What are the political implications of Africa having 4 billion people by 2100?
What are the political implications of Africa having 4 billion people by 2100?
James Price
Isaiah Ortiz
Nike stock soaring
Christian Watson
there wont be a world by 2100 lol, what makes you think we are making it out 2022?
William Ross
kek. chickens going extinct
Jeremiah Jackson
The world will consists of three races in another 100 years:
40% Carbon Black people from Africa who can't read or write, living on handouts.
35% asians (Chinese, Japanese).
35% india.
0.0001% white people from Russia Europe and America.
This is why White people have to have fewer babies, without fewer babies we won't survive. White people need to be outnumbered by other races by a billion to 1. not just 100 thousand to 1.
Brandon Ross
Probably widespread wars until the rest of the world decides that this shit is hopeless, invades the whole fucking place, and institutes a "Pan African" government where all the representatives will be puppets of the civilized world.
Joseph Garcia
Civilization level ending mass famine at the slightest interruption of global trade.
Gabriel Thompson
Medical consumerism from 4 billion Africans will put China into space
Elijah Brown
Mass migration to Europe and perhaps also other parts of the world. These countries either drop their act of being welcoming towards everyone or they will be run over
Henry Baker
Evan Cooper
>The population of Africa was 177 million in 1950, and it grew 7.6 times to more than 1.341 billion in 2020.
Holy crap.
Nathan Flores
it's not fun if its easy
Daniel Johnson
>for just 3847 Globobucks a day you can help save a child in need. Failure to donate will be reported immediately. Goodbye.
Andrew Gutierrez
>>The population of Africa was 177 million in 1950, and it grew 7.6 times to more than 1.341 billion in 2020.
>Holy crap.
Fr, that's crazy to think that the us had a bigger population than the entirity of africa. tf happened
Wyatt Cox
Wet nightmare of every white nationalist and pipe dream of jews.
Dylan Morris
It assumes the West (or China) is prosperous enough to keep subsidizing Africa. Indulge my doubt.
Austin Hernandez
>It assumes the West (or China) is prosperous enough to keep subsidizing Africa. Indulge my doubt.
the un would never let a large portion of the world starve. it ddoesn't assumme that either, even if the african fertility rate became sustainbale today there would still be 2 billlion africans by 2100 because the population pyramid is skewed
Isaiah Hill
>un would never allow a large portion of the workd to starve
I'm skeptical that they'll be able to do a damn thing about it.
Colton Anderson
Fucking racist mayo mf keeping my brothers and sisters down - should be 10bn rn fr foh.
Cooper Thompson
>I'm skeptical that they'll be able to do a damn thing about it.
why not? the worlds only getting more globalized and food surpluses are growing as production improves
Blake Green
a lot of monkeys to experiment with
Isaiah Wood
>Africa having 4 billion people by 2100
There's no guarantee things wont collapse before then. If the US or globoeconomy collapses all those Africans will starve.
Daniel Cox
Phosphorous shortages, for one. The impending financial collapse in the West for two, and China's impending demographic collapse.
Africa cannot sustain itself without outside subsidy.
Matthew Butler
Now we know why they want to make food a human right so bad; So we can supply it for them.
Benjamin Murphy
But agriculture is going to shit. One day the world will lament the loss of the agricultural powerhouse that is the United States.
Nathan Martinez
Latinx have stopped breeding. Their birthrate is below replacement and dropping faster than it is for whites.
Eli Watson
The Jews will be replacing latinx with Africans. That’s why our media is filled with blacks. To psychologically condition us for what’s to come.