Why do Indians dominate?

Why do Indians dominate?
twitter.com/dcexaminer/status/1496294572200275973?s=20&t=V5UbeyZthPJ5SnsFVnoKvQ

Attached: 3243189D-76D0-45E4-A2FB-5C0F42E3AD32.jpg (1262x1340, 833.99K)

Other urls found in this thread:

chess.com/article/view/countries-with-the-most-chess-grandmasters
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Wow you’re right. I really wish I was a poo now

Chess is literally a game for computers.

Sri Lankans?

What's the percentage of white people that are great chess players vs Indians that are? There's a lot more Indians in the world

GOOD MORNING

Attached: 99C73F29-8A22-44CB-BB01-48E053C93383.jpg (1200x1200, 265.26K)

chess.com/article/view/countries-with-the-most-chess-grandmasters

We actually suck in chess. We shouldn't be seeing any white person in chess since we invented the game

>people who invented mathematics are smart

Because there is a billion of them and they live in a society that lets them think unlike the billion Chinese.

It’s just a numbers game bro

So long as pajeets don't shit in our streets and continue to discriminate against niggers, I can tolerate them.

is chess a game where the better player wins 100% of the time or are flukes possible?

>is chess a game where the better player wins 100% of the time
No, people blunder all the time. One bad move or oversight and you can lose to a substantially worse player.

Yeah, even good players make blunders occasionally. It gets increasingly rare at higher levels though but it's really more of an inevitability if you're a professional and playing hundreds of serious games (and thousands of unrated games) per year. That being said the game is also very "trappy", in the sense that players will study opponent's games and look for flaws in their opening repertoire/prepare lines against each-other.

But can they poo in loo?

then it would be interesting to see a first to 5 or 10 between the two.

I'd be proud of him. Let's not hate such an achievement

Yeah, I guess it's worth mentioning despite blunders happening less at a higher level, they're capitalized on a lot more. A blunder against a weak opponent is a lot less devastating than a blunder against a strong player. Some players are known especially for their ability to ferociously take advantage of mistakes.

>7 H1Bs living in an efficiency apartment
>Household income

Attached: 1645540876022.png (1042x1137, 89.17K)

>Why do Indians dominate?
GOOD MORNING SIRS

Attached: 4423297F-E1EC-438A-AB61-194F9E8D2797.jpg (576x1024, 93.58K)

He's been losing to retards lately so yeah that's that. The poo just has been lucky to be at the right time at the right place
>Magnus Carlsen Blunders and He Lost to Ian Nepomniachtchi in 2022
youtube.com/watch?v=B-DrBKA0VOY

Attached: 1643791018781m.jpg (1024x672, 60.38K)

Surprisingly, it probably wouldn't. Chess at this level is almost entirely dominated by draws. For example: of the 15 matches played for the 2018 world championship title, only 3 of them were decisive. The game is so ridiculously dominated by computers, and computer aided training that it's really taken a lot of the magic out of the game. Many games from the romantic era to the hypermodern era are beautiful pieces of art practically. The "computer era" as it's been called is pretty soulless comparatively.

Attached: maples.webm (768x432, 2.39M)