This is a proposition for the victory conditions of an asymmetrical right-wing insurgency against the global, liberal, big-tech-lead state.
This is a proposition for the victory conditions of an asymmetrical right-wing insurgency against the global, liberal...
Lincoln Kelly
Jackson Ward
1. Self-Improvement
- Independent study of a vital STEM subject, construction, navigation, or basic survival
- Gathering valuable literature from the pre-Internet era, and reading that, rather than anything found on the Internet
- Awareness that whatever one consumes will program one's mind over time; no one is immune to this
- Reduced consumption of entertainment and online socialization, including on anonymous imageboards; overall reduction of screentime and media influence
- Adoption of a long-term physical exercise routine, no matter how relaxed or rigorous
2. Financial and Material Independence
- Exchange of currency for physical wealth
- Establishment of direct trade for essential goods between trusted people
- Minimization of continued dependence on industrially produced goods
- Reduction in usage of any modern technology utilizing the Internet
- Gradual departure from the financial system and any means to be tracked by it
- Development or seizing of the means of production
3. Dethroning of Big Brother
- Development of a decentralized instant messaging and social media platform, attractive to the general public like Reddit and TikTok, but unadministrable on a large-scale (Any Forums, Telegram, and Tor boards will be compromised eventually)
- Nullifying of Big Tech data-mining efforts by flooding the Internet with AI-generated garbage content
- Making public surveillance obsolete by releasing an endless stream of AI-generated fake content
- Compromising Big Tech from within by infiltrating them over several years
Samuel Ward
4. Dismantling of Hostile Media
- Infiltration with the aim of furthering infighting, while avoiding direct involvement
- Studying the grammar, vocabulary, overall writing style, habits, and psychology of chosen targets
- Shutting down moderate voices, such as by framing them for being right-wing collaborators, furthering the purity spiral
- Real-life psychological torture of journalists who profess anti-white views and/or are guilty of dishonesty and disintegrity
- Employment of Zersetzung, methods used by the Ministerium für Staatsicherheit, against the aforementioned
5. Destruction of Cancel Culture
- Targeting of individuals responsible for implementing Anti-Hate Speech Laws
- Acceleration of the purity spiral among hostile media by aforementioned means
- Development of the aformentioned decentralized social platform
6. Erasure of Feminism
- Removal of female political and institutional power within liberal democracies
- Abolition of government mandated wealth transfers to divorced or single females
- Inhibition of all birth control within white communities, except for undesirables
- Physical and cultural banishment of feminists and traitorous females
- Public shaming of excessive public promiscuity, for non-prostitute females
Alexander Bennett
7. Establishment of Ethnic Enclaves and Reversion of White Flight
- The long-term physical and economic takeover of formerly white, nowadays non-white and liberal areas, starting from the friendliest, whitest suburbs and advancing towards ghettoes - by any means available
- Starting local small businesses, subverting any hostile businesses, disrupting undesirables who receive welfare, eventually driving away undesirables
8. Simultaenous but Separate Bottom-Up and Top-Down Activity
- By the end of the year every single capable and conscious white man, if they want to change the future, needs to either be part of a grass-roots cell or have their sights set on a long-term infiltration or business project
- Grass-roots level actors operate within cells of up to five people, and collaborate with other cells horizontally, preferring anonymity where possible
- Top-level actors operate or infiltrate hierarchies and effect organizational change as lone actors, avoiding any connections with right-wing organizations or figures
- Any collaboration across top-level and grass-roots level actors must be conducted in absolute anonymity or risk being compromised
9. Avoiding infighting
- Rivalry among European ethnicities must be treated as friendly banter
- Religious questions ought to be resolved on a community by community basis
- Always keep common mid-term goals on mind when approaching disagreement
- Individuals who sow seeds of white emasculation, right-wing in-fighting, or demoralization of any kind should be confronted, and as a final recourse be collectively ignored
- Owing to the overall tendencies of female behavior, women but also feminine people in general should not hold power - especially if they try to influence or change the plan - as this has too often led to infighting - women must either absolutely follow the rules or entirely stay out
Wyatt Mitchell
Once a reasonable set of goals can be agreed on, each cell will choose which ones they are capable and willing of advancing. The left-wing agitation, lockdown frustration, and economic downturn in recent years makes 2022 a good year to recruit and begin operating.
Kayden Johnson
Bump.
Leo Cox
Jaxon Young
Camden Howard
Alexander Morgan
Jaxon Clark
leafs should all read this
Nathaniel Nguyen
Bump
Jonathan Wood
Nolan Parker
Dylan Collins
I would suggest departure from your "right wing" addition to that Bulgarian suggested tactics. Even here it's an umbrella turn that is more separating than unifying. Is it ancap, conservative or nation-state based? Or is it about Cu-clux-clan? Or monarchism? Or hardcore christianity?
There's however a common evil that is to be resisted in the global powers. There is a base I believe that people of good will can join upon. I would suggest to try toformulate the ideals that are universal.
Is there something that separates "us" and "them" for you?
Ayden Richardson
You are correct, seeing as the classical left-right division has nothing to do with present reality except being divisive rhetoric. However, then we need a name to identify by - either based on what people stand for, or what they oppose. How would you rephrase this? I couldn't come up with a good name myself. Anti-globalist is accurate but might sound tinfoily due to association.
Jordan Sanders
Ian Walker
Chase Carter
Wyatt Moore
anti-status quo is what people used to call themselves during OWS. It didn't work. When you say
>we're open to all ideologies, come join us!
you attract trannies like a magnet. They will specifically target and join your movement to ensure that it is not against trannies. Then the next to follow are niggers. Not based black man niggers but violent BLM ones. Then jews. And before you realize what's happening your movement already looks like /r/antiwork and your openness to trannies and niggers and all the rest is held as a blackmail should you ever deviate. Instead of deviating you're forced to double down even more until your movement is a crude mockery of what it once was.
Opticscucking is a dumb tactic. Your enemies realize that they can hold your desire to maintain optics against you and collapse your movement through it.
>4. "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."
Aiden Ward
. Destruction of Cancel Culture
> - Targeting of individuals responsible for implementing Anti-Hate Speech Laws
won't make the law go away, you need to target the people who run that person
> - Acceleration of the purity spiral among hostile media by aforementioned means
yes
> - Development of the aformentioned decentralized social platform
yes
also: introduce false-targets, so it starts to eat itself
Landon Young
Anti-globalist already has a history under it, so it suggests something.
I wanted to add. Remember how occupy wall Street was subverted by identity politics? Modern day leftists could easily be on the right (not like left-right, but like wrong-right) side, but social engineering unfortunately works.
There's a way to settle argments in the unorganized movement - let the ideas be the judge. I was wondering what are yours. It's hard to formulate, but the right ones can be unifying.
James Davis
have a bump finnbro
Jack Harris
I think groups of 2-5 people may still be too big. If one gets captured or compromised they can still reveal information on the other 1-4 people in the group. The resistance should follow the same decentralized pattern yet take place at the atomic unit - an individual person. One should also not underestimate the influence one individual can get if they infiltrate the system. It's really not that hard to lie about having pro-globohomo views - the brainwashing is everywhere, you simply have to repeat the kosher phrases when interrogated.
Having a clear set of goals is an important and it's something leftists/liberals lack. They all want vague things such as "equality" and "to end racism". However these goals should be sorted by priority - for example I think dismantling hostile media is among the most important since that is how globohomo programs NPCs. Depending on whether or not anti-Orwellianism is in the core set of principles, Big Brother and Cancel Culture could also be co-opted to serve a national socialist regime.
Hudson Price
have another bump
this is probably the best thread on Any Forums right now
Aaron Garcia
>I think groups of 2-5 people may still be too big.
That's the historical experience of revolutionary cells. Disrupting something solo can lead only to school-shootings. The American way. The loss of several people was always an acceptable risk. It's exponentially harder to work solo.
It shouldn't all-inclusive it should separate right from wrong