i never heard of this act. is this one of the many attempts to regulate the internet? it was just thrown out of nowhere
I never heard of this act. is this one of the many attempts to regulate the internet? it was just thrown out of nowhere
Other urls found in this thread:
did you follow the link you posted?
Yes
Nobody will stop me from masturbating to femboys and furries
More info: nordvpn.com
Good, fuck you degenerate pieces of shit...frankendick/axewound infections and AIDS all around!
>a lot of NSFW and lgbtbbqpedoabc+ content might vanish from the internet
Sounds pretty great so far!
Imagine complying with the law.
there would never be a ban on LGBT fag shit, that is part of globohomos propaganda regiment lol
you are literally asking to get us killed on sight you fucking hypocrite, hope you enjoy not having a fag like me willing to suck your tiny white dick at a gas station because your wife is fucking tyrone instead of you!
Kek hilarious bait
>you are literally asking to get us killed on sight you fucking hypocrite
I fucking wish this was on the table. That'll be the fucking day. Sodomy is mutual masturbation. You can't produce a child. Your life is literally based on masturbation. lmaoing at your 'culture'
>wife cheats on me
>"I'm going to go get my dick sucked by a fag at the gas station."
What the fuck is wrong with you people? Literally nobody would do that ever.
>you are literally asking to get us killed on sight
Yes.
they will take your dick out of your cold, dead hands
>dick out of your cold, dead hands
That's commonly referred to as a "stranger".
they're not going to censor THEM you idiot they're going to censor US
reminder to everyone, this jew is trying to have you the right leaning Any Forums user pro section 230 repeal, just like the conservatives who want to restrict its scope in name of controlling big tech.
Reminder that Any Forums and kiwifarms will cease to exist without it.
Holy hell user, I laughed so hard i had a coughing fit.
What a fucking retarded take, wholly unsurprising given that faggots are utterly incapable of comprehending reality outside of the scope of their sexual deviance. The real problem with the EARN IT act is, like nearly any piece of legislation that has ever been passed "to protect the children", it is yet another expansion of power for government entities to dictate to companies.
>Facebook, Twitter, Reddit and so-on are cancer though, and absolutely should be controlled in some way
I don't disagree in the slightest. Social media companies hide behind 230 to skirt the fact that they have an inordinate amount of control over public perception and opinion through the selective procurement of content. The real solution to the problem isn't making them accountable for user content, but defining the legal difference between a public platform and a content curator. This arms people with the ability to hold FAGMAN accountable for their obvious agendas and blatant manipulation of the political system for their own gains while not appreciably increasing the power of the government or destroying public platforms as a whole.
Nobody will see or read this though, and NPCs will decide the bill is good because it -somehow- hurts gay people or because "why wouldn't I want to protect children? I'm not a nazi!"
> It aims to amend Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934, which allows operators of websites to remove user-posted content that they deem inappropriate, and provides them with immunity from civil lawsuits related to such posting.
Can't websites already do this in the first place? Not sure why trannies are seething over this.
If they take away my anime girls I will personally lead the revolution
>cartoon female avatar
confirmed tranny