicked demons. If all these things were true, then all these intermediate orders would be called by us “angels”, for Sacred Scripture refers to the demons themselves as angels. Footnote The souls themselves of the heavenly bodies, on the assumption that these are animated, should also be numbered among the angels, as Augustine determines in the Enchiridion.

So the pagan gods are real then? According to Aquinas. Please be clear.

Europe and america bare atheist not pagan retard.

They don't even control their holiest site

This is the most work a Romanian has ever done in their lifetime

yes, but the worship of them is wrong, a third of them rebelled and became forces of evil corrupting mankind and the stories about them are misrepresented depending on the cults relation to the deities, and their values

They are not real gods because the word God implies omnipotence a God is an entity that is superior to everything else.

So, does that include the entire Hindu pantheon too?

>yes, but the worship of them is wrong, a third of them rebelled and became forces of evil corrupting mankind and the stories about them are misrepresented depending on the cults relation to the deities, and their values
Is this what protestanism does to one's brain?

Attached: 1645585283629.png (1024x1024, 1.22M)