What's the solution to (((wealth inequality)))?

What's the solution to (((wealth inequality)))?

Attached: 5de6a78efd9db209722b706a.jpg (1000x775, 52.5K)

Other urls found in this thread:

wtfhappenedin1971.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Same as the solution to all problems. National socialism

When you centralize power like that, how do you ensure that the government is carrying out the will of the people it's claiming to represent?

you realize youre asking that to specifically a non democratic ideology? the will of the people be damned if they dont will the strength of the nation.

So how do you decide who gets to make these decisions?

vaccine dieoff

Why would the kikes kill off all the people who listen to them and leave alive the ones who don't?

immortal god emperor

Unfuck the money. Death to central banks. Etc.

End the Fed

Attached: CF0E88DE-EAA4-4428-98C0-53595B7490A1.jpg (512x261, 106.1K)

now show the 1% in all age groups.

kill zoomers for complaining and for fucking up the English language

>kill zoomers
Full stop

No
Gold standard

okay buddy
A good start, but I also think you need to eliminate the stock market and replace it with a system of worker-ownership and community-based low interest loans from credit unions to truly decentralize the economy.
I can't find that chart.
I'm not opposed to this. They're kind of a lost cause.

whoever captivates and inspires the party and whether results flourish from their rule.

youre basically asking how do we ensure good governance, its the same struggle inherent in all ideologies, it depends on good honest men to hold to the ideals, even the smallest most decentralized governments are dependent on good honest men to carry forth their ideals, just look at the US or any small L liberal governments from the 19th century, even the best most fair ideas fall when men decide to interpret rules and limitations to their advantage, at the end of the day all non collectivist ideologies fall to the strenght of a collective, its best to pick one and go with it

This is the new Qtard divine intervention cope. You've been psyopped

>replace it with a system of worker-ownership
No need to jerk off to commie stuff. Let businesses figure that out on their own

Any ideology centered around strong personalities rather than strong systems is doomed to failure.

It just seems silly and outdated for (((people who already have the most money))) to profit the most off of the hard work of others. I supposed worker ownership is communist in the theoretical sense, but not in the practical way communism has been implemented.

I'm sure boomers is on the way down by now with them starting to die in mass.

the strong systems are entirely dependent on the personalities to maintain them, it will devolve to that point inherently, might as well get in early with the personalities

Time, idiot. Read the chart.

You're wrong. Cultures transcend individuals, and if you have a culture of fairness, honesty, and integrity, your society has a much better chance at long term success than those that don't. People are products of their environment.

Many Millenials are reaping what they sowed. Sure, there's many who are in honest dire straits trying their best and actually fucking working, and we should think about how to help them, but if you coasted through your twenties playing vidya or riding the cock carousel and now you're a dog walker or DJ or some bullshit, you deserve everything you fucking got.

to expand, take the example i gave of the US, nice decentralized government, what happened? the elected officials and judges all decided to interpret the rules in a different way and the people didnt stop them and now we are where we are now, we cant go back and write rules and say ok dont break them, we already know what happens, they get broken, might as well go full tilt and try to get a strongman whose generally agreeable

This.
wtfhappenedin1971.com/
Castillo effects and the regressive tax known as inflation.

Kill all jews

>just seems silly and outdated for (((people who already have the most money))) to profit the most off of the hard work of others
Sure, but they generally are the ones taking all the risk. Why should they lose ownership once they get it off the ground

Cantillon effects.

>if you have a culture of fairness, honesty, and integrity

we dont and we never will again, thats the problem, we've been on a decline since the times of hobbes and whatever and the age of classical liberalism, and we've been declining because those ideologies dont maintain control over their people and nations, they simply trust men not to be shit but men are shit

Seize the means of boomer assets.

If Commies ran on a platform of that I’d vote for them every time

genocide the poors. dan pena had a great take on this that i'm too lazy to find.

put an end to interest and loans, or as Any Forums likes to say "end all usury."

>4% rise in a decade
so millennials will be up to 25% of the total wealth by the time they're in their 80s
>nice decentralized government
the very founding of the country was rife with arguments about how powerful the federal government should be, and the federalists won within a decade. You have a tenuous grasp of history.
maybe, but there would still be angloids and arabs
because that kind of system leads to consolidation of resources in the hands of a relatively small group of people. by funding business startups through credit unions, the risk is distributed among the people who keep their money in that credit union, and so are the rewards, and that reward isn't in perpetuity - just until the initial investment is paid back.
Men can be shit. I suppose I'm just more optimistic about the potential of the species than you are.
Low-interest loans are fine. It's the high-interest predatory loans that are usury, but our usury laws are way too generous to the lenders. It should be capped at 2%

There's nothing wrong with loans that aren't fractional reserve

>because that kind of system leads to consolidation of resources in the hands of a relatively small group of people
Successful people will always rise to the top. And theyll want to expand

Disagree on this as well. Local credit unions operating within a fractional reserve system can greatly benefit the economy for the reasons I outlined above. The problem is when everyone's money is concentrated within a few giant banks.

Nigga we've been at 0% reserve requirements since March 2020....we're well past fractional. They literally take your bank deposits and loan them immediately. These fucks aren't producing anything and making money hand over fist with a literal Ponzi scheme that our entire market is predicated on. The solution to this is evil is the same as any other evil

Look at where that kind of thinking has led us. For 40,000 years of behaviorally modern human history, we bashed in the skulls of anyone who tried to proclaim himself kind over other men. Archaeological evidence proves this.

king*

>Local credit unions operating within a fractional reserve system can greatly benefit the economy for the reasons
Now we have to fight. Fractional reserve lending is the same kikery as the fed printing money

You're a retard