AHHHHHHH

Vaccines appear to be entering negative efficacy territory, according to the Lancet. thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)00089-7/fulltext

Attached: 78C7C73D-B263-4556-8E5E-DDDAAC240A12.jpg (446x309, 22.67K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=jtlWCux2dJg
jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788894
thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)00089-7/fulltext
trmlx.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/DMED_Report_-_26JAN22.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Kek

Does anyone have that video of the military found 500% increase in cancer and stillbirths?

Oh wow the schizos were right... big surpruse there...

Get boosted and make sure to mix doses!

>just take an injection with no long term studies bro

Attached: 6F5B92D5-0BD5-4065-BB55-AD910F9802DB.png (600x441, 170.06K)

I had three, still not dead baby.

>We found progressively waning vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection of any severity across all subgroups, but the rate of waning differed according to vaccine type. With respect to severe COVID-19, vaccine effectiveness seemed to be better maintained, although some waning became evident after 4 months. The results strengthen the evidence-based rationale for administration of a third vaccine dose as a booster.

Vaccines stop working after 4 months so you have to get your booster!

Attached: copenigger4.jpg (1284x851, 371.31K)

No but pic related

Attached: 1644261757313m.jpg (1024x1012, 151.47K)

gg no re

youtube.com/watch?v=jtlWCux2dJg

Attached: retarded_tits.png (379x504, 390.25K)

No surpruse here. Here’s another recent study in JAMA that found natural antibodies don’t wane. and you get more than one kind, in fact since they don’t (can’t?) test for it, you probably have multiple kinds of anti-spike and nucleocapsid antibodies. jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788894

boost4life

You should probably read the links before you post them on here so you don't look retarded, this literally says to take the booster.

Attached: take the booster.png (564x245, 31.49K)

It’s the Lancet. Of course they would say take the booster. They’ll eventually say to just get boosted every 4 months. What’s your point?

>what's your point
my point is the link you shared explicitly recommends the booster, yet you are posting it as if it is some "vaxxies BTFO bombshell" because you're too dumb to read/comprehend it.

Yeah, cause the effectiveness wanes over times and even drops into the negative after taking the first shot.
Basically, if you've already taken any jab, you're better of taking the next one too, and then keep taking them for the rest of your life cause your immune system is fucking done for.

I think youre the retard that cant understand

based and saved

I can't wait. In a few years I'm going to be locked to the milking table and relieved of my precious untainted man seed.

Turns out antigenic original sin is a bitch

>The results strengthen the evidence-based rationale for administration of a third vaccine dose as a booster.

Get your booster goy.

Attached: 1641881896657.gif (640x612, 2.35M)

Again, regardless of their “recommendations”, if you aren’t concerned about the implications of negative vaccine efficacy, you’re the retard here.

>vaccine was near 100% effective
bullshit

Attached: vaccine midwit.jpg (1024x682, 280.15K)

Why stop at 3, fren?

All of my family took this... lord knows I tried

>Get your booster goy.
well you have to now that youve taken the vaxx
youll have to keep artificially raising your fucked immune system until you die of blood clots or a heart attack

>thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)00089-7/fulltext
very nice

Yet.

Do you even understand how this study works? It's a total population cohort study, meaning they just take compare the entire group of vaxxies to antivaxxes and ignore literally everything else about them (age, comorbidities, etc) and then compare the hospitalization rates at different times.

The vaccines do not "damage your immune system" they just run out after awhile and grandmas who got two shots start dying again while young healthy people don't die either way.

You people genuinely don't understand negative efficacy claims. You're comparing the death rates of old sick people to young healthy people and pretending the major difference between the two is vax status.

read the study brainlet

I texted my friend just those words and he texted me back a few hours later freaking the fuck out... sad

Attached: fixed.png (512x789, 160.19K)

The third one was the worst and apparently the 4th one is even worse. My mates arm went big and red for a few hours after his 4th so I went fuck that.

No u read the study

>three
you are not one of those unvax conspiracy theorists are you?

Not video but

Attached: C21CC40D-CC34-47BB-A902-6EEB4FA632F9.png (612x466, 43.99K)

You're retarded if you can't read between the lines here. Enjoy getting boosted every month for the rest of your short life.

You don't think they would take age into consideration?
Unless I'm reading this wrong, this table shows that the average ages for the vaccinated and unvaccinated are mostly the same.

Attached: 8623598723.png (1052x680, 38.45K)

Glad to be part of the control group.

Hes a paid shill dont even try to talk to him look at the pic he posted what type of faggot would make such a meme unless they were a dirty kike

>REFUNDS [n/a]

That mechanism would predict vaccine effectiveness would approach zero, not cross zero and go into negative territory. And since it increases your risk of catching covid, it begs the question: Will it increase hospitalizations further into the future?

>anyone who disagrees with me is a paid shill!

>he thinks vaccine-induced immunopathology isn't a thing.
lol youd better hope so jabbie. No refunds

Actually they took all those factors you describe into account and did a Cox hazard model on it. Search the study for cox to read more about it

Attached: raff.jpg (955x768, 154.8K)

Leaked document
trmlx.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/DMED_Report_-_26JAN22.pdf

Cerebral Infarctions up 393%
Bell's Palsy up 319%
Guillain-Barre Syndrome up 250%
Immunodeficiencies up 275%
Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura up 322%
Menstrual Irregularity up 476%
Unspecified Chest Pain up 1,529%
Dyspnea and Shortness of breath up 905%
Acute Myocardial Infarction up 269%
Acute Pericarditis up 175%
Pulmonary Embolism up 467%
DIC - Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation up 1,175%
HIV up 590%
MS/Demyelinating Disease up 487%
Neoplasms up 296%
Nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage/ICH up 312%
Spontaneous Abortion up 306%
Thrombocytopenia up 242%

Exactly… now imagine that graph if it started at the true efficacy value (maybe)~50%

Everyone dies user.

Time for anudda shot, Goyim!

Attached: CovidJuden.png (696x892, 807.32K)

Kikes defending kikes wheeeewie surprise lads

Source?

I had an idea but no idea these numbers were this fucked holy shit why haven't we minecrafted everyone at the CDC and Pfizer

Attached: 1644278742490.jpg (193x169, 5.66K)

A Link? In the first post. With that flag? Am I really on pol right now?

>according to Lancelot
What is King Arthur going to say about this?

kek
>just take the negative efficacy vaccine bro!

>hiv requiring twice a year booster to live

Enjoy the ride.

Attached: Screenshot_20220206-105343_Chrome.jpg (1080x2400, 581.87K)

You didn’t read the study, shill. Of course they age match you absolute mong. They also match to gender and location:
> Each individual was then matched (1:1) by Statistics Sweden, the national agency for statistics, to one randomly sampled individual from the total population of Sweden on birth year, sex, and municipality. In total, the cohort (vaccinated, those with documented infection, and matches) consisted of 5833003 individuals.

Death by VAIDS will be slow and drain a lot of bank accounts in the process right according to plan

That's a good one.

Still going raw dog. Don't care.

Um bros? I just got my booster…

>hiv vaccine
Maybe don’t fuck faggots in the ass? Is that too much to ask?