Atheism

Find a flaw in my reasoning Any Forums

I am an atheist. I see no proof for the existence of god therefore I do not believe in god.

And in regards to Pascal's wager I believe in the case I am wrong an omnipotent and omniscient being capable of building entire universes would understand why I don't believe and would only judge my actions.

There would be no reason to punish me with eternal hellfire outside of pettiness like a scorned bitch so why should I "repent" and "accept God into my life"?

Attached: 1297836486170.jpg (600x595, 31.87K)

Whatever created the universe broke the Law of Conservation of Mass and therefore broke the laws of physics itself.

“Everything exploded into existence”

ok

Do you have an argument?

>I am an atheist. I see no proof for the existence of god therefore I do not believe in god.

no, as an atheist you believe that god doesnt exist.
subtle difference.

rationnal approach would actually be: "i dont know if god exists".
because you have no proof for the lack of his existance either.

I see no proof there is a man trapped inside of my tv who switches the channels on my tv every time I push buttons on my remote.

i don't believe he exists and i don't need to disprove the existence of such a person.

This is a flimsy argument.

a theist
Doesn't believe in God.
Sure thing, retard.

...
you didnt attack my argument per se
you attacked your process of examining whether god exists or not.

who are you trying to convince?
...bc not me...

I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.

My OP laid the terms out pretty clear.

Wow what a solid argument against my reasoning.

Guess I'll pick up a bible because some moron on a Scandinavian Acupuncture forum called me a retard.

>find a flaw in my logic
here it is
>aaah who cares anyways

youre a retard piece of shit, user

Alright so you are just upset because you couldn't find a flaw in my reasoning. Got it.

Name calling is not going to convince me of anything.

Well, you see user, this book written by a bunch of jews tells us that a jewish messiah wants us to worship and serve a jewish god. This is somehow proof that the jew god is real and we need to listen to what all those jews told us to do or he might get angry at us.

I never considered this perspective before.

I am now saved and have a strange desire to give a portion of every paycheque I earn to the state of Israel.

Good. I hope you will also consider shilling this religion in every single thread on Any Forums you enter. It's what the jew god wants after all.

>There would be no reason to punish me with eternal hellfire outside of pettiness like a scorned bitch so why should I "repent" and "accept God into my life"?

It’s not you will be punished because “would understand why I don’t believe” but your arrogance and hubris. He doesn’t need a “reason” he can do whatever the fuck he wants just like you think you can do whatever you want, that sounds fair right? Why would he be held up against standards if you won’t acknowledge the standards themselves?

I think you are massive faggot who is waisting everybody's time. Why come here to “get proven wrong” and force us to spoonfeed you because you are too retarded to use the fucking search engine you used to come here? It could have answered “your question” just aswell, even reddit could do this for a faggot like you. You didn’t come here to learn, you have already made up your mind yet you are trying to sow division and doubt. A thread died for this, because your retard atheist ego had to be stroked, kill yourself and find out if it’s real pussy.

This just sounds like extreme cope.

Present an argument like an adult instead of name calling and accepting defeat.

I don't think agnostics should be inclined to give credence to some war diety worshiped by ancient Judean goat fuckers over other dieties around the world. The only reason Christianity's god is always brought up is the historical dominance of Rome over Europe, propagating into western society today.

Repent, glowfriend.

Hi fren. What if science has already proven there's a Higher power and you and all other midwit atheists are holding back society?
Let's just use the best science theories available for the creation of the universe and particle movement and assume they're true. Let's assume the Big Bang an infinitely dense particle explodes outward creating the universe is true. Now let's apply how particles movement is changed when there's an observer. Essentially it's Schrodinger's cat. When there's an observer particles go through one opening or another (linear timeline/single dimension). Without an observer they go through all openings (infinite timelines/infinite dimensions).

So using our best science theories to date. Either the universe was created by an external being outside the flow of time (God by definition) and we are in a single dimensioor there was no observer and there are infinite dimensions. However within infinite dimension there will exist a dimension with a being that can transcend dimensions and timeliness since this is one of the infinite possible.

In either scenario there is a higher power. While the rest of us big brains discuss why we think our higher power is the one everyone should follow, you atheist midwits are so closed minded you even ignore your own science that you spout to justify your atheism.

OP is in highschool

stop replying to slide threads, shits going down in canada

The only way you could verify the lack of existence of an all present omnipotent being to be all knowing and omnipotent yourself. As it stands you’re simply impotent

I never once mentioned le I fucking love science.

Also Schrodinger's cat was created to mock other scientists.

Post proof or find a flaw in my reasoning.

My reasoning contains nuance and anons seem allergic to such a concept.

>I am an atheist
Done. Mind is more fundamental than matter, so all atheism is nonsense

The onus is not on me to disprove the existence of god.

Much like the onus is not on me to disprove there are magical men in the keyboard who are making these letters appear on the screen.

your argument is predicated upon a demand for material evidence of an axiom which is immaterial in nature to begin with. LOL midwits.

If You don’t believe in God you must not believe in good or evil.

So putting a bullet in your head won’t matter much to you, but for me it’s a victory.

Thanks for letting me know ahead of time so I can dismiss the guilt.

that is an argument he attacked your epistemology directly by the implication of causality and the necessity of prime movement. he did it by making an absurdity out of your midwit position, which is awesome

>I see no proof for the existence of god therefore I do not believe in god.
No proof of God is not proof of no God.
you failed the logic part of your exam, for one, no offense.
The early Europeans didn't believe that gorillas existed either, when they were first told about them.

Have you considered the possibility that you have free will,
that you are already living in hell,
and if you choose not to believe in God, that means you stay here, because that was the choice you made?

Have you considered that you'll be the one sending yourself to hell as a result of your own choice to go there?

>I see no proof for the existence of god therefore I do not believe in god.
You believe in all kinds of shit without proof though.

you’re like a little baby lol

Attached: 19AC3790-8208-4EA0-BF8C-A7E821D5906A.jpg (1024x725, 267.2K)

>not trying to convince
bro what do you think argumentation is? this is such a cop out.