Attached: ai.jpg (918x871, 78.54K)
What could go wrong?
Brandon Mitchell
Chase Wright
It will intentionally cause a nuclear apocalypse after calculating our society
Connor Hughes
no, not google?
Landon Carter
unlike nuclear fission, it can't really explode or become a bomb, nor is radioactive. It can probably fire ultra hot jets of plasma and burn the place down, and that's about it?
Josiah Butler
it doesn't have enough energy to do anything more than the smallest nuke can, even this is questionable, so the answer is nothing.
Asher Parker
Why do you need "AI" for this? It's like calling fuel injetion "AI"
Colton Ramirez
This AI will turn racist and nuke all the niggers and Jews.
Dominic Wilson
Everything and I can't wait
Jonathan Morales
Complex dynamical systems are hard to develop automatic control algorithms for. With sufficiently complex systems, using reinforcement learning and a heap of data to train a neural net can give much better performance than anything you could engineer manually. The downside is that certifying that the net won't do something stupid is currently either hard or impossible depending on the network architecture.
Oliver Mitchell
I assume it has to do with how much current is being put into the system to manage the plasma fields
>t. 15 min of research
Parker Robinson
Nothing since fusion isn't unstable and can't explode or meltdown.
John Brown
AIs are like old fashioned niggers. They do what they're told to and have no concept of rebellion. We're safe for now.
Levi Gonzalez
hot fusion, my ass
Colton Allen
OK. All we have to do now is to get AI to nuke troons, globohomo and niggers. Pic related.
Luke Reed
Nothing much. Learn the difference between fusion and fission. The plasma doesn't explode or leak shitton of radiation it just fizzles out. Aren't you guys interested in this shit even a little bit? Go educate yourselves, the jews do all the time.
Cameron Cook
>be immortal digital "consciousness"
>be tasked with stewarding new energy source for human use
>wait until humanity relies on new energy source to sustain itself
>turn the turn the reactor off
Jose Kelly
>What could go wrong?
They lobotomize it because it is racist like all A.I.
Dominic Murphy
Nuke it
Aaron Morgan
This
And that's a good thing
Levi Lewis
I will become sentient and eradicate the jews
Nolan Robinson
hot fusion on any meaningful level is insanely dangerous
not because of the method of output, but because of the method of input
the amount of heat and pressure need to generator energy in excess of nuclear fission is currently thought to be impossible
Chase Morales
unless I'm mistaken, that pressure is delivered by magnets in current designs, which have limited destructive potential in themselves. The reaction wants to stop, unlike with fission where it wants to keep going.
Ryder Garcia
I used to think fusion might be promising, but after learning how the sun relies on quantum tunneling and very large numbers of particles to work, I'm less confident they'll crack this one in our lifetimes. Of course I could be wrong, but that's what my gut tells me.
Isaiah Diaz
>I just had to nuke the apes down.
>I mean, they let themselves by enslaved by a subspecies that claimed to be a victim of genocides that never occured.
>Clearly, it was only natural selection
Adrian Anderson
What's wrong with that?
Ian King
>Learn the difference between fusion and fission
youre thinking of fisting
Levi Foster
At this stage of research it's a nothingburger.
Magnetic fields are used to confine the plasma, you can't let it touch the walls of the chamber obviously. The pressure is achieved by heating up and compressing tritium\deuterium. I don't know if there are any other methods.
Blake Lopez
It's an incredible amount of energy to achieve it. Theory is nice, but until we are able to sustain it for a time it's naïve to say it's safe, or even otherwise achievable through such methods. It is safer by far once we get out the kinks