This Starcraft game represents the modern political situation. The US is Terran. China is Zerg. Russia is Protoss.
Zerg was walled up in their base while Protoss and the Terran expanded. They fought in the center of the map, and Protoss lost. Now only having their home base remaining. But because they were so big before, they have very high level technology.
After this happened, Zerg rushed to expand across the map and took 5 bases. They built an incredible amount of workers, and are now soaking up resources from all those bases and beginning to research their tech tree. Although they have a high production, their military capacity is currently fairly low right now, it will take time to build more units especially since they're teching up.
If you are playing as the Terran in this scenario, who do you attack? What is your strategy going to be?
A) Pounce on the Zerg in their moment of weakness, before their tech and production kicks in B) Play a longer game, try to outmass the Zerg over time, starting from a worker deficit. However this would allow the Protoss to begin massing again too. C) Rush all your units into the Protoss and ignore the Zerg for now.
Option A is winning. You already have this game won as things stand, so just take your victory to the bank. Attack the Zerg and win the game. Before they have the chance to produce more units or rise their tech tree.
Option B is potentially throwing the game. You are taking a game that you already won, and pushing it into the uncertain future, where you only now have a chance of winning. And you even have the worker disadvantage at the outset, so you are actually behind in the long game.
Option C is completely losing. Unless you think the Protoss is so weak that you can overrun them with no effort. You will invest your precious resources into a military attack on Protoss, while Zerg rises to outpace you. This is the bad option that no strategic person would choose.
>With Joe Biden leadership we have defeated Russia and stopped the invasion of Ukraine by saying words Him and that French guy who used to work for Rothschilds need to campaign on this one.
I'm just going to tell you from someone who has watched hundreds of starcraft games. When someone expands to more bases, that is a big investment of resources. They are very vulnerable in that moment. All your instincts should be screaming: "attack". Doubly so if they are investing into tech, because that's also a big investment that leaves them with a low army supply.
If, however, you wait for their lead in bases/technology to kick in over time, you are going to get crushed. You MUST attack. That is how you keep them in check. That is the correct response. If you have more military and fewer workers, you need to march across the map and trade some of your military for their workers. If you don't do this, you lose the game.
The US, strategically, should be attacking China aggressively right now. Of course the US would never do that. But you could do the next best thing and try outmassing China over time. What you would NEVER want to do, is to attack a country completely unrelated to China and let the Chinese have the game. That's the absolute worst thing
Cooper Martinez
gonna miss that fella
he got bullied and mad and broke his ipad many such cases sad sad SAD!
Faceberg recently set a record for most money lost by a us firm in a day at 230 billion and zuckerkike lost 31 bn in valuation himself, the GDP of Estonia.
