Historically why were Slavs always ruled by foreign nobles?

Historically why were Slavs always ruled by foreign nobles?

Attached: tumblr_od1nbtPwip1u6oeoao3_1280.jpg (903x1293, 288.11K)

Other urls found in this thread:

academia.edu/983627/Richard_I_and_the_Jewish_Servi_Camarae_as_a_Funding_Source_for_the_Third_Crusade?pop_sutd=false
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

because they are instinctively subservient and easy to subject.

because they're white niggers

They were so combative and spiteful they'd rather have an outsider unite and rule them than one of the local chieftains

So were the Anglos, French, Germans etc. Go to /his/ retard

almost all european nations were ruled by the Hapsburg one time or another

did i say you muttposters are illiterate thrash?
bc you muttposters are illiterate thrash. read a fucking book.

Foreign nobility has been the norm for almost all peoples throughout history

What the fuck is going on? The Jew is the only one who knows and speaks the truth. What's next? Will dogs and cats be friends? The Slavic tribes were constantly at war with each other, but then they had to unite in front of a common threat in the form of nomadic steppe dwellers. But they could not decide which tribe the leader would be from. And they called the Varangians. And it worked

Attached: Oxzd7FvJE_o.jpg (811x1000, 295.2K)

based queue sporter

Read Ibrahim Ibn Jacob.
It was due to "democracy". Slavs ruled themselves in a democratic way. This resulted in a lot of differing voices and problems with ruling over bigger areas and more people than few villages in a time.
Then the autoritharian rullers came and showed that by force you can unite more people under you.
Thus slavic people were conquered by foreign powers.
This is what always will happen in democracy. Too many loose ends that need to be tied by strong knot if you want to keep a nation going.

thats the rus, you nigger.
just because you werent able to pull your fingers out of your ass it doesnt mean it was the case for everybody

>The Jew
lots of slavs in israel

>This is what always will happen in democracy.

it took france 25 years to turn into utter shit.
the war on democracies lasts for centuries and is far from over

read a book, nigger

imaginary borders weren't a thing back then so they were all related

>why were Slavs always ruled by foreign nobles?
*except Poland

We had our very own Piast dynasty.

*france = louis the last.
the king was incompetent,
the bourgeoisie took over.

in absolutism all it takes is one failure.
in democracy you have to corrupt the whole of a population

Democarcies have a lifespan of 200-250 years historically.
France is a republic btw.

yes we're ruled by nobles

Attached: #a44dc8.png (778x438, 462.8K)

third time's a charm pat

Attached: #fd36bb.png (1023x768, 769.64K)

They are racially impure.

Democracy is a form of government in which Europeans replace themselves with foreigners. EU and US say Poland and Hungary are undemocratic.

yes i actually took 3 successive photos

Attached: image (10).png (1023x768, 628.16K)

SPBP

forgot pic

Attached: #baf909.png (1023x768, 774.16K)

Attached: Moor Habsburg.jpg (453x750, 424.87K)

republic is a representative democracy.
i wont delve too long on it im angry enough as is.

very dishonest argument.
in the past europe was much "emptier"
you say democracies have a lifespan of 200-250, but most democracies are still existing, so the 200 yrs are ongoing

and geopolitical landscape changes very fast, compared to said 200 years.
in such a period of time the american empire had the time to become, flourish, and fall.

system analysis:
absolutism - 1 point of failure
democracy - multiple points of failure
so democracy > absolutism.
simple as.

Attached: #146c20.png (1361x765, 668.12K)

It's in their very name lol. Don't you know the origin of the word "slave"?

does that answer your question about royalty

grass is always greener on the other side of the fence.
but when you think about it, objectively democratic systems > absolutism.

what gives?

A republic is a form of democracy where jews replace a native population and put the native Europeans on a terror watchlist for complaining about it.

yeah and absolutism is a form of government where retard nobles fatten the pockets of said juwes.

academia.edu/983627/Richard_I_and_the_Jewish_Servi_Camarae_as_a_Funding_Source_for_the_Third_Crusade?pop_sutd=false

read a fucking book, retard

All great empires ruled by foreigners. French William I the Conqueror take your shitty islands, germans ruled in France and Italy, small asian population rule in proto-osman Empire, and in future greeks and armenians rules in Osman Empire. I mean, educate yourself nigger.

Attached: 09941255-78A0-4EAA-9D0D-5CED1D0E7FA4.jpg (3930x2974, 2.14M)

Glory?

Attached: Бой_скифов_со_славянами.jpg (1599x885, 436.6K)

I tell you to read historical account of famous historian about Slavic people.

You spew "read a book nigger" because I said that democracy is prone to be easily conquered by authoritarians due to many differing points of view.

Fucking "democracy" brainwashed retard. Every single time...

>system analysis:
>absolutism - 1 point of failure
>democracy - multiple points of failure
>so democracy > absolutism.
>simple as.