The cold winters theory, race and whatever are hilarious. It's not about their specific arguments...

The cold winters theory, race and whatever are hilarious. It's not about their specific arguments, it's that from their entire goals and assumptions are wrong.
Being able to apply technology and build civilization are a low form of intelligence. You could train a bird to build a jet engine, in fact industrial robots that do that are at a bird level of intelligence. It takes very little intelligence to merely operate existing infrastructure and produce goods.
The next argument is about design, and invention. But design is essentially random, you can design anything through trial and error and it's not a sign of intelligence. There are eight year old children who design airplanes and equipment. Using the age adjusted iq that libs use, you need an iq of 40 or 50 to design even high technology. Another argument is iq is impulse control, but that's irrelevant and plenty of scientists were total morons and borderline murderous.
It doesn't take any intelligence to follow directions, to use trial and error, and create civilization. The "supply side" of intelligence isn't constrained in any meaningful way. At some point intelligence is just ability to answer trivia questions and do party tricks, and that point is reached fast as nothing in the real world is difficult. Any complex task becomes meaningless.
What really matters is the entire assumption and goal behind behavior, not the difficulty of performing the behavior. Smart people kill themselves, survival is a negative value and a sign of low intelligence. The fact Any Forums sees otherwise is proof this forum is one of npcs- in fact that's the exact definition of npc, you are stuck at the iq 40 or 50 point where being able to design or use technology is even a problem, as opposed to the goal of using it.

Attached: 5A5F5D50-8685-442F-8CC1-69B5EA3A34A0.jpg (1280x720, 132.17K)

It's this belief that existence, survival, technology and progress are a positive value that is a sign of intelligence, and not pointless, is what defines NPCs. Npcs themselves are too stupid to understand anything in this post anyway and will give some one line greentext reply.
Another level of misunderstanding is that intelligence is a sign of civilization. In reality civilization is R strategy, it's low quality, low intelligence behavior. Being more successful at civilization and external things that don't benefit your own physical strength and health is a waste of time. It is only to create a synthetic environment for more low quality offspring

A last, final misunderstanding is that civilization *is* the K strategy, or that civilized people are healthier, stronger or whatever and militarily defeat the uncivilized. As if, say something like the defeat of the native Americans by libs is proof that libs are better.
In reality that is wrong and gets into tedious details. Natives were already civilized. The eastern native Americans were farmers, were living at a high population density and simply didn't have iron. The western native Americans are still there and never left. They became redefined and moved into other groups. It's just that europe had overwhelming numbers and resources and won, the fact they were civilized is incidental, even if Europeans came over with crude iron clubs and rafts they would still win.
Then the belief that life span and life expectancy are the same- like how the Ww2 cohort had high expectancy and low span- is another belief. And then life expectancy itself being a marker of health is another. As if the old, decrepit people today are comparable to hunter gatherers. Modern societies have a hundred times more people, but removing all the old fat people who aren't physically fit, the real population has barely changed. Bone can easily be stronger than steel, none of the weapons libs used are especially lethal.

There will never be a chance to test this out, as apes are overpopulated, all the situations where civilized met hunter gatherers were very late in history and they were already R strategists and malnourished. But a real hunter gatherer, with a 3g/cm3 bone density would easily stop bullets and kill any liberal. The apes and the things that came before humans would be invincible at that density, a nuclear bomb airburst a thousand feet away is a petajoule, or 30 gigajoules pee square meter. A punch from a primordial ape, weighing a ton and traveling at 30 meters per second is a mega joule, or maybe ten per cubic meter. Being punched a hundred times by a ape is more force than a nuclear explosion.
It can be seen here that in no way is civilization a reflection of intelligence. Civilization itself is a R strategy, needed for the survival of low quality offspring. In terms of survival or military strength, civilizations are only accidentally powerful, because if the things nature creates happen to be defective or not yet evolved then weapons appear stronger. In reality civilization will collapse from resource depletion and its own stupidity, and any argument for, or relying on the supposed of intelligence of civilization is in fact a defense of the npcs which constitute it.
Now give your retarded reply, or none at all.

Tl;dr the ability to build civilization is a sign of low intelligence.

Birds are robots you dolt try keeping up so you don’t make a fool of yourself again.

Well done jidf

Digits don’t lie especially trips, fuck these little niggers caught me

civilisation isn't a goal which people aim for, it's a by product of a highly civilised, intelligent, adaptive, group-orientated people being exposed to centralisation.

the reason modern civilisation develops is from the populations in the north sea area, who were highly resilient, tough, adaptive, group-orientated people who survived very cold and seasonal environments, being exposed to centralisation.

So, a low iq outcome supposedly arose from high iq behavior.
Also cold winters is fake and Africa has more temperature variance.

Attached: 5A992D86-59DC-4594-BB61-F1C11B3186FE.jpg (750x555, 262.78K)

>a low iq outcome supposedly arose from high iq behavior.
what? in the development of civilisation it selects for intelligence
>Also cold winters is fake
cold winters..... is..... fake.
>temperature variance.
not cold