The last great war they lost at least 16 million soldiers.
Don't bring up Krivosheev bullshit. He is a Soviet propagandist, not a reliablie source
There is one very solid source to scrap the fraudulent data by Russian generals regarding the understating of military losses. It's Joseph Stalin's speech at a meeting with the creative intellectuals in 1946: "Over the first six months of the war more than 500,000 Communists perished on the fronts, more than three million during the war". Communists made up slightly more than 23 per cent of all servicemen. kprf.ru/party-live/regnews/154836.html
Memory books of Tatarstan (350 000 of the 700 000 drafted lost), Ryazan Oblast (174 920 out of 300 000 drafted have not returned), Omsk Oblast (144 000 out of 287 000), Chelyabinsk Oblast (158 000 out of 251 143), Kaluga Oblast (160 000 out of 300 000), Republic of Mordovia (130 960 out of 241 000), Novgorod Oblast ( 122 593 out of 192 908)... Shall I continue? wikiwand.com/en/Talk:World_War_II_casualties_of_the_Soviet_Union/Archive_1 Soviets lost 15-20 million soldiers fighting against 50-60% of Wehrmacht. Now Russians will have to fight the whole Europe without landlease. Are they suicidial? They have no chance. They would have lost to Germans fighting 1 on 1, now they think they can fight against the EU and the USA.
We must fight the Russians so we can finally achieve the Great Reset.
Adam Allen
>They would have lost to Germans fighting 1 on 1 Of course we have some problems with broomsticks, but the current state of the Bundeswehr is such that even Poland can kick them easily.
Jason Lopez
>The last great war they lost at least 16 million soldiers. Yeah and it was based as fuck. WW1 was the peak of humanity and it's been downhill ever since.
Easton Johnson
America had their chance after Cold War to strip Russia off of Nuclear Weapons. Now it is too late. With nukes Russia can fight the whole fucking World and still win.
Do you have any idea how much money and resources Russia has put into mobilizing troops and logistics? How much oil and fuel they have used up sending helicopters and tanks to the front lines? They have set up field hospitals with blood that will go bad if not used. No you didn’t know this, because you’re a retard. Invasion is a certainty at this point.
Alexander Bell
None. They got paid to do it by China you stupid fucking retard. Who got paid to do it by Brussels and the UK.
Oliver Murphy
1991, Russia is struggling to feed itself. USSR is collapsing. Bill Clinton wins elections, he has a chance to force Russia to dismantle its Nuclear arsenal and legally oblige them to not make any nukes, for that America would have given Russia money. But something fucky happened in the stupid mind of horny Bill Clinton and they didn’t push hard enough.
Xavier Morales
>it doesn’t matter because somebody else footed the bill Putting your obvious bullshit aside, my point still stands no matter who payed.
Alexander Carter
>Invasion is a certainty at this point. 2 more weeks
Benjamin Flores
How does your point stand if they aren't actually expending resources. Also, they have a pipeline, do you think they will run out of oil retard? Go read your post again you might be retarded.
Christopher Hill
>Also, they have a pipeline, do you think they will run out of oil retard? Please tell me you’re being ironic. If you are truly this retarded, I’m done arguing.
Lincoln Phillips
Z-z-z...
Chase Howard
You never made an argument in the first place. Let's recap >they will run out of supplies so they will attack soon >no they won't, the supplies are coming from elsewhere >well, they will run out of supplies >like what, they have many supplies aside from what they are given
Then you called me a retard. Is that an argument to you? Interesting... can you tell me about your mother?
Elijah Moore
>Donbass occupied by pro-Russian rebels since 2014 more like those Russians are already there even before Ukraine existed lmao they're natives
Jaxson Rivera
What is it? A humming of shortwave russian radar of anti aircraft systems? Tell me Ivan.
Juan Howard
Nice strawman argument. I never said they’d run out of supplies. I said they would never invest as much supplies as they have if they didn’t plan on invading. You have very poor reading comprehnsion.
Bentley Parker
>Do you have any idea how much money and resources Russia has put into mobilizing troops and logistics? >How much oil and fuel they have used up sending helicopters and tanks to the front lines? >Invasion is a certainty at this point.
Just quoting you, and yes, you never LITERALLY EXPLICITLY said the words "they are running out of supplies" but what the fuck else could you possibly mean you jackass? Write better.
F-
William Stewart
>they would never invest as much supplies as they have if they didn’t plan on invading. ASSUMING they are investing resources into that. That's a massive jackass assumption on your point and I have factual information which disproves it moreover, which I stated. How are you confused?
Josiah Sullivan
Germany spends on military more than Russia.
Juan Lee
All you stupid cunts don’t understand that $60 billion Russian Military budget is equivalent to $600 billion in USA defense spendings. Because Russia makes everything cheaper and doesn’t have wasteful fleets that protects World naval trade routes.
Colton Clark
Renting American troops is not military spending, it's stupidity. They only die for Zion.
Joseph Ross
>$60 billion Russian Military budget is equivalent to $600 billion
