Just see pic related, that's the philosophical metaphysical fondation of Atheism and it's pathetically absurd. > "What does need its origin explained is the concrete Universe itself, and as Hume ... long ago asked: why not stop at the material world ? It ... does perform a version of the ultimate bootstrapping trick; it creates itself ex nihilo ["from nothing" for nu/pol/]. Or at any rate out of something that is well-nigh indistinguishable from nothing at all." - Daniel Dennett (Philosopher and part of the 4 horsemen of New Atheism with Richard Dawkins),book: Breaking the Spell.
So what is he saying? First, they conform the Truth to his desires (instead of conforming his desires to the Truth as Truth seekers should) by endorsing the idea of "Why not stop at the material world". But then, he is saying that the universe created itself from NO-thing...or out of SOME-thing that is so small that it looks like NO-thing, therefore, it is NO-thing. LMAO. This whole big-bang thing has NO fondation whatsoever, it's just a massive scam and psy-ops to push atheism and destroy the morality of the nations making them easier to control.
And just see how Richard Dawkins (part of the same group than Daniel Dennett) humiliates himself for 6 minutes straight by constantly confusing Some-thing and No-thing, arguing that the Universe can come out of nothing LMAO. How can anyone past the age of 18 can still be an atheist endorsing the Big Bang "theory"?
Richard Dawkins Knows Nothing About Nothing? youtube.com/watch?v=v34QjYPuiEA Is Dawkins confused over claims that the universe can come "from nothing"? Material incorporated under Fair Use for critical, journalistic, educational and satirical purposes. The latter approach is encouraged by Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss themselves, who describe satire and ridicule as "legitimate" forms of argumentation, and affirm that "there's no-one whose views are not subject to question".
Science Cannot Explain History: Errors of Big Bang Cosmology youtube.com/watch?v=_ViDEZUbm3s > youtube.com/watch?v=_ViDEZUbm3s youtube.com/watch?v=_ViDEZUbm3s [ > youtube.com/watch?v=_ViDEZUbm3s Every form of evolutionary theory violates one of the first principles of philosophy, including (but not limited to): "red shift" theory, missing matter and energy, and the cosmological constant. Perhaps the largest problem is the false premise that there is no God, which leads to scientific explanation concluding that there is no God (error of circular reasoning). Because the origin of the universe is an historical question, science alone is unable to give a full account.
invented by a belgian priest. did i already mention that you modern christniggers are fucking retarded?
Tyler Peterson
Yes and? Doesn't make it right.
Christopher Garcia
The big bang theory doesn't explain what happened before the big bang
Daniel Torres
Yes and it doesn't explain what happened after the big bang neither. It explains nothing.
Lincoln Gutierrez
The big-bang cosmology : "Atoms formed and shit happened"...Wow, that's literally the fondation of this retarded theory.
Jayden Cruz
why is it wrong? bc some parasite-riddled american alcoholic found it wrong? it doesnt imply that there was "nothing" before it. that hume faggot cant even read straight
what a shit thread
Kevin Morales
>arguing that the Universe can come out of nothing LMAO So he argued the whole time for the existence of god. Because that's only logical conclusion. Even if he somehow took the god equation out of it, it's still magical thinking, which he chose rather than intelligent design. Basically a contrarian delusion.
Matthew Bennett
It explains the cosmic microwave background
Jaxon Scott
Those fags can't just say "I don't know". Probably the reason why the media shilled him, there are thousands and thousands of scientists like him, but his name had to be shown everywhere. Similar to that other fag Michio Kaku.
Noah Martinez
Stars are moving away from each other from a fixed point, big bang theory just takes that observation and works backwards as far as it can until newtonian physics breaks down. Everything after that isn't really bbt but speculation and other theories with quantum physics and all that shit. But even if it's entirely wrong, where to from there? What alternate theory do you propose? >god did it Okay well how did he do it >just did it great we can all just pack up shop and never think about it again. Thank you smol brain user
William Hughes
Fun fact: a Catholic priest came up with the Big Bang theory and the USSR banned it from schools for being "theistic science".
Jacob Edwards
Still betta than jew worship nigger foot prepping.
Lucas Smith
Holy shit can't you fucking retards read anything? He says ex nihilo OR something. Guess what I put in the options OP
Julian Bell
There is no foundation to atheism because atheism is not a philosophy or belief system, it is a lack of a religious belief. >Hume said materialists assume the universe was created ex nihilo It wasn't. The big bang theory postulates a singularity, not nothingness. The Big Bang theory has a considerable amount of observation and math backing it up. Redshift would make no sense without an expanding universe
Noah Wood
the big bang theory was developed by a catholic priest, retard. it says nothing about the state before or what it caused it, only that at some point about 13 billion years ago, the universe was compressed into a point and then rapidly expanded
Easton Taylor
This is why you don't read English men for metaphysics or ontology. Read Heidegger for that.
Alexander Rivera
"What happened before the big bang?" is a nonsensical question. Time as we understand it was formed by the big bang.
Hunter Adams
Why is this christcuck seething exactly? I don't get it.
Logan Mitchell
I don't believe it's nonsensical though. Time as we understand it must be somehow related to time as we don't understand it.
Ryan Bennett
The point is that there is no "before" the big bang any more than there is space "outside" the universe
Carson Walker
>time didnt exist until space existed because they are relative
So what was the big bang exploding and expanding into?
Lincoln Powell
>This whole big-bang thing has NO fondation whatsoever apart from it does, they didn't start with a random concept & make up a story to explain it, they started by looking at the evidence and seeing where it led, if the universe can be seen to be expanding you can extrapolate form that what happened in the past
Jackson Wright
thank you user thank you for posting this it won't go through their vacuous brains in the slightest, but it's a good statement that they, like many irrational people, only work from a negative framework of ignorance, rather than a positive dynamic of honest intellectual research it's never highlighted enough, but here is the perfect case
Alexander Phillips
This is the basis of Kabbalah I’m pretty sure, from nothing God created everything. I hope I’m not speaking from ignorance here, I just never understood how the Big Bang theory disproved the existence of God or any creationism. Wouldn’t the Big Bang of been a mechanism of God creating?
