Why are gays so hated in far right spaces

Head over to Any Forums. You can get called a faggot by your own kind, you don't need anyone here to do it for you.

but they don't go around robbing people and being a nuisance. at least being a criminal is somewhat manly. i'm sure some of those 'wild boys' were even war vets. now they just preach about fag rights and equality. doubt the people in your pic did that (but if they did then the nazis deserved to kick their ass)

Gay is a prerequisite for national socialism

youtu.be/A7xsdHnNMfs

Attached: 1639692055386m.jpg (661x1024, 98.04K)

No, just spreading AIDS and degeneracy. And there are FAR more of them and their "culture" is far more prominent in America than it ever was in Weimar Germany. Allowing gay rights in America was one of the worst mistakes any nation ever made. It will basically end the country along with all the other woke bullshit. But almost all of that would be impossible without the very recent faggot push in the mid-2000s.

Because our tolerance, acceptance and normalization of your disgusting behavior erodes Christian values, perverts children, spreads disease, and honestly just smells worse than the designated shitting street in india

Attached: a7DjNX2_700b.jpg (600x338, 42.13K)

precisely, the U.S is worse than weimar.

There were known gay men in the Nazi movement, most notably Ernst Röhm. Röhm used the word “gleichgeschlechtlich,” same-sex oriented, to describe himself. He was the leader of the SA (Sturmabteilung, commonly called Stormtroopers), a violent and radical Nazi paramilitary.

For Röhm, his sexuality did not conflict with Nazi ideology or compromise his role as SA leader. In Röhm’s understanding, legalizing sexual relations between men was not about encouraging liberal democratic rights or tolerance. Rather, he believed it was about the overthrow of mainstream morality. Röhm wrote that the “prudery” of some of his fellow Nazis “does not seem revolutionary to me.”

Röhm’s sexuality was an open secret in the Nazi Party that turned into a public scandal in 1931. A leftist newspaper outed Röhm as gay. His sexuality was then used in the election propaganda of the moderate-left Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands). Despite the controversy, Hitler defended Röhm. Röhm remained in charge of the SA until Hitler had him murdered in 1934.

Find me a single conservative gay group anywhere on Earth with more than maybe 5000 members. Even that's pushing it. Like muslims, all faggots are exactly the same. There is no redeeming them. They will never be allies to anything decent, only depravity. I speak from experience.

Correct. This nonsense that Germany was worse off than moder American is fucking nonsense. Modern America is literally the most death-worshipping, dying culture in the entire history of the human species. And what's worse is its evil is exported around the world. The current literal genocide against whites is inseparable from the faggot push.

Remain silent, fed piece of shit.

Because the majority seek empowerment and acceptance through the political opposite. Sure, at first a gay may just say "yeah, I'm a Democrat. I'm all for equality and freedom and stuff." But eventually that's not enough and then they have to accept the whole agenda. Anti-Gun, BLM, Trans Lives Matter; and as time goes on they get tainted by the hate of the left and start enforcing it. Your hard pressed to find a gay who will openly support right wing movements and/or who won't turn on you out of fear of coming out of the conservative closet. Same goes for trannies who ate just Nazi wannabes who are too scared to call the jews out and instead go after the majority. Because y'know. Incels.

Röhm, his face scarred from war wounds, stressed a hyper-masculinity to counteract contemporary views of homosexuality as feminine. A First World War veteran, Rohm “attached paramount importance to the values of militarized masculinity.” This aligned with Nazi views of the homosocial Männerbund. Such all-male organizations of warrior-comrades were supposed to be united under the banner of discipline and order against the threatening “wave” of the bourgeoisie, women, Jews, socialists, Bolsheviks, all of whom represented weakness, chaos, and disorder—in short, the Weimar Republic. Röhm suggested that the line between homosocial and homosexual, however, was potentially fluid.

For a society to function it must have people reproduce. Beyond that Western society requires a level of education and instilling of values done at home by parents. Homosexuality breaks both of those behaviors and threatens the society. You can look into statistics on families with absent fathers, singles mothers, etc. Most people don't give a shit who you are fucking, but if you are benefitting from the society you should be fulfilling your end of the social contract.

Goebbels took advantage of Rohm's sexuality for propaganda to appeal to conservatives, it had nothing to do with why he was assassinated. Hitler wasn't against homosexuality so long as it didn't overtly conflict with traditionalism.

Attached: 1552763454670.jpg (1568x2146, 998.93K)

Because saying faggot is, at times, the appropriate word. A type of man that doesn't want to be a man.. He ants to be something of a man but also a woman.
Cowards, NPCs, cucks, lgbtqs, others, they're all faggots.

You typical christian traditionalist morons don't even know why gay men are actually bad.

>Oh hurr durr no muh quiverfull
Breeding like mindless animals is the purview of lesser races. Fags destroy society because they spread INTENSE immorality like a cancer that seeps into everything.

there is a difference between being gay and a faggot. very few people are gay-meaning they just so happen to like the same sex and almost never bring it up or let it get in the way of their politics.

Faggots can't reproduce so they must recruit.

Attached: 2000vs2017.png (540x614, 490.87K)

Because faggots, like women, infect male spaces with their drama and make it all about themselves.
So you like to put stuff up your ass until you die from weird autoimmune deficiency diseases, big deal, shut the fuck up about you and let people talk about real problems.

/fash/ here.

It's one strike for rejecting the natural order
A second strike for rejecting struggle/the continuity of life.
A third strike for subversion.

Many people reject the natural order in one way or another because people do it by accident.
In layman's terms I would characterize this as "being an animal badly". Being fat is equally bad, smoking is equally bad- the "fucking a boy" part is like trying to eat a apricot and biting the stone- it's less a "sin" and more a "fail", sleeping with your cousin is in this same basket.
Fucking a woman in the ass is not really much better that fucking a boy- you failed to animal correctly.

The second offense is more serious, consciously rejecting the struggle is like suicide, it's an act that goes directly against your genetic continuity.
It's not just having sex with a boy- it's refusing to have sex with a woman. You're written yourself out of the gene pool; that's just as bad as suicide.
Killing one's children, killing oneself, self harm, starving yourself, neutering yourself.
Your haven't just failed to animal correctly- you've set yourself and your people up for extinction.
We will drive these people out of our society without second consideration, these people who have rejected survival are as good as dead.

The third offense is capitol
You havn't just lived poorly, you hacn't merely set yourself up for extinction- you didn't just kill yourself.
You have subverted another person. If this person is a citizen this is a capitol offense.
Because neutering yourself is just as bad as having an abortion, neutering someone else is just as bad as murder.
You are guilty of causing another man to reject the struggle.
This offence is far more serious than either of the proceeding offences, and is repeatable. You can only kill yourself once- but you can kill many other men.
In the same way you can promote homosexuality and cause many men to fail to reproduce.

>fash here
>It's one strike for rejecting the natural order
please read nietzsche
everything which exists is part of the 'natural order' by virtue of existing. it's a poor criticism and you help one yourself for failure.

and don't try to tell me which of my woman's holes to put my cock in otherwise i'll shank you.

>It's one strike for rejecting the natural order
A stupid non-argument, which is why your kind can never win and only cede ground every year.

>A second strike for rejecting struggle/the continuity of life.
That's strike two alright - for you.

>A third strike for subversion.
Literally the only thing you got right about faggotry being right. And this is why you keep losing.

This. Even this fed knows better.