Wars should be fought in VR...

Wars should be fought in VR. That way nobody dies and whoever wins gets to claim diplomatic advantage and everyone can move on

Attached: maxresdefault2.jpg (1280x720, 190.48K)

>in recent news the US is imposing sanctions on china after the braindrillâ„¢ patent war after a data breach revealed their soldiers had that janky ass hitboxes

You have to be 18 to post here

Everyone would be ok with this, until they lost. Then its real war time again.

/thread

>66â–¶
>Wars should be fought in VR. That way nobody dies and whoever wins gets to claim diplomatic advantage and everyone can move on
Removing the death and horror of war and its consequences would encourage nations to go to war constantly to get what they want.

Hax

Yeah, you fight the war in the game, while we bomb the shit out of you faggot. What a stupid idea. Can't even enjoy any game without modding pieces of shit.

And whst happens when 1 s
side does not agree to the results of your video game? Lol dumb fucjing kike

>Wars should be fought in VR.
>#1 ranked account in simulator mode air combat in War Thunder is called GREEK_AIR_FORCE

The whole point of war is population control.

you would be surprised user, but nations go to war despite death and horror, all the time in fact
some even go to war specifically for those reasons, dibs on resources are just a bonus

>awww ok, you won da game, alright, you may now control our country and dictate terms to us. We'll step aside and let you take control, now that you've beaten us in the video game.
I don't think you realize how wars work

You mean like the Olympics?

Challenging all Jannies to virtual war, if I win I get control of all of POL

>I don't think you realize how wars work
achsually, user, once, when Alexander the Great found himself surrounded on multiple sides when he was besieging a city and enemy armies started showing up on nearby hills, he got out of the trouble by doing formation marching drills with the phalanx in full view of the enemy until they decided they didn't want to fight his troops

highschool kid take, wars shouldn't happen but they do and while most of the time they are not just, sometimes they are (like the one we are in now) why should we have rolled over to WEF/UN/Bankers? They created how many wars in the past, selling supplies to both sides? This time we have to fight the real enemy and we are not going to lose. If we don't there will never be another opportunity, and it will be worse than eating bugs if we lose.

>That way nobody dies
>diplomatic advantage and everyone can move on
KEK you serious? How do you plan to enforce this diplomatic advantage? War always breaks out when diplomatic negotiations fail and the goal is to gain diplomatic advantage by force. You reach that by destroying the enemy's infrastructure and that, of course!, includes killing the people who fight for the enemy up to the point where their will is broken

But how will the elites reduce the populations? How will the MIC milk money out of governments?
War will always have killing because it benefits a lot of people.

You laugh now but in the future all wars will be fought in VR. All your shit complaints are from outdated world

They tried that in Star Trek. It didn't work.

When every country is using Korean Mercenaries to fight on their behalf.....what could go wrong

>let's pretend force is not the oldest and most effective compliance technique ever devised by man
>let's make it a game instead so nobody gets hurt
OP has an anus gaping wide enough to park a pair of cadillacs in sideways, and it's dripping with the cum of many, many homosexual lovers.

You are dumb as fuck.

if you can convince your enemy you're superior without actually destroying everything and murdering everyone its usually in your benefit