How can we hope to win when we are exclusionary and the left is inclusive? Fulfilling our ideology creates enemies for us and allies for the left. Are we not weakening our own position? Can't it be about culture, which is both adaptable and relevant to our lives, instead of immutable identitarian labels? Redpill me on purity spiralling.
>inb4 we should hate x people because they are y
Will it matter if we fucking lose?
The biggest advantage the left has is that it has a place it wants to go. Many may hate that place. But they are at least saying 'we want to change the world to X' and they have a goal.
Conservatives are usually only able to articulate that they don't want thing to happen. That defensive posture is always going to lose in the long run.
The right has far more advantages imo
>The left is inclusive
lmao what
The fact remains that we are losing, rapidly and consistently
The left is mostly women. This is a fact that is too often overlooked. Once the bullets start flying, they will collapse like a house of cards.
Any person can be accepted by the left by conforming to their morals, even a former right winger. We push away potential allies for phenotypes they didn't choose and can't change, and the only place for them to go is into the hands of globohomo.
We win by maintaining coherence and not allowing ourselves to be distracted from our primary goals. The left will never truly win the war because they're so inclusive to the point that they both lack coherence, they're trying to do too many things at once, and they're easily infiltrated by bad actors.
It's pretty clear if you pay attention that all of the problems leftists have is that trannies and SJWs keep pulling focus away from what SHOULD be their main goals: implementing socalist policies in government. If they could focus all of the movement's efforts toward those goals, they would succeed. Instead, there's constant infighting and cancelling, and discussions of bullshit like trans rights, nigger rights, etc. are brought to the forefront, when they should be secondary or even tertiary to their primary goal.
Seriously, if leftists just said "fuck trannies, fuck BLM, fuck SJWs" they would win. But they'll never do that.
yes but the right fractured along 2 lines. One towards libertarian right the other is more authoritarian. While the left may say that they are libertarian socialist or whatever but in reality all of them are authoritarian.
You're not though. Your side has more firepower, more high earners, and more reproduction.
This is already happening, I see so many progressive girls dating nationalist type men now that the future seems increasingly unsafe. In a full blown civil war they'd defect to the other side with veterans/preppers/gymbros etc. instantly. It makes me worried we're going to lose them in droves soon.
That wouldn't help us win at all, strategies that appeal to Any Forums don't appeal to leftists let alone the general public
Because if you include all, you cannot trust people. Teamwork is thus reliant om trust creating institutions the right creates. CHAZ/CHOP is what happens when they are outside of these, they get robbed, raped and killed. Why just the leftie rail against these? He wishes to mug himself. Terminal lefties past 35 are the scum of the earth.
And when will that be? Trump was our big shot and we let him slip away without so much as a shot fired. The way things are going, we will never again have that much control over the nation's resources. The cultural foundation has eroded away, and we need to find a way to turn the tides. We need to start becoming stronger instead of weaker, and that means making sacrifices.
no, kill yourself kike
>You're not though. Your side has more firepower, more high earners, and more reproduction.
I agree that we should be stronger, but the left consistently achieves their political aims and we consistently do not. They have almost completely consolidated political power and they show no signs of slowing down. We don't have a single powerful politician who is willing to even name the enemy.
>In a full blown civil war they'd defect to the other side with veterans/preppers/gymbros etc. instantly.
Even the people you consider "nationalist-type" are mostly vaxxmaxxed npcs who worship rap, sports, drugs, and finance. They won't fight for us. Not when we are so badly lacking institutional power and resources.
I think the lefts camp is smaller than its ever been.
Black pilled kike get out side and touch grass
groups have to be exclusive to be successful. The left has no meaningful way from discriminating against bad actors and free loaders, and the ideological differences within all their disparate members will ALWAYS lead to infighting
>The Left
>Inclusive
LOL. Many other places on the internet ban people like us. So people like us come to places like this with the rest of the Outcasts. There are many of us lets not pretend there isn't
>exclusionary vs inclusive
both sides are both of these things. it's basically critically thinking white men vs everyone else at this point
We are not exclusionary, we are Exclusive. We are Above them. They are not inclusive, inclusive is just a word for them not having standards or morals. We are a higher class than them because we are right which means Righteous & they are leftist which means left handed path of Satan.
Because their inclusivity includes giving exclusive providence over their agency to fools.
All their movements need to be headed by a smorgasboard of undesirables, such as trannies and blacks who are some combination of off putting, neurotic and incompetent, else be accused of illegitamacy with the movement.
We should not be looking to "win", we should reasonably be looking to seperate ourselves from these freaks. What do we even "win" anchoring ourselves to people who believe in an inverted hierarchy of competence?
Why exactly are two groups with vastly different priorities obligated to exist in the same system? Worded correctly I believe both sides could be sold on the issue, once it's established that we aren't going to be educated into obedience by idiotic dogmatics who are probably dumber than us because they got a worthless education themselves seemingly on the belief that education is merited by divine providence and valuable in and of itself regardless of content. If such a system worked they would not exist, they or their forebears would be products of the dogmatic education that they rebelled against.
Ultimately the left can't exactly handle success because they harbor a diverse crew of peoples connected only by a common enemy in an alliance of convenience. Once that enemy wanes in influence there's no actual common ethos between them, and they will eat each other over the direction of the movement.
By reproducing.
when things get so dire, walking out into the street with a rifle seems like a GOOD idea. Clearly we are a long way away from that.