What is the most successful government type?

Heroism.

In modern terms, that means benevolent authoritarianism by the greatest among a people.

The most successful civilizations in history succeeded because they were led by Heroes of their people, that did everything in the best interest of his people. Exceptional individuals have always pushed the boundaries of their society's achievements, and left glorious legacies, loved and immortalized by their faithful fellow citizens.

Greece.
Egypt.
Rome.
Christendom.
The British Empire.
Napoleon.
Hitler.
Genghis Khan.
Muhammad.
The Founding Fathers.
Edo Japan.
Persia.
Vedic India.
Vikings.
Conquistadores.
Knights.

Great men shape the world, defeat evil, and create prosperity for their people, building monuments that stand for thousands of years as proof of their achievements.

Attached: roman_pepe.jpg (1000x861, 481.85K)

Other urls found in this thread:

livius.org/sources/content/augustus-res-gestae/
reuters.com/article/oukoe-uk-britain-tutankhamun-dna/half-of-european-men-share-king-tuts-dna-idUKTRE7704OR20110801
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futarchy
mason.gmu.edu/~rhanson/futarchy.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>successful
>benevolent
>government
Pick one.

Attached: eyerollpepe.png (514x496, 148.51K)

>Heroism.
>In modern terms, that means benevolent authoritarianism by the greatest among a people.
You've lost 95% of your readers by here because you're too vague

>Napoleon
He was beaten by a spanish woman.

Attached: 1628552923913.jpg (2497x3329, 627.5K)

Is there a "leave me the fuck alone" government type?

And to be more exact, 2 women.

Attached: 1622120927778.jpg (753x900, 131.68K)

Anarcho-monarchist-fascism with meth head tendencies.

Attached: best dog.webm (360x360, 2.74M)

>my method of stealing your money for your own good is better than yours

>Rome
Pick All.

Attached: augustus-caesar.jpg (1200x840, 113.55K)

you wouldn't hate government that actually advocated and benefited you.
Government and tyranny are not synonymous, it's just that they are today because the one world government is run by jewish satanic psychopaths.

Power does not corrupt. Your parents had absolute power over you, yet they loved you and did what's best for you.

Fair point.

READ, NIGGA!

livius.org/sources/content/augustus-res-gestae/

Attached: the-consummation-of-empire-thomas-cole.png (1023x562, 668.45K)

Sounds like an excuse for some jewish attention whore to stage nonsense and become "the hero".

>Not all Heroes wear capes
>Only the Autistic ones do

Attached: superpower.png (453x464, 210.4K)

Enlighten dictatorship

Rome was based as fuck. You got a loli wife and pieces of land for military service. In America you get divorced and made homeless for military service.

one that is ruled by members of your own race that have thier futures invested in the country ie a monarchy

The stories you tell matter more than the facts, so you’re onto something. You guys make fun of nogs we wuzzing but if you repeat something enough it becomes true. Maybe right wingers are the ones who need to we wuz more

monarchy implies divine right to rule, which is nonsense.

If God truly ought you rule, your achievements would merit that right. The King does not need to repeatedly say he is King.

reuters.com/article/oukoe-uk-britain-tutankhamun-dna/half-of-european-men-share-king-tuts-dna-idUKTRE7704OR20110801

Attached: We Were Kings.jpg (214x236, 13.52K)

Greece had Monarchy, Feudarchy, Direct Democracy, Oligarchy, and expanded on systems of Anarchy, Tyranny, and mercantile capitalism as well as communism.


Which one frogposting retard? Which of is representative of greece?

elections always lead too people who are bought and paid for, a monarch owns everything as far as he can see. he can't be bought. a warlord/dictator is ever challenged by those who think they can beat him monarchs are the most stable option that keeps the ruler invested in improving the nation whether or not a almighty god has put him in charge

The most successful government was the Mughal empire ruled under Shah Jahan. His reign was the most prosperous period in history.

Attached: main-image.jpg (810x1200, 202.25K)

The system doesn't matter, all that matters is the moral character and competence of the leaders.

Ancient Greece was great because its leaders were great.

Attached: Laocoön-scaled.jpg (2560x1534, 383.48K)

You forgot mauryan India

Attached: Mauryans.png (500x491, 136.38K)

>Shah Jahan
>not even close to Guptas
>pushed the empire into poverty by spending money on marble mausoleum for his dead wife
Literal retardness ,both he and his son.

>british empire

>good

was good in the 1800s.

better off under turks.

A leader that shrinks from challenge under any pretext is weak and deceptive. Whether by oratory or combat, the leader should be absolute in their conquest.

Rome had would-be usurpers, and they were just opportunities to provide Heroes with legendary conquests and proof of authority.

Futarchy might be the best form of government that hasn't been tried yet. The basic idea is to use prediction markets to make political decisions, and to vote on values, but bet on beliefs.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futarchy
mason.gmu.edu/~rhanson/futarchy.html

Attached: it's all signalling.jpg (960x540, 87.25K)

india was white.

eugenics should be needed for you niggers.