History is fake

There’s some Russians who wrote a huge volume set arguing that most of history can be condensed to 2000 years and everything else didn’t happen, and that it starts over and that’s why the stories we’ve passed down sound similar but have different names. Tracy Twyman was researching this, along with sun killing rituals and ended up committing suicide

Attached: 789D8CBB-1F76-4E34-9C02-CFE535A2C343.jpg (880x1360, 64.66K)

Not the same thing, Dinosaurs were reptiles, they don't have as much baggy soft tissue all over the place to make them look bloated like a hippo. pic related, you can clearly see which animal this was.

Attached: asd.jpg (1000x636, 64.06K)

post elephant skull ones

if you could determine it's habitat like hippos being water dwellers and their primary foodsource you would determine that it has a high bodyfat and thick skin with large muscles covering it's bones

Attached: 1638550578741.jpg (668x501, 60.45K)

You have prior knowledge of other existing animals and know what shapes on bones attach to what and how. Lower teeth that come out inward from the upper teeth are rarely fully exposed since that would be fairly useless, so they're likely covered by soft tissue. Hooks on bones are similarly not usually exposed but act as attachment points for tendons. A big one like that on a jaw will be for attaching a large tendon for a strong muscle.

Exactly

The single picture that btfos science tards forever

hippos are fucking dangerous that 2nd image might as well be the real thing

Do they have any predator at all ? Even for humans it's not easy to dispatch one of those niggers and you'd need military equipment for a large group.

Dinosaurs were just birds.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 108.34K)

I thought they are saying they were birds now and not reptiles?

No one cant pin point literally any of that, in speaking g of fat content, skin thickness, color, skin type, the type of food eaten, tissue like cartilage. That's the point OPS image is proving. If everyone were to take 3 seconds to think on any of what I said, no one would believe the "recreations" of dinosaurs were shown which are derived from 1 or 2 bones (or fragments)/fossils.

Wtf?

Anatoly Fomenko put out some books outlining his New Chronology. History: Fact or Science. He basically argues that many of the historical empires and places were actually the same events. I don’t buy into it, but it is a fascinating read.

dinosaurs were not reptiles

I know that the holocaust is a lie dude but this is a mcdonalds.

Theres about 200 years of history missing between 1500 and the 1900's

Attached: 1664961.jpg (1024x682, 212.38K)

No, maybe a pack of 5+ lions if they get lucky and find an old hippo, outside of that hell no. Those things will crush your head like a piece of candy.

>No one cant pin point literally any of that
literally every biologist can determine all of that from various things, like is it a mammal and what kind of teeth it has pointing to food sources, also carbon dating it gives you an idea what other animals lived at the same time and what kinds of climates it had to live in

Were they people? Some had higher IQ's than gorillas and gorillas are more human than niggers, therefore would dinosaurs have been compatible in White society? Also, why do kikes deny dragons when dinosaurs just so happen to greatly resemble them? Lynch all kikes two times.

Who knew dinosaurs were so heckin' cute and valid?

Attached: 1638896148882.gif (320x392, 2.32M)

Most of paleontology and evolutionary psychology are bullshit.

Nothing a .300 WSM loaded with 220gr Nosler AccuBonds can't handle.

Attached: .300 WSM.jpg (640x1000, 15.4K)

correction, birds are literally dinosaurs

Nah, they can't get through the skin.

Yeh, I'm sure Jamal the new biologist and Natalie the roastie will have everything figured out HAHAHA

Thats not the point tho is it?