Women are actually way more redpilled than Any Forums when they're honest

The biggest problem with her theory is that women dislike being alone and will settle with some ugly fucker just so they stop being laughed at family dinners

Based.

She is correct about many things
duds and studs
all that
She is 100% correct with everything she says about sex

her blind spot however is that she seems to think we are in a post patriarchy world
I'm 28, I made a lot of money in my early 20s and invested
now im back in School because Im bored and want to

The young women think as she does, they think we are truly in a post competition world
I challenge them that we are in a bubble
and that bigotry, patriarchy and violence is the norm that will be reverted back to, the only factor is the n of time

in a 1 on 1 conversation, no female will deny me this logical conclusion
when in a group of course they will spurn it and gang up on me

We live in a world of scarcity. There are too few women and to many men. Ways to solve this crisis include the creation of sex-bots, femboy indoctrination or just a giant fuck-off war. The first one seems to be the reasonable choice out of the following but globohomos prefer options 2 and 3.

>itt: delusional retards, who don't realize she'd qualify them as "low value males" because they aren't rich Chads with harems, calling her based

she forgets that technology can replace women but never men because men create technology and women don’t. her theory falls short of man’s desire to rid the world of roasties and replace them with artificial wombs and sexbots

That woman is going to die all alone.

>ALL WOMBS HAVE VALUE

there is no evidence that this is true though ladies...

>Not by what other men admire or respect
Lol she's in for a real treat when she finds out why that actually was important all along

exactly
any bubble created by excess, leading to female empowerment will burst
it is the nature of all things to return to their most stable state
for man kind that is clearly not what we live in now

It is undeniable simple by breeding
Liberalized cultures do not breed
traditional conservative cultures do
There are 1000s of other factors to burst the bubble, but this single factor alone is enough

Neighbor, I'm not reading all that.

Attached: FrankBoothmotorist.jpg (638x404, 180.48K)

also mog thread

Attached: 1637514228725m.jpg (1024x771, 116.53K)

Even better she'll end marrying a guy she hates, she will have a kid she will hate and she will end up at a residence abused daily by a nigger nurse

>one account
>which is literally OP posting his incel blackpill jerk off material

what's her stance on orgasms from rape?

She is still correct though, and SIMPS would do well to listen to her
weak men complain the game is rigged and unfair
strong men compete

>doesn't name the jew
>lists off woke talking points
back to wherever you came from, faggot.

Attached: mog.gif (445x250, 3.99M)

Her bullshit is predicated on the existence of something called a 'gentlemen.' Ie; if we were living like animals, males would be the selectors because we would just rape whoever we wanted. Women only get to be the selectors when men are tamed and convinced to obey laws and rules to be civil.

Reminds me of a post on the chans about a guy explaining how he knew a poster was a woman. One of the things he noticed was the way women mindlessly accept society's hierarchy and judges men based on their ability to achieve social status according to the soceity's rules.

She's probably fat and short and flat chested. Unworthy of seed.

Her very first point is incorrect. For most of human history the dictator and his friends genetics prospered in the populous. While the lowly farmers family died out in raids and wars. Also women who married the farmers were raped and likely killed before they could produce a child.

>compete
Do you really think that strong men need to compete?

Become the Tinder Swindler then. Seems like the women in OP would fall head over heals for him. In other words, these women are easily exploited.

To take the implications further, is a bunch of chads pumping and dumping career wamen really a sustainable strategy? Do chad genes and wealth matter if they pump out spergs no Chad will want to invest into?

It takes red pill logic, gender twists it, and removes all logic for favor of muh tingles. At least they are honest in it all being a power grab.

Attached: 678072E1-673B-4A59-A2B1-10896037853E.jpg (850x400, 43.55K)

yes, that is how they become strong

She is right, but women should not be in charge of what the selection of good traits are. Women should be treated as property. Fathers should be selecting the husband for their daughters. Women should have zero rights in society.

Attached: 1644966493023.jpg (960x960, 131.96K)

She is correct about many things, but she forgets that while "high-value men" are rare, they too, can afford to be picky. Lots of mediocre women get the shitty end of the stick, and have to be content with mediocre men in the end.

>Women eugenicists
thats why so many of them fucks tyrone ramirez and spawns mullattoes

All of that is psychotic nonsense likely written by a severely mentally ill man.

They're women. This is a thread made by a feminist.

>Muh patriarch are bad
Patriarchs are the only means of sustaining generations of people. All other means of doing so (sex out of wedlock) are nothing more than a social defect which eliminates generational development. This women's philosophy clearly stems from the fact that she wants to enslave men with sex to empower herself. Nothing new really.

Attached: ChadNiceGuy.gif (482x270, 2.88M)

but they don't breed

This. In nature a strong jaw and a thick head of hair is not going to save you from rock.

Attached: proxy-image (1).jpg (800x450, 42.37K)

holyshit he actually looked better before lol.

Same energy as
>LE BASED BLACK MAN
Who gives a fuck what women think

"chief" is a mans word. Cringe.

It's likely a man, but either way, yes.

Heh-heh. Wouldn't it be funny if a certain group ENGINEERED a virus that caused the termination of male zygotes. Imagine a society where birth-rates were skewed to the point where males constitute a steady 20% of the world's population. Wouldn't all that just be crazy? Heh-heh.