How accurate is this?
How accurate is this?
Angel Richardson
Michael Anderson
Jesus christ
Mohammad
Buddah
Ceasar
Newton
Beethoven
Hitler
Washington
Josiah Martin
you can argue for muhammad being #1 but the rest are pure fiction
ceasar would come after the religious founders, and after him probably come chinese emperor
Adam Phillips
Jesus is easily number one. Not even a debate
Luis Jenkins
>beethoven
>no Alexander the Great
>no Ghengis Khan
Typical leaf I would have put Newton or Einstein over some deaf dude. His talent and impact is far from unique or even that important, there are numerous authors that are now important
Oliver Phillips
Muhammad, the rest is kikes and nigger.
Isaac James
I would like to add Karl Marx and Adolf Hitler
Zachary Martin
It’s retarded and clearly American centred. This subject has been studied in depth by various scholars of history and none of their lists look remotely like that, Mohammed excepted.
James Ramirez
>no picture for Muhammed
It's funny, but I hope you realize there is no picture because he never actually existed. He's a fabrication of Uthman, the third Caliph and an amalgamation of many hearsay stories.
Cameron Smith
>refuse to even mention Jesus Christ
>reference every other person in relation to his death