How is it that we were able to use a nuclear bomb to devastate Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but in Chernobyl and Fukushima, which were much smaller explosions and fires, have rendered the areas completely useless and uninhabitable?
The nuclear fuel for Hiroshima and Nagasaki were consumed in the explosion. I don't know about Chernobyl but the fuel rods are still at Fukushima. There's your problem.
Oliver Johnson
The first bombs weren't that powerful.
Dylan Richardson
>Baby's first redpill
Atomic bombs aren't real, faggot. It's a deep rabbit hole.
Adrian Hall
The bombs were detonated way up in the sky which affects the amount of radiation dispersed at ground level. Also there is a lot more nuclear material in a power plant than in a nuclear bomb
Ian Watson
Chernobyl's elephant foot is still burning, but the land around it is just fine. Wildlife is flourishing there with no problem. I don't know as much about Fukushima, but I do know that the reason you think both these sites are lost forever is because (((they))) hate nuclear energy and need the cattle to fear it. Nuclear energy is the safest, cleanest, most efficient we as a species has ever developed and it's being shoved into the dirt because it means less money for oil tycoons. It's as simple as that. They prevent new power plants from being erected by abusing bureaucracy. The legal and permit fees cost MORE than the infrastructure itself. Human progression, real progression not globohomo progression, is being stunted in real time because of greedy kikes. Holy shit I hate them so much
Tyler Hernandez
scifi
Liam Baker
OK if that's the case then why were some people experiencing radiation poisoning after the explosion? Is the ground then irradiated for some time afterwards?
Does this also mean that there are parts of the US that are irradiated from nuclear testing as well?
Nicholas Cooper
Basically: - A nuclear bomb is a single, large "fuck you" all at once. - Chernobyl (and by extension Fukushima to a point) are more like a seemingly endless stream of smaller "fuck yous".
You can't make a conventional nuclear reactor turn into a devastating bomb by just overworking it. The most you can do is make some internal mechanics wear out and stop functioning, and then you're just left with a very undramatic dead reactor.
Nuclear bombs expend the fuel but leave behind weker radioactive substances but that cann still gove major radiation sickness In Chjernobyl bits and peices of reactor core in bost dust and solid form got thrown up into the atmosphere Chjernobly was less forceful so it landed in a kuch more concentrated manner while a nuke (especially those that detonate above the grounf and not ground impact) blast their byproducts in a diliteing manner
Julian Garcia
Can you post some sources? I never heard that before
Joshua Hall
They firebombed hiroshima and nagasaki. It's history's little dirty secret. Also there's no such thing as nuclear bombs.
Owen Howard
Retarded nigger doesn't know how a nuclear bomb works
Caleb Long
So are there still fuck yous happening at both sites? So Chernobyl's issue was that it was dispersed into the atmosphere and still essentially "raw fuel" (if you will) and I'm assuming then spread outwards leaving raw material to irradiate the land in the area?
Anthony Ramirez
>pirate flag kek
Jordan Watson
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were uninhabitable for a while after the bombings, but those were relatively low yield airbursts, so they wouldn't do much long-term irradiating. Chernobyl and Fukushima were more like dirty bombs than nukes; the explosive yield wasn't much (as far as nuclear-related weapons go), but they spat out tons of radiation, in part because irradiated areas on fire generated fallout. Ground bursts produce much more fallout than airbursts for that reason, the irradiated fires.
You also have to realize that these are relatively recent events. Chernobyl was 36 years ago, and, IIRC, the area is safer for humans now than it was ten years ago, so give it ten more years, idk. Fukushima was only just 11 years ago, so give it some time.
The real question is why those two isolated, preventable disasters are always used to hold back nuclear energy, which is the safest, cleanest, and most efficient energy source there is.
Jaxson Allen
Wait until Any Forums researches Mohenjo-Daro then suddenly realises why India has so many genetic mutations
>Is the ground then irradiated for some time afterwards? Yes. Rainwater dilutes this over time.
Parker Bell
Allen Dulles - Freemason Isidor Rabi- Jew Roosevelt - Freemason Douglass McCarthur - Freemason George Marshall - Freemason George Purdy - Freemason Julius Schaefer - Freemason Truman - Freemason Eugene Wigner - Jew Emilio G. Segrè - jew Otto R. Frisch - jew Victor F. Weisskopf - jew Einstein - Jew Melvin Bierman - Jew Jacob Beser - Jew James Franck - Jew Rudolf Pieriels - Jew Klaus Fuchs - Jew Joseph Rotblat - Jew Stanislaw Ulam - Jew Chaim Richman - Jew Bruno Rossi - Jew Nora Rossi - Jew George Gamow - Jew Hans Bethe - Jew George Placzek - Jew Jay Wechsler - jew Richard P. Feynman - jew Robert Serber - jew Stanley P. Frankel - jew Isadore Perlman - jew Alvin M. Weinberg- jew Abe Spitzer - jew George Cohen - jew David Bohm- jew Phillip Morrison - jew Frank Oppenheimer - jew Aaron Novick - jew Arnold Kramish - jew Arthur Levy - jew Maurice Shapiro - Jew (likely freemason) Paul Olum - jew Theodore Van Kirk - Freemason Szilard - Jew Oppenheimer - Jew Baruch - Jew Stimson - Skull and Bones Harriman - Skull and Bones Vannevar Bush - Freemason Norman Foster Jr. Thomas Allibone - Freemason Enrico Fermi - Freemason William M. Ryan George Seaborg - Bohemian Grove (likely freemason) Ernest Orlando LAWRENCE- Bohemian Grove > Congrats you fell for another Judeo-Masonic hoax.
If it was firebombed Japanese eye witness accounts would obviously mention hundreds of planes in the sky. No way it could've stay a secret for nearly 80 years, with the modern internet being here for over 15. This whole theory is retarded
Aaron Allen
> Nuclear bombs expend the fuel but leave behind weker radioactive substances but that cann still gove major radiation sickness (((They))) allege just 1% of the Uranium in the bomb was fissioned during the reaction. Therefore there should still be plenty of radioactive fallout scattered around the city ruins.
>So are there still fuck yous happening at both sites? It's a matter of scale. For one, chernobyl had a shitton more uranium onsite when it blew. For another, nuclear bombs are designed to maximize reactivity at the moment of detonation, while reactors are designed to drag that process out to keep things stable.
It's a bit like comparing a leaky car exhaust to a fuel-air bomb.
Luis Anderson
That's so retarded
Daniel Jones
I dont know shit but one night in Vegas the sky lit up bright as day. Swear to lawd.
Mason Walker
>Fukushima How is Fukushima nowadays? There should be drone footage showing how good/bad it is.
Sebastian Hernandez
Nigger we have ionosphere measurements pre and post bombs going off imagine being this much of a knuckle dragging pavement ape.
bro. a shit lod of people never left the hot zone in chernobyl. chernobyl is currently one of the best places for wildlife because humans leave them the fuck alone. yeah man. lets move to chernobyl, its actually not even bad.
Anthony Martin
I watched something recently where James May visits it and there are still brand new cars at car dealerships there. Everything has been abandoned and it's just kind of sitting there.
Jacob Perry
> No way it could've stay a secret for nearly 80 years, with the modern internet being here for over 15. Its by no means a secret to anybody who has looked into it critically.