Where would you go?

Nowhere, since the USA will launch hundreds of nukes and destroy everything else in response, you may as well pull out a lawn chair and enjoy the big show in real-time.

checked and true for most if not all of us living in those areas. Sucks but I guess it was not meant to be.

Attached: E4_9V1aXEAQwfy0.jpg (852x738, 55.21K)

>wants to come to the country
>isnt let in
>this country is terrible
Are you a woman?

Even if you have a lot of money on your credit card the immigration officer may refuse you a visa due to the lack of an official job. That's the point, retard
Isn't there a risk of being killed by drug cartels or shot by border guards? I really don't know how dangerous it is so I won't try it for a tourist trip.

Walk in from Mexico, fuckwit. All the niggers are doing it.

>money on your credit card
The purpose of a credit card is to spend money you don’t have, retard

You will have just about enough time to make a bowl of popcorn and make it to the roof for the show.

>No major wildfires in Colorado
Map is inaccurate. Colorado forests at that altitude are almost 100% ponderosa pine which are so full of resin they explode in wildfires.

Fallout breaksdown pretty quickly. Last 100 days and you are fine.

Attached: Nuclear Radiation 100 days.png (1142x588, 549.86K)

as long as Houston gets nuked it will be all worth it

The real issue is ash & rain. Ash & water make lye, which is really acidic. Soils would take a couple years to recover and damage to buildings from this acidic washout would reduce the lifespan of buildings that are affected by it considerable, particularly in their foundations

We have anti-missile systems that will take out any thing Russia launches.

Besides, Russians are terrible engineers, just look at their lethal space program for all you need to know about that. Their nukes have already killed more Russians than anybody else on the planet and that's not likely to change. Plus Moscow is the most vulnerable nuclear target of all, with more of the country's wealth, military command and population than anywhere else. It would be literal mass-suicide for Putin to consider a first strike.

Attached: nukemap Moscow.png (1405x960, 683.38K)

Houston port is a tier one target.

That was supposed to scare Trump into believing Mar-A Lago was a target.

Moscow is a psyop. It might not even exist

Yes, but the part of the money that exceeds the limit is yours. Don't teach me financial literacy, dumb faggot

According to this map I'm good, but some of these targets are really questionable to me. Who gives a fuck about Farmington New Mexico? What makes Grand junction a bigger target than other small cities of comparable or even larger size?

Attached: more-than-half-of-united-states-counties-were-smaller-in-2020-than-in-2010-figure-1.jpg (1864x1372, 483.65K)

The model makes a distinction between civilian, military, and infrastructure targets as denoted by the color-coding scheme.

>California will be completely devastated no matter what

Attached: 1638937771522.png (657x527, 148.45K)

...you are not financially literate, that is not how a credit card works
Also how the fuck is it difficult to go to America as a tourist? Just get an ESTA. Unless of course you're from a shithole, in which case they're making it very clear you're not welcome

house up in northern Maine, that is if Nukes were real

I know that. What I'm asking is what makes some of these civilian targets more important than others. Like are Rapid City and Eugene so important that you would sacrifice a nuke for there instead of Odessa and Lubbock or Sioux Falls (much larger areas by population)?

Attached: Home_Prices_by_County.png (1255x931, 311.91K)