What's to stop Russia from just detonating a nuclear weapon over Kyiv? NATO wouldn't dare respond...

What's to stop Russia from just detonating a nuclear weapon over Kyiv? NATO wouldn't dare respond, and sanctions only go so far.

Attached: 1577176055529.png (811x705, 393.8K)

Other urls found in this thread:

polnewscentral.com/?page=qui&id=1412
archive.is/gZ8VD
polnewscentral.com/?page=pol&id=1807
archive.is/3EA90
polnewscentral.com/?page=joggers&id=1393
archive.is/HYRp2
polnewscentral.com/?page=other&id=1431
archive.is/Ncatv
bitchute.com/video/kgM22utmR278/
archive.is/sefW3
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

One less weapon for them. They can't build new ones.

why did the faggots on TV change the name of Kiev To Kyiv
>some where in the back offices of CNN someone is laughing their ass off!

Attached: downloadhhh.jpg (712x562, 86.32K)

It's more accurate this way. They should name moscow Moskiw next.

Why not?

Coup in the Kremlin, changes in relations with China, Belarus, etc..

Too dumb and low IQ. High enough to build mock-ups but low enough to forget they are that.

Attached: 1639481864487.png (720x724, 496.35K)

poor maintenance, build quality, a lack of skilled manpower and leadership

Kyiv is the Ukranian transliteration, Kiev is the Russian, Polish is probably Kwiw or something

Frankly whenever someone starts arguing over transliteration, we should start referring to the subject as Burma. The capital of Ukraine is Burma.

You're trying to argue North Korea can build nukes but Russia can't. What's the American equivalent of armatard?