R/fuckcars

Attached: B53F55D2-6BB2-4500-9A29-C053DE72E499.jpg (640x766, 71.55K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_streetcar_conspiracy
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Public transport is for peasants, which explains why europoors love it so much

lol sneed i went for a drive just to get a burger, i love north america and driving the car

Fucking europoor trash can't afford vehicles. I drive my 4x4 jeep and not even the road can contain my fury.

"bike enabled" is the biggest faggotry. People dont prefer to ride bikes because it's faster and easier to drive. Bikes are MORE capable of handling uncurrated terrain than cars. So anywhere cars can drive bikes can too. All "bike enabling" does is make it harder to drive. They justify it to themselves by believing that'll encourage less driving.

Sounds great, he should stay there.

sorry but i will not sell my audi a4.

taking the loser cruiser ? Kek

>confining yourself to the open-air prison
Bus can't take you out to the good roads.

Attached: 625236.jpg (3072x2304, 1.32M)

Privatize all roads, railroads, docks, airports, ferries, trolleys, ETC

London is a nightmare no matter how you travel around it.

It's funny how the only people who hate cars live in shitholes with 20+lane highways and standstill traffic.
You never hear anyone who lives in North Carolina complain about driving.
It's almost like pleasant roads to drive on and proper management of traffic is enough to make people like cars and the solution is traffic isn't "just add more lanes lmao"

>NOOOOOOOOOO you can´t improve a city so that it will be healthier, more eco-friendly, more quiet, better to live in for everybody and faster to get around!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Everything HAS TO be designed in a way where a car is literally the only viable option!!
Why? Well because......

>lower standard of living is good for you, goy!
I don’t care about bicycles. I don’t care it cities are easy to cycle around. I care thaf (((moneyed interests))) are trying to convince me that I should only be allowed to own a bicycle, and should be punished for owning a luxury item like a car.
First it will be cars, then it will be property you don’t live on. Then it will be rural property in general. Then it will be a home anywhere.
“You will own nothing, and you will be happy”

Attached: 1616342992906.jpg (690x634, 77.93K)

/thread

Truly a nightmare, everything is so poor and grey and old and decaying, and the women really are 10/10 bongland
But LA is an even deeper part of hell, I'm pretty sure it's Satan's permanent residence

HAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHa, how much of a brainwashed retard do you have to be?
The most (((moneyed interests))) want your cities to be car dependent shitholes like most of north america. What are the largest companies in the world? Are they bike manufacturers? Fucking schizos man.

Here since you enjoy conspiracies so much on here:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_streetcar_conspiracy

a car is freedom. in many places you are obly allowed to use public transport if you're a vaxcattle. Imagine advocating for the state to have the ability to take your ability to travel away from you. fucking cuck

Without the state propping up car companies, building your roads and maintaining them, that system would cease to exist fast. Cars cant go unless its a flat road paid for by every taxpayer. Oh did I forget to mention roads are an ugly eyesore and ruin ecosystems?

IF a state would want you to stop travelling anywhere, like authoritarian states regularly do, they could (and will) simply set up roadblocks, checkpoints or close down gas stations. You know what doesn´t require extra infrastructure to get from a to b in an emergency? You two feet or a bicycle.

>(((cities)))

Providing roads are literally the only thing a government should do. Cope you little globohomo cuck.

Fuck libtard hippies

Attached: IMG_20220107_193128.jpg (2000x1500, 1.07M)

>rides bike away from pursuers
>get shot or run over
Wow, amazing!

The issue with anti-car agitation is that they’re focused on the wrong things. You’ll never achieve your aims looking at cars, bikes, roads, parking lots, or highways. Transportation is wrong because the buildings are wrong and if you fix the buildings, you’d have to pay people to drive. The forced separation of where people live, work, learn, shop, and play needs to end so that the distances people have to travel each week can be shrunk to a manageable size. That only happens when population densities increase to provide labor and customer base for a full suite of amenities based inside a neighborhood. Our built environment is all wrong for car-free life and higher gas taxes won’t change that faster than political expedience eliminates those taxes.

Like you could runout bullets with your car bubba.
With a bike you dont make any noise, dont need any fuel and leave very little trace.
But thats not what this thread is about

Kind of true, but like with all things, carrot and stick works best. Having a positive image to present is used best to win over normies, butt since were on Any Forums, being smug and contrrian is the way to go

americans are so addicted to the fake freedom that a car brings because they have been indoctrinated to be so by years of car advertising. they will even go so far to defend cars on anonymous imageboards.

>"bike enabled" is the biggest faggotry. People dont prefer to ride bikes because it's faster and easier to drive. Bikes are MORE capable of handling uncurrated terrain than cars. So anywhere cars can drive bikes can too.
Bike enabling isn't about terrain, it's about making it so that you have separate bike lanes and don't get hit by some dumb woman driving 50 on a stroad with her 4 ton SUV.

Sure. If you want a 30 minute journey to take 1.5 hours.

This.
I've literally been two places in my life where I felt an overwhelming evil presence when I was there and LA was one of them. It was weird because it was in such a beautiful place. Like it could have been beautiful in another world.