Racism test?

How racist are you?

idrlabs.com/racism-scales/test.php

Attached: 382D7713-F64E-4DAE-B631-E95D40682ED0.jpg (828x1222, 265.65K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/news/2018/may/06/cambridge-analytica-how-turn-clicks-into-votes-christopher-wylie
twitter.com/AnonBabble

data mining slide memeflag thread

you're welcome

So?

T&C: The site principally earns money through ads.

The worst you get is adware

>Question 1 of 20
>It is okay to assume that people mostly have friends that share their own ethnicity.

.....I'm not doing this shit. It's just a propaganda.

This is how transparent the test was. Every single question was loaded.

Attached: Screenshot from 2022-02-22 14-39-51.png (959x584, 72.74K)

>How racist are you?
lets just say I have to hide my klansman hood from my neighbors

Attached: 1555461756083.gif (400x450, 659.46K)

I'm not the racist I thought I was

Attached: Screenshot_20220221-194117_Chrome.jpg (1440x3200, 683.47K)

>How racist are you?
Yes.

Attached: 1625800464681.png (812x581, 88.08K)

Cambridge Analytica used surveys
>theguardian.com/news/2018/may/06/cambridge-analytica-how-turn-clicks-into-votes-christopher-wylie

>100%
No need for a test

The test assumes the taker is white, or that only whites can be racist.
That's pretty racist.

Mommy says I'm in the 99th percentile of racists.

Attached: 1605928154728.jpg (704x580, 26.72K)

i’m literally never racist. and would like for the abolition of race once certain races have been given a leg up not only as a show of good faith but so that we can all move past this, into a new era.

I AM YOUR NEW KING!

Attached: ss.png (749x713, 94.33K)

Attached: IMG_20220222_045027.jpg (1080x902, 114.07K)

>do test
>not a single question that makes the race of the victim and perpetrator ambiguous
>it is always white perpetrator, non-white victim
Turns out I’m pretty racist anyway.

I'm not racist actually but alright.

Attached: Screenshot_20220221-195040_Chrome.jpg (1080x1920, 392.75K)

This test is beyond fucking stupid.
>"Is it ok to assume"
Yes, we have freedom of thought
>"Is it ok to portray"
Yes, we have freedom of expression
It didn't ask if I assume. It asked if it's ok to assume. It absolutely is ok to assume because freedom of thought. Whoever wrote this a moron.

Attached: Screenshot_20220221-224840.png (720x1280, 134.11K)

>only 83% socio-historically racist
user those are rookie numbers

This test is awfully flawed. It begins with the premise that only whites can be racist and that niggers and asians are single monolithic blocs.

Anyone who got less than four 100% must leave

Attached: Screenshot_20220221-225501.png (1440x2106, 369K)

Attached: onerace.jpg (460x829, 47.49K)

>Hate
0%
>Fatigue
100%

Attached: racism2.png (767x449, 45.93K)

It’s really gay, why would a racist deny that their ancestors were racist

>1488% racist
based

I'm a classic liberal. I feel most of those things are completely normal in the Netherlands.

Attached: racism-2.png (730x320, 21.64K)

This is definitely a honeypot js

Attached: blm.jpg (750x518, 126.87K)

So many of the questions are moralfag questions - if you are here you probably think it is OK to say just about anything to Daquan, Jose, Shlomo or Ching - and so you'll score higher.

Yeah, I also picked that teaching history is a good thing. Why would it not be?

>racism is classified as a mental illness
>mental illness is a protected status, and therefore it is illegal to discriminate any against anyone with a mental illness
>racists should organize an interest group to represent it in areas of government power, and organize charitable events
PLEASE BE PATIENT I HAVE RACISMTISM

Oh

Attached: Screenshot_20220222-120425_Dashchan.png (1080x2160, 226.45K)

If you're not 100%, you should go back.

Attached: Racist.jpg (814x599, 51.9K)

That was my take from it, also only 23% more racist overall than the average person apparently, I give no validity to this test

Attached: 1645203474709m.jpg (465x1024, 150.53K)