When is the last time the USA actually won a war vs an equal or greater force?

Against Britain during the Revolutionary War? What on Earth makes people believe they stand a chance against Russia and China with a bunch of Asian, East European, African and South American countries thrown into the mix? NATO? The entire Western world would get rolled in WW3 let's not kid ourselves. They'd have to fight too many people across too much landmass, it would be a logistical nightmare from the word go. Your latest and greatest aircraft carrier can barely lift your jets and your newest fighter is an over-engineered underperforming showpiece so don't talk about muh tech and muh navy and air superiority as if it makes up for your shit troops and pathetic logistics. USA and its NATO lapdogs don't have what it takes I promise you. What's the last war you won against and equal or superior force? In modern times not oje single time. Not once. Good luck mutts.

Attached: images.jpg (640x480, 52.42K)

Other urls found in this thread:

webm.red/oee9.webm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Khasham
ndtv.com/world-news/china-space-mission-china-space-china-tested-new-space-capability-with-hypersonic-missile-report-2578051
youtube.com/watch?v=Kfe6d6MzeLM
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

flag checks out, only a nigger could be this retarded

Flag checks out. Only a Rhodesian could be this smart

Attached: 8353883.jpg (634x461, 105.66K)

Answer the question huemonkey. I'm genuinely curious.

The last time the US fought a conventional war, they absolutely raped Iraq that at the time it was the 3rd best military in the world.

Attached: 1638639731890.png (1024x652, 598K)

webm.red/oee9.webm

You think Iraq is an equal or greater force than the US military? Come on now.

No because no one can come close to the US.
In conventional military conflict fought between conventional armies, NATO literally does not have an equal, and if it ever finds itself in a open conflict with Russia it would be extremely one-sided.

Attached: 1628630491785.jpg (792x764, 264.43K)

>No because no one can come close to the US
russia has more tanks, better rockets and more nukes. China has bigger fleet and better rockets. wtf are you talking about?

When was the last time there was a power of equal or greater than the US?

1991

>russia has more tanks
World War 2 era tanks, literally started shitting their pants when Ukraine were getting free Javelins from the west
>better rockets
No they don't, they have a worse economy than Brazil even
>more nukes
More than half of russian nukes are deactivated, America has more nukes
>China has bigger fleet
Literally irrelevant, even more in this day and age of drones and air superiority.
>and better rockets
No, they don't.

Attached: 1615077584353.png (389x162, 14.15K)

Today. A coalition of China and Russia would already be well clear.

you literally don't understand shit about what you're talking about, i forgot how much of a shithole Any Forums is i'm going back to /k/

Attached: 1637964298977.gif (300x252, 2.79M)

Russia fought the US in Syria and got destroyed. China would fair worse.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Khasham

WW2. And we won't win against any near peer as we are now.

You're making on paper arguments to real world warfare logistics and thinking that's a sound position to hold. You're just coming from a place of fear. Which is odd because Brazil and other South American countries would likely end up on the China side of the line when push comes to shove.

Did you really expect OP to not be a retarded shill spamming memes? Ofc russia is vastly outmatched by the US and almost all of Europe. Russia is a third world shithole. Not some equal superpower against all of that.

Attached: 1642110321891.jpg (640x464, 48.61K)

You areva fucking idiot. TheUS destroyed anything and everything there was a political will to go. Including destroying a bunch of ruskies. People like you are fucking retarded faggots.

Pro tip you did not want to be a Syrian sand nigger spraying your AK in the air as precision guided bombs wrecked your ass.

>You're making on paper arguments to real world warfare logistics
Said the faggot talking about how Russia will win because it has more tanks and China has a bigger fleet
>Which is odd because Brazil and other South American countries would likely end up on the China side of the line when push comes to shove
Brazil under Bolsonaro would never side with China and we'll probably be neutral if Putin ever stops being a pussy
>Did you really expect OP to not be a retarded shill spamming memes?
No

Attached: 1623923346156.png (3922x2107, 3.37M)

Established force vs literal nothings lmao.

Attached: IMG_20220223_001617.jpg (720x1051, 92.04K)

Drop the VPN Ivan. Your English sucks.

Misread what this guy wrote. He is correct. But Russia is not near peer. The Brits would be or maybe France had they the resources and numbers.

I'm not the one who said that. Thought you were gonna leave? What are you afraid of?

>Russian trained
>Russian equipped
>Russian tactics
Exactly. Russia still thinks they can zerg rush like it's WW2.

Civil War. Can't lose when you fight yourself!

>World War 2 era tanks
T-72s and T-80 are considered more than capable. They are not ww2 era tanks.
>started shitting their pants when Ukraine were getting free Javelins from the west
Russia doesn't care about Javelins. They care about the strategic significance of Ukraine. If Ukraine joins NATO, then NATO forces can easily cut-off Russia's oil reserve by attacking Volgograd.
>No they don't, they have a worse economy than Brazil even
s400 are better than patriots. that's a fact.
>More than half of russian nukes are deactivated, America has more nukes
Russia has 6,255 nuclear warheads. USA has 5,550
>Literally irrelevant
lol you are dumb
>No, they don't.
Yes, they do. China has low-orbit bombs and it scare the hell out of USA 4 months ago.

ndtv.com/world-news/china-space-mission-china-space-china-tested-new-space-capability-with-hypersonic-missile-report-2578051

Stop getting your information from memes.

LoL you are a fucking moron. Why would a Russian brag about US forces not losing in Syria and wrecking Russuan forces?

Damn you are a dumb tool. Too fucking stupid to know you can just change the flag. You don't need a VPN.

Comparing a small detachment of Russian trained and equipped nothings to a full wartime force as an argument against "equal or superior". Come on man. That's just weak. Rather talk about Vietnam or Korea or something. Not that they were equal either but at least there's an argument.

>You don't need a VPN.
Thanks for outing yourself Ivan. Hope to see a video of you getting killed in Ukraine.

Their conventional forces would get rocked. The nukes however are problematic.

>T-72s and T-80 are considered more than capable
lmao
>rest of the post is literal chinese and russian propaganda
I hope a war breaks so America can BTFO every eastern shithole and you shills can finally shut the fuck up forever

Attached: 1625778696476.jpg (532x1150, 187.72K)

Hey just continue to suck dick like you already are faggot. Not like we can't all see what you are up to.

And also why the fuck are you mutts acting like your entire country isn't getting looted and burnt down by niggers the same week a war starts. Your country has never been as destabilised as it is now. Wouldn't be surprised if you had the nigger purge on the one side and civil war on the other.

Never, even in the US independence war, they were fighting alongside the French who had far greater military power than the UK.

As people say around here, give Americans x10 material advantages and they'll win half of the time. That's as far as they go.

Doesn't matter. It's exaggerated for starters and it's hardly an issue for the armed forces now. Later on it will be. But not yet.

youtube.com/watch?v=Kfe6d6MzeLM
seethe. you live in a dreamworld and you might wake up suddenly

Define win

it's over russia won because of a internet ad
>this is the mentality of shills on nu/pol/

They could bully the inferior Japanese forces in WW2 but the Germans thought they were a circus for most of the war too.

T-80 are as good as tanks get, modernized T-80s are considerable better than modernized Abrahams. T-72 are trash.

>Define win
If you need to play with the definition of victory of a certain war, it's most probably a defeat.

I'm not gay but fuck men kissing is hot

Attached: offset_1078195[1].jpg (650x433, 101.15K)

>T-80 are as good as tanks get
Just as good isn't it shitskin
You niggers are literally braindead lmao

If Americans could fight the Germans as well as the Soviets did, it'd be the US army facing fewer German troops, not USSR facing most of the Wehrmacht, who'd have captured Berlin.

In what regard are modernized T-80s inferior to modernized Abrahams or any other modern tank?

russia will win because it is impossible for the usa to fight russia and china at the same time. The ad is only an indication. Official videos show the priorities of the US army. They also show the state of the modern american society. America is fucked. Their cities are burning by niggers, just like in Brazil. Homosexuals and transgenders are policing speech lol

And the the germans always lost against the US in ww2.

>When is the last time the USA actually won a war vs an equal or greater force?

Normandy, France against the Germans.

The Pacific against the Japanese.

Korea, against the Chinese.

>The ad is only an indication.
The absolute state of zoomer retards.

1812

Germans lost against USSR and a few other countries giving it some help... even in the pacific theater, it was China, not the US, who did most of the fighting.

Nah, you just a faggot. You queer.

Attached: 1595901098260.jpg (762x785, 192.83K)