Phil Mason

He is very smart and educated on science and Elon Musk and he has great political talking points.

Attached: thunderfoot.jpg (1200x900, 220.05K)

kek

He sided with the feminists like pol back in 2014. He is certainly our guy....


......

That smile. That damned smile..

He's a nice guy, and almost based on some topics, if you can put his politics aside. Politically, he is an absolute retard. I've worked in laboratories and this is always the exact kind of political takes that you hear from the more theoretical scientists or lab monkeys. Engineers don't have this problem for some reason.

He is cool and redpilled me on feminism and Islam more than a decade ago, but he's always been a bit cringe and he just comes of as envious of Musk

>educated on elon musk
yeah, the only thing he can talk about apparently, must be riveting dinner company

He's a faggot who doesnt understand anything, cmpletely retarded on most topics, and probably a small dick cause he hates so much
he did something right with liquid metals and drove some points in nicely back in gamergate
thats it
nay of his vieos is just the same shit over and over

>arrogantly promotes atheism

LOL. There's nothing on his channel that isn't better covered by EEVBlog and Electroboom but without the cringe but with many times the information density.

Attached: EEVblog-1389-Spanish-Solar-Pavement-STUPIDITY.jpg (1280x720, 169.85K)

recognize him from somewhere. Didn't he used to do youtube videos about cool tech like nuclear power etc?

fuckin got me

i'd vote for him

EEVBlog is objectively the better option. Less shit, more science.

thund3rf00t if I recall correctly
he did that "save 10,000 copies of the quran and burn the HDD" thing and the "draw mohammad" thing, back before it became fashionable to defend all darkoids

stopped listening to him when the brexit thing was happening and he shilled hardcore against it because his work was being funded by the EU
can't really trust him to be objective on other topics anymore now that I have seen how biased he will be when it suits his personal interests

>Engineers don't have this problem for some reason.
they don't get lost in the technical details of how something works, they just check if it works in general.
leads to a more realistic view whereas the theoretician will probably lose track of the bigger picture and get stuck on random details

>his last video
absolute clown

He started off doing videos about atheism. Around the time of GamerGate, he moved on to feminism. When that dried up, he moved on to exposing frauds on crowdfunding sites. Then the Hyperloop came along and he jumped on criticizing that. That's when he learned anything Elon Musk related was pure clickbait gold. So now he makes video after video stalking Musk across all of his companies. These videos have very low information content, with him repeating the same things over and over again.
It's not so much that he's wrong. Some of what he posts is correct, some is wrong, but his presentation is designed to milk as much revenue as possible. It's estimated that he has made over $600,000 from YouTube and more from Patreon and similar sources. There's nothing he does that isn't done better by other channels. If you value your time, you'll skip Phil's videos and watch other more straight forward channels instead.

Attached: i hate starlink.jpg (480x360, 31.22K)

He's easily bought out and motivated by money, that was his anti-brexit justification of scientific funding.

I thought it was great. What's bad about it??

He's to snob. He loves to shit on incoming tech as impossible because he don't know how it works, therefore is a scam on his mind.
Standard retard leftist.

He is completely obsessed with Elon that killed his show

the choice to use a PET container and the charging process
It's the difference between showing that dioxane is actually influenced by the charge and hexane isn't, albeit because in the case of dioxane it's also a surface tension phenomena
this is why experiments need to be controlled for even the stupidest fucking variables, if he used the capillary syringe he made to test dioxane, he would have found the very tiniest attraction to the charge, and it would have shown better if he used a more rigorous method to deposit the charge on the container instead of just assuming "it's enough"

ah, I only remember some videos of him explaining why nuclear would still be the superior option over 'green' energy, both yield wise as environmentally.
that's about it.

That’s clearly weird Al. Also did you guys no weird Al isn’t Jewish.

What's with this becoming an entire genre? I watched one video of a guy seething aabout Elon Musk and now I get a ton of similar videos recommended.

Athiesm is cringe

>Also did you guys no weird Al isn’t Jewish.
I don't believe you.