Random soviet building suffers a direct hit by a high-tech missile

Looks like missile payload did not detonate and it's simply impact damage.
Same as few pictures of random missiles stuck in asphalt.
There's probably some failsafe system that prevents detonation if it didn't land where it was meant to.

>What is the official kosher explanation?
you are a conspiracy theorist

air-to-air missiles aren't made to blow up buildings.

This is a Ukrainian building. They showed the footage yesterday. Lmao.

9/11 was an inside job

While airplanes are

But airliners are?

It's less high so there was less of a temptation to build it closer to the limits of what materials can take.

Also while weapons release energy very quickly and that can be obviously destructive by design, a release of *even more* energy a bit slower can also do more damage in the right situation.

glorious ukrainian concrete strong
pathetic american steel weak

It's one of the new fancy buildings, probably from 2005 or so. Apartments in buildings like these are about $500k in Moscow.

Thermite! Yeeeehaww!

it was actually shot by those ukrainians playing with howitzers in a residential area.

It lacks jet fuel user

An autistic Serb is spamming this shit across several threads.
Any truth to this? Or a shill
>"Ukraine hit their own buildings"

>hohols are attacking their own civilians
>twitter.com/200_zoka/status/1497481389876338688
>twitter.com/200_zoka/status/1497486881193349121
>twitter.com/200_zoka/status/1497484518323802114

Still OP has a point. Why didn't it get flattened into its own floor profile.

It's not a soviet block either. 10 y.o. at latest

2015, this building is still displaying ads from the developer.
I guess this is also why there were no casualties, perhaps it's still not fully occupied

Attached: Screenshot 2022-02-26 at 17.40.46 copy.jpg (4000x2500, 2.11M)

No, but the energy contained in their fuel tanks is pretty crazy.

An US MOAB has 8500kg of explosives, power of 11 tons of TNT or 46 GJ. An A320 can have 23430L of fuel, for Jet-A1 at 34.7 MJ/L (9.6 kWh/L) that's 813 GJ.

If that went up at the same speed, you can imagine how bad that would be. But even a slower release... buildings just aren't really quite built for that and how much exactly is deposited inside vs goes outside and all that will be an issue.

On high rise buildings, once the metal reinforcement in the concrete becomes softer somewhere, there may easily be a collapse. Even before it melts. Stresses are very high.

Yeah that was kind of the point.

>small boom boom from Ukrainian air defence
>minor damage, building doesn't fall
>as is the case

>big boom boom from a Russian cruise missile
>building would surely fall?

No?

Try smashing something half the width of a football field, that's 200 tons, loaded with jet fuel, and moving 400kph+ and tell me.

look at the size of a plane. Now imagine if the rocket that hit that building was had the same size as a plane.

9/11 was a day of miracles

Attached: 1631582471740.webm (1920x1080, 1.6M)

it's going to collapse in two more weeks, wait and see.

Russians claim it was a ukrainian buk missile. Since those are meant to take down airplanes, could perhaps explain the little damage