What's the opposite of blitzkrieg?

It took Hitler a month to capture Poland you dumb shill nigger

Grubenkrieg / Trench Warfare, but if you're referring to recent events this doesn't apply to a botched blitzkrieg like it's happening in Ukraine rn, this is far from trench warfare.

>What's the opposite of blitzkrieg?
>Is there a word for that?
Tantric sex

Blitzkrieg but in reverse gear, like WW2 France

It's the day of the internet. We're used to getting results fast.

Sitzkrieg is real, that's how we called the situation on the Maginot line.

I thought it would be comparable to Baghdad in terms of firepower. Battle went on for 6 days and the Iraqis lost 2,000 soldiers, Americans lost 34.

Shitzkrieg

with maximum casualties

>Besieging the Capitol within a day
>Taken thousands of square miles in 3 days
>Bombing all over the country

This is still a blitzkrieg

Mutt admitting that this is normal progress
Never thought I'd see the day. Shills are out in full force pretending like NATO didn't struggle harder against sandniggers with ancient equipment

people's dopamine circuits are burned

giggity

trench warfare

it's called the Vietnam war

Russian invasion?

>op thinks this is slow warfare because HOI4 melted his brain

Attached: 1641131206155.png (1689x1082, 908.79K)

globohomo subversion

>war isnt fast enough
cry more fag

Pootining.

dumblitz

iraqi dawn

Russia will have seized Kiev before a single country manages to send them a single bit of aid.

Let that sink in for a minute.

best way is to starve kiev and just cover the separatist region

A Slow Cosby

quagmire

This feels different. America has always steamrolled everything in their path during their invasions and it's more obvious if you look at the numbers. During the invasion of Iraq they lost 200 soldiers and the Iraqis lost 3,000 despite having a larger army than the Americans brought with them

Sorry, I meant 200 vs 30,000

>capital under siege in 2 days
The actual blitzkriegs of WW2 took weeks, warfare takes longer than a round in a video game.

>What's the opposite of blitzkrieg?

Whatever happened at Afeghanistan when your troops ran away at lightspeed before the enemy comes.

>and it's more obvious if you look at the numbers.
What numbers?
America spent 20 years in Afghanistan and achieved fucking nothing.

Russia has spent two days in the Ukraine and controls more of the country than the Ukraine does.

They're in Kiev right now.

tpbp, that is the correct German term.

being stuck in mud war

Slow your roll bitches, raping ain't easy

Holy shit the fake russian invasion of the ukraine is real and those are totally modern tanks.

Ukranian twatter

In this day and age people can't sit still and keep their attention spans for more than 3 seconds, what the fuck would you expect

Blumenkrieg, I guess.

this

Attached: shit_abyss.jpg (720x904, 34.55K)

>During the interwar period, aircraft and tank technologies matured and were combined with systematic application of the traditional German tactic of Bewegungskrieg (manoeuvre warfare)
>Methods of war have to be chosen between maneuver and attrition warfare.
>Attrition warfare
a few clicks on wikipedia

Attrition war

The kill:death ratio of the early days of the war. Americans lost practically noone and killed thousands of enemy soldiers.

What will happen in 20 years is another discussion

Blitzfrieden. (Thunderpeace), is when you made peace so fast, you caught your winning adversary by surprise. This technique was refined by the french in the last great war.

You mean slow advance or fast retreat?

Blitzsneed

Lmao trust the Jew to get it right but yes, the opposite of blitzkrieg is attritional warfare.

people are dumb and don't know what are they're talking about. Iraqi and Ukrainian society and military are totally different

Afghanistan

Today I witnessed a Jew inside the public library. I tried to supervise his internet activity but he was on to me. We made eye contact and he hissed at me. Is this a ordinary interaction with the Jew?

Attached: 1645832461623.webm (854x480, 1.25M)

I don't think you'll see anything as fast as the early days of Barbarossa again. That's because so many warcrimes were done in the initial stage. Not that most people want to learn, but here goes.
Bombers took of a few hours before the invasion started and than simultaneously, at night, all major cities were bombed severely, over 100 k civilians probably perished in the first few hours at the same time that the main army marched in. This was intentional so that the defending army would not only have to fight, but would have to fight while facing absolute disarray. It's not good strategy as such, but using warcrimes to your advantage. The soviets repaid a fraction, but not all so I wouldn't be surprised to see weird things down the road if Germany escalates with Russia.

Blitzkrieg is a meme among noobs and not something you expect on in a professional world.

Slowendownfluegkrieg