Big pharma is evil

true they aren't but going without insulin is more deadly than being infected with covid

Attached: 0nn7Mo2.jpg (1052x1080, 150.46K)

think about it like this:
Why aren't they calling insulin a vaccine?

mighty big words for someone in shitposting distance

Attached: 1450478721817.jpg (1024x730, 176.93K)

because COVID is spreadable but diabetes and cancer isn't

the pharma shills have done a remarkable job. really i'm impressed at how they just wiped everybody's memory when the number 1 cause of death of 18-45 year olds is prescription drug overdoses which they caused. they're evil and manipulative but their propaganda is effective.

Attached: 1ezr49dzo9g81.jpg (540x405, 40.32K)

the cat is done for, give me the address, now

Why is maga3x spamming the fucking board

Attached: 1616383354182.png (988x921, 254.94K)

I've been looking so hard for a version of that chess game where the pieces still brutally murder each other. The King killing the Queen was still the best. Traitorous cunt.

Based Herc

No insulin = guaranteed death.
No chemo = guaranteed slow and painful death.
No epipen in allergy emergency = almost guaranteed, scary as hell death.
No COVID vax = your survival rate stays at a modest 99.998-ish percent, unless you have AIDS or whatever else in that ballpark.
Plus manufacturing, training, and """research""", what little they did, costs a fuckload of money paid for by the taxpayers.

I really feel they don't have the capacity to reason logically. They literally just regurgitate talking points as they are told and don't question the contradictory nature of the orders. They are the perfect slaves. The ones you could get to believe anything as long as an authority figure says it. Their entire worldview is essentially an appeal to authority logical fallacy writ large.

The shots aren’t free they were bought with our tax dollars. Assuming everything we’re told is true then the simple fact is that it is in society’s best interest to prevent widespread death and hospitalization during a pandemic. Chronic diseases like diabetes and cancer do not cause an acute spike in hospitalization, deaths and productivity loss suddenly like a pandemic can.

I assume Sorbo doesn’t believe in socialized healthcare yet his argument effectively states that insulin, chemotherapy and epicene should be free because they ARE life saving.

that would only make sense if the "vaccine" would prevent transmission
which it doesn't

Kotstreet in Kotburg

Attached: 1450479371874.jpg (800x800, 144.12K)

the guy's point is that insulin, epipens, chemo etc should also be "free" just like the vax.

non-sequitur. Why shouldn't a life-saving treatment for a non-contagious disease be free if it kills more people?

Productivity losses aren't caused by the virus, they're caused by the response to the virus, the "oh, I heard you cough, you get one week paid leave", or someone might've maybe possibly come into contact with someone who was sick, so now they have to be holed up in their house for a week just to be sure.

I've never seen more ardent corporatists than among marxists.

>No chemo = guaranteed slow and painful death.
i don't think this is always true. you always read about miracle cures for cancer and sometimes they work.
>Plus manufacturing, training, and """research""", what little they did, costs a fuckload of money paid for by the taxpayers.
NPCs don't get that we are paying for it because you don't pay for the vaccine at the test site. it's like when they want free healthcare. healthcare cannot ever be free but it can be taxpayer subsidized. so because you don't pay for the jab at the test center, or sometimes the government pays you to get jabbed, the issue of big pharma greed is conveniently sidestepped.

Attached: 2izrLMKl.jpg (295x640, 24.02K)

>non-sequitur.
Not at all. Non-communicable diseases are less of a public risk especially diseases largely preventable through lifestyle choices.