Why did Any Forums abandon libertarianism?

Why did Any Forums abandon libertarianism?

Attached: Ron_Paul_by_Gage_Skidmore_3_(crop_1).jpg (800x1066, 155.56K)

it was too keyed

We became adults

Because capitalism as an economic system demands mass migration and women in the workplace, for more profits. And as a libertarian you are powerless to correct social ills or counter subversion. It is an extremely unstable system.

200 years ago when the industrial revolution started and individualism was no longer a winning strategy

I didn't exactly abandon libertarianism but you need to be a Hoppean libertarian, it takes a lot of unprincipled exceptions to make a free society work and one of those is you can't tolerate anyone hostile to a free society so all leftists etc need to be exiled or killed.

Also women are BY NATURE slaves and hostile to the idea of a free society so slaves women must be.

this this this

fellow based norwegian.

Literally because it is controlled opposition. Ironically, the only government system that's been tried in the past 200 years or so is a wildly spreading federal "democracy" that's powered by capitalism. The idea of self governmental regulation is idiotic to basically everyone, so the only way to keep a libertarian government is if the people keep a libertarian government through the threat of violence. Complacency on the other hand, will just lead back to the system we currently live in.

On the other hand, ironically, the same people who boast about governmental corruption will post uniroincally about NatSoc in a manner that implies that they're not the government, and wouldn't equally be corrupt, so they're fine with giving them power over almost all social freedoms. Don't get me wrong, I love the concept on paper, but it's just not practical, as the only practical option is a government who fears its people.

Ron is one of the only politicians I genuinely like but libertarianism just cannot work while others can form collectives that can crush individuals. The only way to ensure libertarianism could flourish would be the power of a stat thereby defeating the purpose of libertarianism.

The constant hope that the next election will fix the unfixable problems within government and society only last so long. Libertarianism is fine when you have small problems that can be dealt with by changing a few laws but beyond that it is a mental trap to keep people contained

We grew up

I didnt. Ron Paul is unironically right about everything.

Finally some fucking sense.

NPC meme destroys libertarianism.

I am still libertarian.

I just think it should only apply to straight white Christian males and that all other groups, religions, and genders should be ruled over with an iron fist.

The principles of libertarianism always advise my views but it is just not a winning political ideology in a modern western election.

Dumb people make it impossible. The movie Idiotocracy was set in a libertarian world.

>the only way to keep a libertarian government is if the people keep a libertarian government through the threat of violence.
Untrue. Constitutional Fascism is the answer. A central dictator that is empowered by the people to use the military to enforce the constitution against the government.

The people need a personal avatar to keep the government in check.

A libertarian society paradoxically cannot tolerate ANY opposition to the idea of a free society, PARTICULARLY among its ingroup. Outgroup nigs who dissent are less dangerous.

A monarchy is better actually... long term property interest is a better guarantee of good behavior than demotic virtue.