Satan worshipping should not be protected by the First Amendment

Satan worshipping should not be protected by the First Amendment

Attached: as2723lclih81.jpg (828x580, 51.39K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=9tCFgoAgdsE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Anything else?

>360949381
Neither is kike zionist supremacy and tyranny, babysitting niggers, being swamped by minorities, or pandering to rampant homosexuals and the mentally ill, but here we are.

It most definitely should be, land of the free BITCH

>checked
/thread

Satanists don't actually believe in satanism, they're just edgy youths wanting to get a rise out of christcucks in retaliation for fucking up their childhood.
Free speech means free speech for all retard

Actually the founders were freemasons.

Freemasons weren't always pozzed and kiked.

Christianity shouldn’t be protected by the first amendment. Jew worship is not what the founders had in mind when they referenced the “fruits of liberty.”

youtube.com/watch?v=9tCFgoAgdsE

As long as Charlie Kirk is on of the „brightest“ spokes persons of the young conservatives, I cannot take them seriously. This guy cannot debate and lead a logical debate.

If you had some young guy with the capabilities of Thomas Sowell, it would a whole different USA

the whole point of the first amendment is that not tyrannical nigger has the power to decide what speech is protected and what isn't. it's ALL protected

my freedom ends where I intervene with other's freedom
Satan literally means "evil", why would someone follow a religion meaning 'evilism"?
1- They are edgy fucks with no respect
2- They are literally evil
3- They are idiots

All of these three types of people are dangerous to society and will attack others' freedoms

Freedom of speech but not freedom of consequences :^)

Attached: 1639607331692.png (717x888, 460.07K)

it's only been pozzed for 300 years? or do you mean the founders were based and it's only been pozzed recently? freemasons literally made laws in south america prohibiting racially homogeneous marriages.

this sentence always reminds me of the Turkish political joke:
"we have freedom of speech in Turkey, until you speak" (düşünce özgürlüğü var ama ifade edemezsin!)
Sounds so dystopic

This GOP, through people like shapiro, kirk, matt walsh and perhaps nick fuentes, are trying to take control of any genuine opposition to liberalism by parroting their rhetoric, ciphoning popularity away from the organic personslities, and eventually will try to either absorb them into the GOP plantation or "de-radicalize" them.

It is entirely cynical. These people are empty suits that just want to make opposition controlled again.

That nobody is totally wrong. No wonder the alt-right is losing support.

The old america was a land for white men. And no, Italians etc were not considered white.

The old america would have never become a subservient cuck nation. Only with mass immigration and mass immigration of jews and the women‘s right to vote, they could turn america with the appeal to virtues into this shithole aus USrael.

The american cititen does not exist anymore. You only have residents.

One better just get rid of that stupid, wussy commie constitution and either go back to the Articles of Confederation or come up with something better and more concrete. The US Constitution was always vague lawyer speak meant to be manipulated to serve government purposes. Do people not realize or want to admit how absurd and impossible nonsense like for example, the 6th amendment is?

Attached: 1stJewPuppt.jpg (300x300, 9.73K)

free masons have always advocated for those things

Fuck off roach

Attached: images (1).jpg (300x168, 6.17K)

>muh satan
Picking his battles wisely I see. I’m sure he’d extend the first amendment to encompass drag queen story hour and hardcore pornography.

Not my problem

All antisocial behavior should be illegal. Including troons, fags, and junkies. Conversely, if I have fulfilled all my responsibilities to my community I should be legally allowed to relax with an 8ball and some whisky.

This is a segue into saying that the First Amendment does not allow anti-Semitic speech.

Charlie Kirk's only job is to prevent conservatives from discovering the JQ.

No one with a brain cares what Charlie "Israel before America" Kike has to say. Motherfucker looks inbred.

The purpose of religious freedom was to protect masons and other secret societies.

Our Satan who art in Hades, hellowed be thy name.
Why not?

>and will attack others' freedoms
And you can respond accordingly if and when they do that
What is is with subhumans and immediately jumping to thoughtcrime?

We really need a right-wing group to troll these Satanists and atheists back. Imagine some free speech group demanding to put up a statue of Mohammed next to those baphomet satanic statues. Either that shit would get shut down fast, or some muzzie would bomb it or you could use the fuck out of the gov.

I don't understand, all I need to do is turn on CNN to see that.

*sue

wow great take
his organization still pushes open borders, trannies, faggots and jews

Attached: noam-chomsky-800px.jpg (800x435, 58.98K)

Satan worshipping is on another level of faggotry, but if that becomes a thing, who is to say that likes won’t push the whole second amendment/flintlock argument even further. It sucks, and you may not agree, but if we want to preserve as much of our freedoms and rights as we can. Cant do anything but defend the right to do so :/

Nah jk lol fuck them all, hang them all, shoot em all. Satanist, faggots, kikes, niggers, all of them

By worshipping Satan they are effectively saying, "I am evil, I worship evil, and my works will be for evil". So I have no problems denying them the right to anything honestly.

Attached: 1618458027535.jpg (3759x2236, 3.88M)

founders were masons but his first sentence was good

Attached: 2D084382-9004-4984-AB94-05830FCA3035.jpg (500x446, 29.38K)