Protestants cannot refute this

Also, how do Catholics deny the plenary inspiration of scripture?
youtu.be/WKHdyhmolMw

Attached: Church.png (1200x627, 441.16K)

Attached: 1644248148309-pol.png (506x516, 28.87K)

>scripture followed for 2000 years is just some textbook
reddit spacing kikes, I swear.

Attached: 1644248337892-pol.jpg (637x621, 296.94K)

The thread is about sola scriptura you fucking sperg. Go start your own thread if you want to discuss another topic. We don't have to change the subject just because you're an annoying autist who's demanding that we do.

...and you're going to explain your position when? In an hour? A day? A week?
Or do you expect us to accept what you're saying at face value?

We can agree on this.

You know this a board about politics not religion. Post your religious threads somewhere else!

>this is my body
>this is my blood
>"huh, what does that mean"
>unless you eat my flesh and drink my blood you have no life within you
at this point, EVERYONE following Jesus except the 12 starts leaving, because they interpreted it as literal
did Jesus say "no no guys! this is just a parable! its not literal haha!"
no, He turned to the only people who stayed and said
>are you going to go away too?
HE MADE HIMSELF CLEAR
REPENT

Attached: 1596488513472.png (960x540, 620.6K)

>y...you cant use reason and tradition!! you can only use scripture
>heh, foolish Catholic, you'd think I'd just read scripture on the matter of the Eucharist? well get this, im gonna use reasoning and (my own) tradition instead!
the eternal prody

>is canon known through tradition
No.
>Yes it is.
No it isn't. Most Christian "traditions" are stolen directly from paganism and the papacy admits this. The tradition of Catholicism and by extension Protestant Christianity is almost fully Babylonian, and not canon in the bible. In fact the bible mentions and condemns these traditions, like decorating a tree for Christmas.
You flowchart is wrong and stupid and you should feel bad for being wrong and stupid.

Are you going to explain your claim? That the canon not being authoritative somehow applies to the Bible also?

Look. You and I both know this thread will be much more fun as a shitflinging contest than some stupid nonsense about old Jewish books.

>>is canon known through tradition
>No.
the canon was set at the Council of Rome (382)
if you do not think that cannon is authoritative, then "the content of the Bible itself is now up for grabs" and there is nothing that can be deemed "Scripture" because every man carries the same authority to determine what is and isn't Scripture

>be convert
>dont understand any of this crap
>just know catholicism is the /fa/ choice
why do christians fight over minor autistic details? i'm sure god prefers you fight the synagogue of satan rather than your brother

The Bible was just written by humans anyway, just like all other scripture.
Anyone could say that their book is the word of God.

Yes. And Yahweh isn't God.

It was pretty big details back in the time when Martin Luther lived.

Since you are such a fan of tradition, why do you deny the tradition of the Greek used to write the New Testament?

The eucharist is a metaphor, as clearly illustrated by the structure of the Greek, as described in the meme you did not read.

Attached: 1644247755432-pol.jpg (1098x1218, 205.32K)

>catholics get their own waifu fig

I dont go to a church where pastors wear dresses and jewelry. If I wanted to see that I could just go to a gay bar instead.

For you, probably.
The rest of us are actually having a heated debate over a topic OP's religion has put many to death for over the years.

Have you ever considered the implications of your being wrong?
I know I am saved.
I believe it likely that OP is as well.
We might not even like one another, but one day Jesus will set down, straighten our crap out, and we will move on from there.

You, however, have a much darker future.

Attached: 1618601051617.jpg (640x640, 78.01K)