The ACLU is trying to sue the governor here in VA for taking away the mask mandate. (Idk how the fuck youngkin got in but I guarantee it won’t happen again with the way the demographic situation is going)
I have a feeling that (((they))) have a part in the ACLU.
Also what about the southern poverty law center, anyone have info on them? I was researching employees of the ACLU and many of them had previously worked for the SPLC.
I saw a news article covering the topic and it was of course written by a jewess.
Well, Nadine Strossen who was the President of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1991 to 2008 is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
"Nadine Strossen has written, taught, and advocated extensively in the areas of constitutional law and civil liberties, including through frequent media interviews. From 1991 to 2008, she served as President of the American Civil Liberties Union, the first woman to head the nation’s largest and oldest civil liberties organization. Professor Strossen is currently a member of the ACLU’s National Advisory Council, as well as the Advisory Boards of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), Heterodox Academy, and the National Coalition Against Censorship. When she stepped down as ACLU President in 2008, three Supreme Court Justices participated in her farewell and tribute luncheon: Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Antonin Scalia, and David Souter.
Professor Strossen is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations."
Morton Halperin, who was the Director of the ACLU's Washington Office from 1984-1992, is currently a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He's also been associated with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace as a senior associate. Like Nadine Strossen, he is also Jewish.
"David R. Halperin Morton H. Halperin Michael H. Haltzel"
Washington, D.C., January 25, 2001—Morton H. Halperin has rejoined the Council as Senior Fellow, announced Council President Leslie H. Gelb. At the Council, Dr. Halperin will direct a project on democracy, working on a range of issues with an initial focus on the relationship of democracy and economic development. He was a member of the Council’s Studies Department from March 1996 to December 1998 and has now rejoined upon leaving the State Department.
Dr. Halperin served in the Clinton, Nixon, and Johnson administrations. Most recently, from December 1998 to January 2001 he was Director of the Policy Planning Staff at the Department of State. From February 1994 to March 1996, he was a Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Democracy at the National Security Council. In 1993, he was a consultant to the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and was nominated by the President for the position of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Democracy and Peacekeeping. In 1969, he was a Senior Staff member of the National Security Council staff with responsibility for National Security Planning. From July 1966 to January 1969, he worked in the Department of Defense where he served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (International Security Affairs), responsible for political-military planning and arms control.
Dr. Halperin has also been Senior Vice President of The Century Foundation/ Twentieth Century Fund, a Senior Associate of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and a Senior Fellow in Foreign Policy Studies of the Brookings Institution.
In addition to his involvement in foreign policy issues, Dr. Halperin worked for many years for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). He served as Director of the Center for National Security Studies from 1975-92, focusing on issues affecting both civil liberties and national security, such as the proper role of intelligence agencies and government secrecy. From 1984-92, he was also the Director of the Washington Office of the ACLU, with responsibility for the ACLU’s national legislative program as well as the activities of the ACLU Foundation based in the Washington Office. From 1960— 66, Dr. Halperin was Assistant Professor of Government and a Research Associate of the Center for International Affairs at Harvard University. He has taught as a visiting professor at a number of universities, including Columbia, Harvard, MIT, George Washington, Johns Hopkins, and Yale. He has taught courses on bureaucratic politics and foreign policy, human rights policy, arms control, and Congress and foreign policy.
Dr. Halperin received a BA from Columbia College and a Ph.D. in International Relations from Yale University. He is a member of the American Civil Liberties Union, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the International Institute of Strategic Studies.
ACLU is part of the same jew ngo sphere as the ADL, SPLC, etc. They are functionally a single organization operating under multiple fronts to create the illusion of being independent, similarly to what the various newsfeed, feeddump, newsdump etc outlets were shown to be doing during gamergate with journolist etc.
Daniel Bell
jews jew mouth mohels
Wyatt Phillips
Speaking on the Anti-Defamation League, they also have members of their leadership among the Council on Foreign Relation's membership list. Abraham Henry Foxman, the national director of the Anti-Defamation League from 1987 to 2015 and the current national director emeritus, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Jonathan Greenblatt, the current national director and CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
"Jonathan has served as an adjunct faculty member at the Anderson School of Management at UCLA and as a senior fellow at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. He is a Henry Crown Fellow of the Aspen Institute and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations."
"Since Trump was elected to office, immigration has remained front and center. From the border wall to the policy of family separation—in newsrooms, classrooms, courtroom, and around the family dinner table, Americans are talking about immigration.
Last week, Adjunct Senior Fellow Catherine Powell presided over a CFR roundtable, “Bringing a Gender Lens to Immigration: Domestic Violence–Based Asylum and Family Separation” with Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Immigrants’ Rights Project, and Sandra Park, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Women’s Rights Project.
A central insight from the roundtable was that the debate on immigration shifted when photos of children being taken away from their parents began appearing in media, including social media feeds. The stories of individual children—including recently a four-month-old baby taken from their parents at the border—have spurred outrage.
Even prominent Republicans expressed outrage. Former First Lady Laura Bush penned a scathing op-ed in the Washington Post, comparing the Trump administration’s “Zero Tolerance Policy” to the shameful decision to intern U.S. citizens and noncitizens of Japanese descent during World War II. Thousands of Americans gathered at protests and marches across the country. “I have literally never seen Americans show up for immigrants like this,” said Jess Morales Rocketto, Political Director of the National Domestic Workers Alliance. Park and Gelernt credit this outpouring of outrage with Trump’s decision to walk back the so-called Zero Tolerance policy."
So, this is interesting... Catherine Powell, a adjunct senior fellow in the Women and Foreign Policy program at the Council on Foreign Relations, held a roundtable conference with members of the American Civil Liberties Union. What was the purpose of this meeting? To discuss how mainstream media images of the children of illegal immigrants being separated from their parents effects public opinion on the immigration issue. So, if you've always suspected that the mainstream media has been using emotionally manipulated images of children to push the pro-immigration agenda, but you never had any hard evidence to prove it... Well, here you go. You have members of the most prominent civil liberties organizations meeting with members of the most prominent shadow government Round Table Group "think tank" in America to discuss this issue.
See what I mean, though. The leadership of all the most important NGOs, tax-exempt foundations and think tanks are almost all members of the Council on Foreign Relations. Let's take a look at the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation for instance. Darren Walk, the president of the Ford Foundation, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Rajiv J. Shah, the president of the Rockefeller Foundation, is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
"Darren Walker is president of the Ford Foundation, a $13 billion international social justice philanthropy. He is co-founder and chair of the U.S. Impact Investing Alliance and the Presidents’ Council on Disability Inclusion in Philanthropy.
He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the recipient of 16 honorary degrees and university awards, including Harvard University’s W.E.B. Du Bois Medal."
"Dr. Rajiv Shah serves as President of The Rockefeller Foundation, a global institution with a century long record of success applying science, technology, and innovation to lift up the world’s most vulnerable."
Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, the president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. But that's not all! Penny Pritzker, of the Jewish elite bloodline of the Hyatt Hotels Corporation, is the chair of the Board of Trustees for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. And guess what? She's also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
"Ginger M. Cruz Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar Selena S. Cuffe"
"Mariano-Florentino (Tino) Cuéllar is the tenth president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. A former justice of the Supreme Court of California, he served two U.S. presidents at the White House and in federal agencies, and was a faculty member at Stanford University for two decades."
Well, at least the Carnegie Corporation of New York is differen- Not so fast! Thomas Howard Kean, the president of the Carnegie Corporation of New York, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
"Charlotte G. Kea Thomas H. Kean Catherine M. Keating"
"Governor Kean currently serves as trustee of the board of Carnegie Corporation of New York. In addition, he has served on a number of corporate boards and is former chair of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, co-chair of JerseyCan, and co-chair with Congressman Lee Hamilton of the Task Force on Extremism in Fragile States. He is vice chairman of the Environmental Defense Fund. He serves on the board of the Seeing Eye and is the former chair of The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the nation’s largest health philanthropy. He is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and American Academy of Art & Sciences."
>I was researching employees of the ACLU and many of them had previously worked for the SPLC
It used to be based and is now cucked as a result of infiltration, that's the short version.
Gabriel Cooper
Why the ACLU Flip-Flopped on Vaccine Mandates The historically libertarian organization now says that strict public-health measures protect freedom rather than limit it.
Forced vaccination against the H1N1 flu, the ACLU wrote at the time, “was not warranted.” The organization’s New York chapter said that individuals “have a constitutional right to bodily autonomy,” and that ordering people to choose between a vaccine and losing their job “is coercive, invasive and unjustifiably intrudes upon their fundamental rights.”
The limited vaccine mandates adopted during the H1N1 epidemic pale in comparison with the directives popping up now in response to the far more dangerous COVID-19 crisis. At the time of the ACLU’s 2009 statement, about 1,500 Americans had died from the H1N1 virus, compared with the approximately 650,000 who have died from COVID-19 as of this writing. Governments and private businesses are requiring COVID-19 vaccinations for their employees, universities are mandating them for their students, and cities are telling their residents that if they want to eat inside a restaurant or attend pretty much any indoor entertainment event, they too must get vaccinated. Critics of the mandates and other orders issued in the name of public health have flooded the courts with lawsuits, challenging the policies on civil-liberties grounds. Some have asked the ACLU for help. But the century-old organization most famous for taking up this cause—civil liberties is actually its middle name—has instead joined the other side.
And the SPLC is a literal hate group promoting race war while claiming to be the exact opposite. Their actions are diametrically opposed to their words and when you point this out they label you a hate group.
Austin Hill
The ACLU’s initial reaction to the idea of COVID-vaccine mandates was skepticism. In a piece published in March, the senior policy analyst Jay Stanley warned that “there’s a lot that can go wrong” with vaccine passports, citing the potential for privacy abuses and lack of universal access associated with forcing people to provide digital proof of their immunization. But last week, the organization endorsed vaccine requirements, adopting the argument that mandatory inoculations against COVID-19 “further civil liberties” by protecting the most vulnerable. “We see no civil liberties problem with requiring Covid-19 vaccines in most circumstances,” wrote David Cole, the ACLU’s legal director, and Daniel Mach, the director of its program on freedom of religion and belief.
In a recent interview, Cole told me that the organization had assigned a working group of lawyers to consult with public-health experts over the past several months in order to develop its position. But he suggested that it was not a particularly close call. “Whether it’s bodily integrity, personal autonomy, or religious freedom, they’re all rights that are recognized in the Constitution, but they’re not absolute rights,” Cole said. “You don’t have the right to inflict harm on third parties, and that’s what you’re doing when you refuse to take a safe and effective vaccine to a very infectious virus.”
Blake Ortiz
And the ACLU now receives most of its funding from large intranational organisations instead of small donors, which I'm sure explains why they now support the stances they do.
Benjamin Bell
Isn't that wonderful. The ACLU is telling us that "all rights that are recognized in the constitution" are "not absolute rights". The same rhetoric that Biden has been using. Frankly, it's the same rhetoric that "progressives" in favor of a "living constitution" have been advocating for a century now. These are the people that are supposed to be protecting our civil liberties? These people are part of the ruling class, user. They rub elbows with the most elite bloodlines in the country within its most secretive think tank organizations. They are not on the side of the common people. They're starting to become much more brazen about that fact as well. Advocating for the "rights" of the group against the rights of the individual even when there are no such "positive rights" that they're espousing for written in the constitutions or the Bill of Rights.
Austin Reyes
Also, Mark Suzman, the CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. I'm sure the pattern will break soon, Any Forums!
"The following is a guest post by my colleague Yanzhong Huang, senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations.
As one of the single biggest funders in global health, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has not only helped renew the dynamism and attractiveness of global health, but also played an important part in improving health conditions in developing countries. What role do policy and advocacy play in shaping the global health and development agenda, particularly as it relates to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)? What are the implications for development and governance following the adoption of the health-related SDGs? Finally, what role is the foundation playing in pandemic preparedness following the Ebola crisis?
In this podcast, I discuss these and other questions with Mark Suzman, president of Global Policy, Advocacy, and Country Programs at the Gates Foundation."
