THE GREAT NATSOC GENERAL卐 SS galicia division edition It's that time again! Time for the eternal NatSoc General!
EVERY DAY, EVERY NIGHT IT IS YOUR DUTY TO KEEP THIS GENERAL ALIVE. GIVE A BUMP!
Thread for discussion of National Socialism, Fascism, Rexism, Falangism, the Third Position and Racial Identity Movements. Traditionalism in art and society can also be discussed. Share links, PDFs, reading, videos, and propaganda.
In addition, the thread is also dedicated to self-improvement in the physical and the mental realm as well as practical skills and general life advice.
> RULES OF ENGAGEMENT: > 卐 - DO NOT REPLY TO DIVIDERS, GATEKEEPERS, MEMEFLAGS, NO-TRUE-SCOTSMEN AND SPREADERS OF MISINFORMATION! - 卐 > 卐 - DO NOT NEEDLESSLY HARASS OTHER NATIONAL SOCIALISTS- 卐 > 卐 - PEOPLE DOING UNWANTED IMAGE-DUMPS OR SPAMMING ARE TO BE CONSIDERED SHILLS - 卐
Always remember to be respectful towards fellow National Socialists
>Runners were usually low-ranking non-commissioned officers, such as corporals, who were chosen for their fitness, stamina and ability to read maps, Cart explains. They also had to be tough and resourceful enough to find their destination in any sort of weather, and sufficiently lithe and agile to navigate obstacles. As they ventured beyond their unit’s position, they faced the risk of being shot or blown up before they got there, or on the way back.
>Of all the jobs in the infantry, “the runner’s job was the hardest and most dangerous,” World War I veteran Lt. Allan L. Dexter observed in a 1931 newspaper article. “With a runner, it was merely a question of how long he would last before being wounded or killed.”
>Those who volunteered for the job of runner were regarded with great respect by others who served. As Elton Mackin wrote in his memoir Suddenly We Didn’t Want to Die: Memoirs of a World War I Marine, “A fellow didn’t have to take a runner’s job. All a fellow had to do was say no. Except in a pinch, when there was neither time nor choice, no one served as a runner except a volunteer, for many vital things depended upon the men carrying the messages.”
Redpilled bulgarian: Whenever you make a good thread that really strikes deep into their insecurities, they will not attempt to argue because they just cannot and will be used for ridicule in the same thread What they do instead is they pull any criticism at all that they can think of to discredit you without explicitly carrying the baggage of them admitting that they're leftists or shills. They just blend in and critique you without much sense. This is called, quite literally, Critical Theory. It is the main weapon of the modern progressive's arsenal. Critical theory says that you critique the thing without trying to engage it on an equal stage where it can argue, and by critiquing and ridiculing it without much sense you'd plant the seed of doubt within its supporters and make them question it.
This is implemented right now as I'm speaking in America. The US curriculum now has a mandatory Critical Race Theory ingrained within it. Critical Race Theory stands for what I wrote above, except that the target is specifically white people. It critiques the whites, without allowing them to defend themselves because you do not defend yourself from something that your teacher is told to read in front of the class, with the sole purpose of shaking up inter-racial support within white groups so as to weaken them.
In fact this Critical Theory tactic can be seen everywhere with a leftist presence. Have you noticed how every single eceleb or a right wing politician here is mocked and critiqued, sometimes for very cartoonish reasons? Yeah, you're not immune to this either. However let me tell you a little secret. Critical Theory isn't immune from itself too. This is what they're all scared of, the few of us who realize that the entirety of postmodernism can be inverted and turned on itself with a critique so vicious that it will only lead to a Hitler on steroids. What you're doing in this thread - pointing the jew out - is literally critical theory too. This scares them a lot.
I love the quote in your pic, we should all be peaceful but be ready to be called up to take up arms and defend our people once being peaceful is not longer an option. We should want to be peaceful and we would want the transition to a National Socialist state to be peaceful, a peaceful transition to a National Socialist state is ideal but if we have to be violent to set up a state that will defend us we should be violent when necessary.
Lucas Brown
>National Socialist state is ideal but if we have to be violent to set up a state that will defend us we should be violent when necessary.
And that is the reason why i also like that quote When you are not willing to fight for your ideas when necceseary then you do not deserve to be the man of peace because peace is made and maitained by conflict. Also Serrano whitepill brain worm inbound because why not
