How is that capitalism under few strong empowered elites has never failed to prosper?
Industrial Europe, Meiji Japan, post war Korea, and now China.
Furthermore, all of them except China is not stagnating after adopting liberal democratic free market.
And all the promising developing nations in Africa and SEA have also adopted crony capitalism modelled after South Korea.
Crony capitalism
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
youtu.be
twitter.com
>crony
If you really cared about fixing the system you would call it by it's actually name
irony capitalism?
>How is that capitalism under few strong empowered elites has never failed to prosper
Because it's not actually capitalism.
It looks like socialism
Hmm, sweetie thats not real capitalism.
Real capitalism is when everything is beautiful and I have lot of money.
It's part pf the cycle of gay jewing, the retarded elites drown themselves on debt, loot the place and leave the shitted country for another group to deal with the resulting problems.
They are also the same subhumans behind other phases of this cycle (fake democracy, the outrage and redneck phase, the authoritarian phase, ...) so every decision is aimed at accumulating gibsmedats for their mafia, more power and control, and the typical effeminate nigger goals of psychopaths.
> Meiji Japan
They had an elite of Chud monarchs, freemasons and other suspicious people shoved there bty the USA, after the WW2 (the last of many pointless jew vs jew wars Japan participated in) they had to stage a soft version of a commie revolution to stop their effeminate elites from ruining the country forever.
What's the real name? You're not suggesting government intervention means capitalism, right? You're not that stupid, right?
No that’s just capitalism. The very function of the state under a capitalist mode if production is to protect the profits of the ruling elite. Non-crony capitalism doesn’t exist, it has never existed, and it will never exist.
fixd
Capitalism is just a marxist slur used to describe all systems that don't fit their ideal. It only started being used by US boomercons unironically when US conservatism was inflitrated by trotskyists and became "neoconservatism".
en.wikipedia.org
>Some, including Kristol, Hook, and Podhoretz, later became key figures in the development of Neoconservatism.
en.wikipedia.org
>the "godfather of neoconservatism"
>The very function of the state under a capitalist mode if production
Marxist language is a anthropocentric meme.
What is the "mode of production" in a badger?
The mode of production isn’t marxist terminology lmao. The mode of production is owned the economy is owned and organized. Under capitalism, the means of production are privately owned and the economy is profit-driven.
>The mode of production is owned
The mode of production is how**
Jfc
Australia saves the thread.
Pol in debt with aussieposters one more time
What do you mean by "adopting crony capitalism"?
Crony capitalism is very interesting to me but honestly I don't see what your point is so I can't really discuss it. Anyway here's a good video if you haven't seen it:
youtu.be
>1 post by this ID
>over 1 hour ago
faggot
>The mode of production isn’t marxist terminology lmao.
It is.
It's part of his historical materialism.
It was always capitalism
Theres no capitalism without state and bank bruh
>NOT REAL CAPITALISM GUISEEE XDDD
oh the fucking irony