STOP CRITICIZING THE NEW YORK TIMES YOU CONSPIRACY THEORIST

STOP CRITICIZING THE NEW YORK TIMES YOU CONSPIRACY THEORIST

Attached: 7AA62407-EF4E-4BC0-BA6E-8307F85B0DE9.jpg (640x787, 252.53K)

Other urls found in this thread:

skribbl.io/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

i wouldn't read the new york times if it was full of naked nigger chicks and my dog was shitting on it.

These people talk about psychology like it's a hard science. They don't know that psychology is about as "hard" of a science as feng shui or rap battles.

>Shallenberger

Attached: 1643916088710.gif (200x150, 2.11M)

I REFUSE to play that shit game.

Make me.

try this bad boi
skribbl.io/

>Shallenberger
If this Joomer doesn't know the New York Times has been a shitlib propaganda outlet for nearly a century, that explains his ignorant worldview.
If he doesn't know that a top-down ideologically-enforced organization like the times cannot, by definition be a conspiracy, please inform him.

NYT is run by the CIA. They are pure evil.

ok what the fuck is wordle

i used to think like you.
unfortunately, i was wrong.
psychology is the study of human behavior and works on distributions of people.
it's a surprisingly effective tool, because most people dismiss it and because most people behave similarly.
for example if you read the sentence
>you are now breathing manually
your brain will transition control of your respiration from the ANS to the CNS.
this means that, over the internet and without your permission, i used words to elicit a predictable psysiological response in you.
obama was right: words have power.
the study of human behavior can tell us which words elicit which behaviors most often, and then we can use the media to parrot those words to elicit an average societal behavoiral response.

a kids game like hangman

I've read that sentence so many times I don't even register a change in breathing. I dismiss your claims with absolute certainty. I abhor liars.

You know that we have brain scanners now, right? we can prove that linguistic tricks provide no changes to the underlying cognition. We can also prove that Han chinese do not consider other races to be worthy of empathy.

its a basic boogle type game ie randomized letters are generated and you have to spell as many words as you can with whatever you got, it became an overnight sensation because it lets you flex your vocabulary skill on other plebs, however it became so popular the NYT decided to buy it to remain relevant and now they're removing "obscure and obscene" words and fucking with the point system in order to make it more accessible to niggers and the like

You have 6 guesses to figure out the 5 letter word of the day basically. Wrong letters turn gray, misplaced letters turn yellow, and correctly placed words turn green. Its just a good way to get the brain started in the morning. It was free, something fun to play with friends and family. and then the jewyork times came in and bought it for like 1 ot 2 million, so good for the creator, but they are messing it up. You didnt need to log in to play it, and thats going to happen soon, and soon after that, they are going to make people pay for it.

>I dismiss your claims with absolute certainty. I abhor liars.
>no, i didn't bother to read the part where you said 'distributions of people'
you are now blinking manually.

>You know that we have brain scanners now, right? we can prove that linguistic tricks provide no changes to the underlying cognition. We can also prove that Han chinese do not consider other races to be worthy of empathy.
i think, that if you knew who you were talking to right now (what i do for a living) you would have a good chuckle.
unfortunately, that'll never happen.

There's lots of cocksuckers here, you're not unique.

>it only works if you aren't paying attention
Why do people always seem to think this means it's Science! tm

Pathetic

>NYT buys wordle
>NYT makes changes to wordle
>Those changes make the game worse
>Ergo the NYT ruined wordle
How in Christ's name is this "confirmation bias" rather than a chain of causation simple enough for a toddler to understand?

Attached: wordle.gif (333x61, 1.23K)

>you're not unique
never said i was
only that the irony was so thick, due to factors such as the context of the conversation and to whom what was being asserted, that it had crossed the line into humor.

Jesus, you type like a fucking retard.
Do you have over 200 confirmed kills too?

I am chuckling faggot

>Pathetic
>i discount what you are saying out of hand due to the relatively low magnitude of your demonstration
i merely assert that unwanted behaviors can be induced in the unwilling using nothing but words.
the minor demonstrations that i have provided are sufficient to back up my claim.

Attached: Sneedle.png (590x665, 19.4K)

What changes have they made to date?

Attached: file.png (338x207, 8.17K)

Seems like baby ended up in a psychology course

>you type bad
Brah

>mjshally
even his friends call him by his last name lol
thats the most you get out of me out of a non blue checkmark twitter faggot thread

What's the backstory on this? Was Wordle owned by someone else first and how did Jew York Times ruin it?

God damn it you pretentious faggots are insufferable.
You are not talking about psychology.
You are talking about neurology.
The best psychology can come up with is neurological solutions.
>give them drugs and then condition them
Understand the difference between the machinations of a conditioned drugged brain and a sober brain.
Understand that the psychological pseudo science only works when you remove the human element from people and make them less conscious.
This is why it is not a hard science because you faggots never frame it as the above.
If you framed it as brain washing drugged up retards then people wouldn't fall for your shit anymore.

You can't type the word slave anymore

>Oh no! They ruined my candy crush!
You fags are so gay.

>Do you have over 200 confirmed kills too?
it's good that you are skeptical of what you read.
although you could probably exercise a little more discrimination with regard to where you direct your anger; i'm certainly not a bad guy.