Hey yall I'm in a DC jail waiting for trial... MAGA! He will bail me out any day now right?
Jaxon Turner
Are people actually harassing the people who were illegally doxed, because they made donations to a group of working class people who oppose being used as medical test subjects?
Doesn't matter. Biden's polls are worse than Trump's for the same period and they skewed the absolute shit out of it even
Gabriel Brooks
Vote out every politician who voted for the 2021 NDAA or Biden in January 2021! Use davesredistricting.org to make your own districts for your state & local races.
To find a RINO locally: Check for Soros, SPLC, ADL, WEF, & CFR connections. If a single member of a political dynasty is corrupt, they're all corrupt. Purge them all. Also, make sure your local Republicans know you support election security measures: pastebin.com/wdvPS1Ey
Furthermore, get involved locally. Do anything for redistricting! Get referenda on ballots! If you can write legislation, then use your talents accordingly. If you're better off running for office yourself, then do it. If you should just help someone else's campaign, do that. Use your talents, which God gave to you, wisely. No matter where you live, you should check if you have elections this year--we need to get people signed up to run before signup deadlines ASAP! 2022 election deadlines can be this year as well, so be sure to check those quickly!
Become a pollwatcher; become a candidate; become a staffer! Anything you can do to make America great again, do it! Go to redistricting meetings and make your voice heard!
Explanations: hatebin.com/qgqapyqliw Endorsements: Mar. 1, TX-2: Jameson Ellis May 7, TX: Yes May 24, AL: no June 7, SD: yes Aug. 2, KS: YES
Nov. 8: AL: Yes AK: no AZ: 1Y 3N AR: YES CA: NO CO: Yes CT: NO FL: YES GA: YES ID: yes IL: NO IA: YES KY: YES LA: NO, Yes, NO, Yes, no MD: No, yes, Yes MA: NO MO: Yes, no MT: no, YES, Yes NV: NO NH: no NM: NO NY: NO OR: NO SD: NO TN: YES, NO, yes UT: YES VT: NO WV: YES WY: Yes
Newsmax actually claimed that Transnistria is part of Ukraine on a map today.
Yeah but midterms will be an absolute bloodbath. Blue voters are unenergized as fucked because Biden has done nothing for them and Red voters are super pissed and will likely be volunteering for poll watching duty. Everyone is going to be super on edge about fraud and trying to get King Dementia out.
There are Russian soldiers in Transnistria, but they've been there for 25 years as peacekeeping forces. It's like saying S. Korea is occupied by Americans. Also they missed South Ossetia. Ask them about Afghanistan and they'll get furious.
>Ask them about Afghanistan and they'll get furious. It will be nice to have a few actual hearings about that fuckup when Republicans take over. Plenty of people at DoD who aren't happy about that I'm sure.
Only one state even reached 50% approval. Seethe and Dilate.
Liam Russell
first of all, why censor the name of the reporter? they have no qualms about harassing the donors but you're protecting their privacy? fight just as dirty goddammit, publish the reporter's name and let's see how they like getting unwanted attention
secondly i saw some accounts defending this with >they're just reporting the facts, there was no spin >are you saying reporters shouldn't seek and publish the facts??? which gets back to something i have said before there is no such thing as unbiased, objective reporting. the choice to publish something runs contrary to the choice not to publish it. it doesn't matter about "facts" - epistemology aside, if we could pretend the news could only report pure objective Truths (hahahaha yeah right) it's STILL possible to present lies or slant with that. see: that cartoon showing the news portray an image of man ready to stab another as the other way around. selective presentation or omission, heavy framing and overcontextualization, there's all sorts of tricks up a reporter's sleeve to write an opinion as though it were fact without even needing to engage in bare-faced lies
tracking and bothering incredibly small donors for that isn't reporting. it's intimidation and harassment. it is in no public interest or fair equal-handed dealing to target people who donate $250 or $40. plenty of people spent far more on bail and trial charges of actual criminals in violent acts two years ago but the same reporters were not hunting down and badgering the small nor large donors to that. that shows the reporter isn't caring about "the Truth no matter what," the reporter is acting as an arm of political activism, knowingly, and lies about it to protect his actions or even present them as some noble calling
that is the key. many reporters spend time in communications study. they know what they're doing, it's not accidental. they think they're clever and outwitted you this is why people call for blood
>shacking up with a cootie vector >not having room for your stuff no way! >why censor the name of the reporter He said somewhere that the recipient didn't want any identifying text included. I assume he feared retaliation, which is likely.